My review of the GOP field

Time to gauge where I’m at with the GOP primary, other than wishing it was over and done with.   Very tired of the manufactured drama, starring Donald Trump.  As I’ve written many times, I will never vote for him and I do harbor suspicions that he is a dupe (not a plant) of the Clintons, because as I’ve watched Hillary Clinton go from the stiff, robotic candidate in the Spring, to the smiling hipster, cracking jokes and yukking it up on late night TV, it’s obvious dramatic changes took place within her campaign.  I believe that unlike her 2008 campaign, where she kept one of America’s true political geniuses at bay,  in the early months of this campaign, where it looked like she might not survive to the Fall, in desperation she turned to him.  I strongly suspect that he set in motion the strategy that has worked miracles for him over the years.  Yes, I see the Bill Clinton triangulation strategy playing out, with far-left kook Bernie on the left, Trump sounding more and more like a fascist on the right and there’s “love and kindness Hillary, appearing as moderate and centrist.  I’ve mentioned my suspicions many times ( here, here, here).

In the GOP camp, Donald Trump creates drama, chaos and endless controversy.  Assuredly, on the big issues he champions, he mouths many home truths that are inconvenient for the DC cocktail party crowd to hear and acts like gasoline tossed on the liberal press and pundits’ self-righteous, politically correct  pieties.  He’s reduced their arguments to a heaping pile of ashes and for that alone, we should all cheer.  However, there are several “buts”, like, but he doesn’t have a clear grasp of The Constitution and his cures often come without clear plans and overstep constitutional bonds.  Of course, those who believe in his great business acumen, don’t harbor the doubts that I do – they see the great American success story, while I see the  yuge glowing red warning sign of toxic leadership.

I left my job at a retail store earlier this year, where I  worked for a man, whom I believe was the most talented merchandiser I have ever seen.  Along with that talent came a huge ego and the worst people skills I have ever seen in my life, that is, until I’ve watched Donald Trump brag, insult, bash and mock his GOP rivals.  This man threw anyone under the bus to make himself look good and he bragged as much as Trump.  He loved to fire people, very much like Trump.  One tirade too many right on the sales floor and I decided to put in my two-week notice, after working there many years.  He was my 8th store manager and I had never had a single problem with any of the others.  YUGE relief is what I feel not having to deal with him anymore!

The only team The Donald is on, is his own.  He does not care about the GOP party or causes per se, they’re just the vehicle he is driving to become President, where he believes his dynamic business acumen will single-handedly “make America great again”.  He’s right on many issues – even in his latest kerfuffle about Muslim immigration, on the main points he’s right – it doesn’t make sense to be bringing in Muslim immigrants from several countries that are hot beds of Islamist terror and where the collapse of government in many of these regions makes adequate vetting impossible.  And he nailed the alarming truth that the Obama administration doesn’t know what the hell is going on with their own immigration policies.  A pause makes perfect sense.

Time will tell if the Carville/Begala campaign modus operandi, that I strongly suspect is playing out in the Trump campaign, is true or just a nutty conspiracy theory.  For me, it doesn’t take much imagination to envision Bill Clinton calling Trump when he caught wind that Trump was considering running.  Trump and Bill Clinton golf together and have known each other for years.  Trump was a yuge Clinton supporter.  So, the phone call could have been as simple as this:

Bill Clinton calls Trump :  Hi Donald, I hear you’re thinking of throwing your hat into the 2016 race?

Trump:  Yes, I am.

Bill Clinton:  Well, you know I believe Hillary is the best candidate for 2016, but I wish you good luck and you know, Donald, the one bit of advice I’ll give you is you’ll need great political advisers.  A national race is really complicated.

Trump:  Well thanks for that advice.  I am still putting a campaign staff together.

Bill Clinton:  No problem Donald, you know I am already taken (laugh, laugh), but the best political advisers are Carville and Begala.  Those GOP political advisers don’t have the guts to run a tough race.

Trump:  Thanks, you know me,  I want the best political advisers.   You know I’m going to fund my own campaign, if I jump in.  Do you think Carville and Begala would work for a GOP candidate.

Bill Clinton: I can’t speak for them, but you know, business is business, so you’d have to talk to them yourself.

Set-up done.  It could have been that easy for Bill Clinton to manipulate the downfall of the GOP primary. Carville and Begala easily could have advised Trump to keep the business relationship secret, because Republicans go into derangement mode about them.  It’s obvious Bill Clinton threw his weight around and called in all sorts of favors within the Democratic party to bury this email server scandal and the Benghazi committee investigation to get her campaign on track.

