Boy with Gun – Oh My, How Scary….. (Not really)

A NJ family’s home was raided by police Saturday over a facebook birthday photo posting of the family’s 11 year-old son holding the .22  rifle he received for his birthday. (story here).  The father is a firearms instructor for the NRA, a NRA range safety officer and a NJ hunter education instructor, according to this story.  So, an anonymous call to some government child abuse hotline instigates a raid on a private citizen’s home over a facebook photo, because we’ve conditioned society to fear guns – especially a gun in the hands of an 11 year-old.  The child in question possesses a NJ hunting license and has passed the state’s hunter safety course.  So, this kid’s unsuspecting mom was at home when the police and Dept of Child and Families Services came knocking on the door.  They demanded to see all the guns in the family’s gun safe.  The story goes Mom called Dad, who rushed home and called his attorney.  The attorney told the father not to open his gun safe unless the police produced a warrant.  Thus far the police have not returned with a warrant.  All of this drama set in motion over a mass overreaction about a photo of a gun in the hands of an 11 year-old boy.

Considering we live in a country where adults can’t distinguish between real guns and a pastry,  whose shape vaguely resembles a gun, this raid should come as no surprise.  The shocking part is that the police tried to push their weight around without a warrant and that should cause more alarm than a kid holding a gun.  We’ve got a lot of government bureaucrats who deal with our children’s safety reacting in bizarre and alarmingly irrational ways all in the name of “zero tolerance”.   In light of the media induced gun hysteria, more of this type of government overreach seems likely.  George Will wrote an excellent piece, The Pop-Tart terrorist, (here) which explains our present culture of mass hysteria over rational thought – idiots run wild, beware!

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture Wars, Gun Control

Our Pacific Commander Prepares For Global Warming

Quick link to a Boston Globe piece  (here) on our top commander for the Pacific region, Navy Admiral Samuel J. Locklear, III, who expressed his belief that the most serious long-term security threat to the Pacific region is “global warming” during a meeting with scholars from Harvard and Tufts universities Friday. So, it appears we’re wasting military readiness time on the vagaries of “global warming”, treating it as a concrete fact, when real people problems in the Pacific region (Chinese aggression, North Korean aggression, China’s internal political, social and economic challenges, the myriad of escalating territorial tensions, etc.) might reasonably be expected to top his list of long-term threats.  The long-term ramifications of China’s One Child policy on China”s internal stability, as China must cope with a young adult male population that vastly outnumbers the young adult female population seems to be a potential serious long-term threat to regional stability, to my way of thinking (certainly more of a concern than the vagaries of climatic change theories).    This article goes on to explain how he’s engaging other countries in planning to stockpile supplies in strategic areas and planning exercises in May with countries in the region to address the “what-ifs”.   I feel so much safer knowing he’s preparing our Pacific forces for global warming, don’t you?

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military

Janet’s Ammo Stockpile

Often the vocal part of the pro-gun types gets relegated to some fringe stereotype, ridiculed by the mainstream media, liberal academics and many politicians in Washington on both sides of the aisle.  The rumors of government run amok continuously circulate, so it’s very easy, after decades of far-flung theories of nebulous compounds, black helicopters, and the various tales of the government plotting to take away guns, to dismiss these stories out of hand as just more urban myths.   So when Forbes, runs a piece, 1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security?  It’s Time For A National Conversation, (here), perhaps it’s time to stop automatically dismissing  these executive branch ammo stockpiling stories and demand some serious answers from this administration.  How many weapons does the DHS possess and why would they need to stockpile that many rounds?

Investors.com ran a commentary piece (here) by Andrew Malcolm at the end of February titled, Why are the feds loading up on so much ammo?, where he ponders the vast ammo stockpiling in the past year by this administration and the lack of real answers as to why these domestic agencies of the executive branch would need so much ammo.  Is it a devious plot to enforce gun control by making it nearly impossible for civilians to purchase ammo?  Is the administration gearing up for some sort of  civil strife that the rest of us remain oblivious about?  Are these agencies just trying to proactively keep us all safe?  Why would a group of far left ideologues, who want to see personal gun ownership severely restricted (many favoring  outright banning private gun ownership completely), embark on such a secretive ammo stockpiling effort?