The other GOP field, except for Rubio and Cruz, lies like dying fish washed up on shore, gasping their last breath.  Fiorina seemed to have so much potential – smart, well-prepared, excellent public speaking skills, but then she turned into a scorned feminist, who played the victim card at every turn – whining her way to main debate stage.  Her “well-prepared” quickly became boring repetitive, rehearsed diatribes and there didn’t seem a hairbreadth’s difference between her shrill, angry “I am woman, hear me roar” harangues than Hillary’s.  The rest of the GOP field, many having crystal clear conservative principles and records, due to The Donald’s monopoly of the press and pundits attention, fell to the wayside.  Dr. Carson, the other outsider, still seems like a very nice man, who wants to make a positive change.   Unfortunately, his contemplative pauses, lack of foreign policy cred and string of odd remarks have doomed his chances.

I could happily vote for Ted Cruz, even though I doubt he can win in the general election.  His pitfalls are he always appears as if what he’s saying now is a careful tactical move  in some political grand strategy , which on an intellectual level, I admire, but on a more human level, it comes across as cold and calculating.  His other main drawback centers on how he speaks with such overblown rhetoric that it feels as if he’s talking down to people.   Rubio has boyish good looks and an engaging personality, but I feel he’s misguided on foreign policy and easily led by “military and think tanks experts”, unfortunately it sounds like all of his are neocons, whom I disagree with on most policy issues.  I still like him, but it would take a lot of soul-searching for me to support him.  Chris Christie comes across well in debates, but here again, as a conservative, I have a hard time with Republican-lite candidates

8 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, Terrorism, Uncategorized

Blog note

We had one of our dogs put to sleep Friday.  He was my former daughter in-law’s beagle and I thought he was 13, but my son told me that when he informed her of his death,  she said he was 15 years old.  He was an obese beagle, who had a cranky streak, but he loved me and followed me wherever I went in the house.   He was always laying on the floor near me when I’m on the computer.

The past few months have been a downward spiral  – heart problems, COPD, then he tore an ACL tendon in his left back leg.  Due to his medical problems and the obesity, he wasn’t a candidate for surgery.  He seemed to be doing much better lately.   He’d lost some weight and was moving more.   Although the 8 medications he was on were tiresome to administer, I was hoping he’d be around for a long while yet.  Thursday morning he couldn’t stand up and when I helped him up he was wobbly and kept falling on his left side.  I sat on the floor and fed him canned dog food Thursday and carried him outside to do his business that day, but he needed help to even stand up for that.

The vet told us he had injured his right leg and hip and he was trying to shift his weight to the left side.  She said he was in a great deal of pain and he was already on a pain medication.  We decided to have him put to sleep and that’s one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.

Sure, there are 5 other dogs  here, but I still miss him.  Let’s see 2  were my oldest daughter’s dogs and one was my youngest daughter’s dog and 2 belong to my husband and me – all of them old dogs and some with serious medical problems, so I’ve spent quite a bit of time crying the past few days and worrying about going through this again in the near future.  I’ll try to get back to blogging this week.

4 Comments

Filed under Blog Notes

What he should have said

Here’s what President Obama should have said on Sunday night.  Sen. Ben Sasse from Nebraska articulates who we’re fighting and what we are fighting for. (H/T Truth Revolt.org)

6 Comments

Filed under American Character, Culture Wars, Food for Thought, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism, Uncategorized

A niggling incongruent bit of information

Tashfeen Malik, erstwhile jihadi bride of Sayed Farhood and Islamist terrorist has been reported on since the San Bernadino terrorist attack last week.  There are many things we know and many things we don’t know and then there are things the press reported that make no sense, if you are to believe the facts as presented.  The FBI affirms that both Malik and Farhood were radicalized for some time before this terrorist attack.  They’re following all sorts of leads, but one lead they should look into is how this online marriage came about.

Muslim women raised in Western countries have been surrounded by a culture where women interact with men outside their family, without supervision or social stigma.  Malik was born in Pakistan and raised in Saudi Arabia, so why would this “devout Muslim” woman, whom Farhood’s family claims that they never even saw her face, look for an American husband or for that matter chat online with a male stranger?  Somewhere in this mess are middlemen matchmakers, perhaps jihadist family members or a jihadist group,  who arranged this marriage.  It seems incomprehensible that a devout Muslim woman, with her background, would hook-up with an American, Muslim or not – it just makes no sense, unless she was sent to carry out a terrorist attack or their families arranged this marriage.   The press just blithely reported this meeting online, no questions asked, but there’s more to it – more men involved in this.