The Obama administration refuses to answer these questions openly and honestly and so far Congress hasn’t exerted influence to demand answers. The Social Security Administration posted an answer last fall on  their website to quell rumors and insists their ammo purchases were strictly for training purposes and to arm their 589 agents who carry guns (here).  Is it time to start building that bunker in the backyard or acquiring a good survival guide ?  Well, I sure hope not, because for one I treasure my personal liberty , causing me to cringe at the very thought of retreating  to some dingy bunker and secondly, I enjoy my modern amenities too darned much to run away from a government run amok.  Personal liberty should not be taken for granted, it can be eroded by allowing corrupt people to gradually poison our well of freedom and before we know it our Republic sits poised to expire.  Reasonably, these large ammo acquisitions should propel us to demand that our Congress starts demanding some honest answers.    I sure don’t want to add a tin foil hat to my Spring fashion accessory list, but with this administration, the old Reagan  “trust, but verify” , saying seems quite appropriate and a prudent citizen response to this situation.

2 Comments

Filed under Gun Control, Politics

Mark Kelly Goes Gun Shopping

Breitbart.com (here) reports that Mark Kelly, the retired astronaut husband of former Congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords, purchased an AR-15 “assault rifle” the day after he testified before the Colorado legislature pushing for tighter gun control of this very weapon he purchased.  The story relates that witnesses in the store claim he also purchased a couple of high-capacity magazines and a semi-automatic pistol.  When the media caught wind of his gun purchases, Kelly came up with the story that he purchased the guns merely as a demonstration of how easy it is to buy guns and he claims he plans to turn them over to the Tucson police department (here).  If you believe this Arizona tall tale, then I’ll sing the George Strait chorus for you…….(here)

I’ve got some ocean front property in Arizona
from my front porch you can see the sea
I’ve got some ocean front property in Arizona
If you’ll buy that I’ll throw the Golden Gate in free
If you’ll buy that I’ll throw the Golden Gate in free

Leave a comment

Filed under Gun Control, Politics

Culture Demise: My Antique Home Remedy

Growing up in the feminist battleground era, by my teenage years, my views fell decidedly to the left on social issues and I even wrote a term paper in high school supporting the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment.  My high school library carried numerous feminist-oriented books, which in retrospect seems odd for a rural school district.  I read  The Feminine Mystique along with numerous books on suffragists, like Susan B. Anthony and  Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and also some off-the-wall books on female sexuality written from rabidly anti-male viewpoints, where all heterosexual relations ended up categorized as akin to rape.  I approached, what I thought was a well-reasoned position, based on my youthful and naive obsession with the left’s favorite canard: “fairness”.  Woe be it that anything should be unfair, so I aligned my views accordingly.

Of course in typical, contradictory female fashion, I adored old-fashioned male heroes and found these chivalrous perfect specimens with  the best of male traits – a gentleman, who lived by a strict code of honor, a protector of the weak, a romantic at heart, but tough enough to tackle any and all dastardly villains – yes, these ideal men lived on in popular historical romance novels.  Truly, based on the millions of women, of all ages, who devour these historical romance novels, my romantic vision ran counter to my rather dismal political view, where men and women spiritually exist on different planets, destined to always be misunderstood and circling in distant orbits.  What romantic heart wants a spouse who is not part of a united team?  Well, that is currently where the state of marriage resides far too often and despite all these media experts on relationships, divorce statistics bare out the dismal disconnected state of way too many couples.  The basic belief required for any successful endeavor, as part of any group, is believing you are part of a team and in marriage, if you don’t believe you’re part of a team, conflict, anger and disloyalty will doom any hope for a happy home.  Building trust gets short shrift to a lot of psychobabble that leaves many couple regurgitating catchy jargon rather than on building trust.  With trust, relationships and teams can navigate almost any adversity.

Fast forward to the present, thirty plus years later, and I’ve been reading these articles at PJ Media, written by this young man, John Hawkins, who presents his views on men, women and relationships often.  His piece titled: 5 Reasons Men Cheat, (here), where he began with a disclaimer that he wasn’t justifying cheating, then proceeded to do just that with reasons like “the woman let herself go”, “he’s stuck in a sexual desert” and “he’s bored”.  His views struck me as very ambivalent toward women and marriage, while still yearning for a worthy woman.

In fairness, he wrote a column on types of annoying men, but his, 7 Types of Chicks