6 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Terrorism

Words matter, so keep your dictionary handy

Here are my observations on  President Obama’s Oval Office speech Sunday night.  His narrative writers carefully chose those words, to serve as propaganda, to sway public opinion after seeing devastating poll numbers on how Americans feel about the President’s response to ISIS and Islamist terror.  For them, this wasn’t meant to be an actual change of course, only a change in word choice.  The Obama  administration does have a strategy, however that strategy is not to defeat ISIS, but to fundamentally transform (revolution) America.  If you pay attention to the Obama agenda and the things that inspire this president to get passionate and animated, you’ll discern it has nothing to do with fighting Islamist terrorists, heck, he’s planted Islamist sympathizers and enablers in the US military and throughout his administration to insure Muslim sensitivities aren’t offended rather than find a strategy to defeat Islamist terror.  That’s the truth! Now, if you juxtapose that with his actions to attack the police, while championing black thugs who get into altercations with the police, the Van Jones plan hits you in the face: it really is top down, bottom up, inside out – they are working to fundamentally transform (revolution) America. 

President Obama knew his speech would incite a reaction from the political far-right and actually they’re trying to create more divisiveness and that’s why they descend on these police/black clashes, Al Sharpton has an open invitation to the White House, the military has been cut and being the last bastion where an Alpha male ethos survived, they effectively neutered the US military – where our Secretary of Defense warbles on about transgenders and females in combat jobs making us stronger.  The White House reaction to this latest terrorist attack on American soil was meant to antagonize the political right – they want the racists and bigots to react, so they can justify confiscating guns from private citizens – they want to incite a race war in America – that is the truth!

Donald Trump, whom more and more Americans fed-up with Obama’s non-response are supporting, is there to incite the worst among the far-right.  I still believe Trump is a Trojan Horse set in motion by the Clinton political machine, but have no proof.  To understand Trump’s appeal, refer to my post, “He never means anything serious till he talks about justice and right.”  His rabble-rousing feeds Obama’s strategy and will insure a GOP defeat in 2016.  And in the midst of all this, there’s big money from George Soros and leftists funding Obama’s fundamental transformation (revolution), from BLM movement, to the Islamist apologists, to the Syrian refugee invasion.

I’ve written about it many times:

Building trust: The high road for America

The Obama/Black Grievance Community/Arab money connection?

Follow the money

Donald Trump’s response isn’t the problem

At this point, we’ve got Donald Trump, ostensibly a very recent conservative convert (Trojan Horse or dupe of the Clintons) inciting the far-right to act out and you’ve got the far-left (ensconced  in the White House, with the power of the executive branch, using executive power to subvert The Constitution and fundamentally transform  (revolution) America).  The far-left wants to incite the far-right to violence, so they can then use the levers of executive power to advance their revolution.

You can read the Van Jones plans in his STORM Handbook, but just like Malik Shabazz went from being a leader of a reviled hate group in America to the National President of Black lawyers for Justice, Jones these days isn’t a radical subversive, nope, he’s the clean-cut, well-spoken political analyst on CNN and the president of Rebuild the Dream…. what could sound more benign….

America, the Republic, is being redefined out of existence, but really the far-left wants the far-right to react violently, so that President Obama can use the power of the Presidency to strong arm his fundamental transformation (revolution) with a national police force, widespread gun confiscation from private citizens and a flurry of executive orders to quell free speech.  Loretta Lynch signaled that, by warning Americans she will prosecute hate speech.  Words matter, so keep your dictionary handy!

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Ralph Peters unloads

Ralph Peters, one of my favorite military analysts and one of America’s most creative military strategic thinkers, calls it like it is.  Please be warned Peters used a little salty language, but here again sometimes that says it best.  (Hat tip to PJ media, where I saw this video first)

2 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism

Diversity does not make us stronger

“Speaking from the Oval Office and surrounded by members of his national security team, Obama said the shooters perhaps had “mixed motives.”

“It is possible that this was terrorist-related. But we don’t know. It’s also possible that this was work-related,” he said.”

‘Mixed Motives’ in California Shooting by Michele Gorman

President Obama lives in a leftist bubble, where he turns every situation into a college classroom debate forum on his ideological causes.  He fixates on “narratives” and word choice over substance.  Most of the rest of the world lives where reality smacks them in the face, where brute force decides life and death struggle and where stark truths about human nature can’t be edited out, as some politically inconvenient line. Most of us in America live in the real world too, where we look at a situation like the San Bernadino terrorist attack, quickly assess the facts and form our conclusions based on those facts.

With unerring bad timing,  President Obama makes bold declarations about America’s enemies, where events unfold that quickly blow apart his carefully constructed “narratives.   “ISIL is contained,” the day before the Paris attack or  “No specific threat to US,”  just a week ago.

In keeping with the Obama administration bad timing, Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter, announced all combat positions will be open to women the day after the San Bernadino terrorist attack by Islamic radicals.  Assuredly, Secretary Carter believes that “diversity” makes us stronger, which he stated, but here’s the truth – selecting the best qualified people for military positions and maintaining high standards makes our military stronger.

So, selectivity, not diversity makes our military stronger and that means assessing the qualifications that best meet the mission.

In grueling combat jobs, where even most men fail to meet the physical standards, common sense and endless research can pinpoint with reliable accuracy where the female anatomy falls short on meeting these standards.   The Army made sure some females made it through Ranger school, where questions of different treatment to get them through the course have been raised, but be that as it may, in reality very few women will rush to get into the elite units and few (if any) have the physical ability to pursue a career in these jobs. Adding women to these jobs adds no advantage – absolutely NONE.  It creates another PC myth that must be maintained, even if the lie costs lives on the battlefield.  That’s the truth.  The entire hoopla about opening these fields to women is really about female officer career advancement, not about making the military stronger.

In the real world, where America’s adversaries size up our force, they hear the claptrap from the Pentagon, but they watch closely what happens in reality, far away from the DC echo chamber.  President Obama has slashed our forces, he has purged top generals and promoted sycophants, his military decisions lack any coherence or strategic sense. And then we come to this latest announcement – yes, while feminists cheer about the prospect of women in combat, America’s adversaries are laughing at us.    The day after an Islamic terrorist attack on American soil, the President preened on about “mixed motives”.  Then his attorney general publicly announced her greatest fear is not another terrorist attack or keeping Americans safe, nope her greatest concern is that Americans don’t use hate speech against Muslims. And finally the Pentagon announced women in combat jobs…

America sits a divided nation – where every public institution lumbers under the weight of highly-charged factionalized fighting.  One can only wonder what event or chain reaction will set the final collapse in motion.  If our Republic is going to survive, the last thing to believe is that “diversity makes us stronger”.  What made America great was not “diversity”, it was diverse people UNITED by a belief in a set of common civic values. Having common civic values and a common belief in The Constitution would help gird up our once great nation’s crumbling pillars.  I’ve written about this need to find common ground many times (here, here, here, here and here)  and as I said more than a year ago:

Truth matters and therein the fate of America lies.  We have hostile camps in America, left and right, black, white and every shade in-between, who find it easier to treat each other as enemies rather than talk and find common ground as fellow American citizens.  We’ve got too much diversity training and not enough American citizen training:

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

2 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism

A little humor is good

I found this video funny:

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Humor

You’ve got to stand for something

Plenty of home truths in this song worth thinking about!

Leave a comment

Filed under Food for Thought, General Interest

Just, Get Real!

General Mike Flynn, former DIA director, used the phrase that it’s time to “get real” in our fight against ISIS.  It’s time to “get real” in putting the pieces together with this terrorist attack on American soil yesterday!  The Obama administration will bend over backwards to call it everything except what it is – A TERRORIST ATTACK!    The media keeps yammering on about how this shooter in San Bernadino left this workplace Christmas party angry.  The shooter happens to be a devout Muslim, who recently traveled to Saudi Arabia – okay, that could be “not definitive”, but come on he went home and returned with his wife and reports indicate a third person and all of them were heavily armed, wearing black gear.  Well, here’s a clue from a co-worker of the terrorist:

“Baccari said his co-worker, who said he was raised on a farm with goats and chickens, was reserved. Several months ago Farook grew out his beard. He appeared committed to his family, and never displayed any unusual behavior or discussed any radical political views.”

The suspect left THREE IEDS in the Inland Regional Center before fleeing the scene of their massacre.  Sure, random act by disgruntled employee is to go home and gather together, not only the wife and guns, but IEDs lying around the house.  Sure, he went home and just randomly constructed some IEDs, because he got pissed at the Christmas party.  GET REAL!

I can tell you that for sure, that while the President will fixate on the gun problem in America, he’s barking up the wrong tree, by assiduously avoiding facing the Islamic radical problem.  I know, the left will next say the work Christmas party was insensitive and “incited” this violent response…   Yes, don’t make them angry, or else.  Just wait, this line of insane reasoning is coming.

So sick of the venal politicizing Islam’s dark, radical underbelly, after more than a decade and thousands of American lives lost in a fight where our leaders refuse to identify the enemy – it’s Islamic radicals who are following an ideology that is promoted and funded by some of America’s supposed allies in the Mid-East!  That’s not “hate”, that’s called identifying those who hate America and want to annihilate us (hint: America’s enemies).

5 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism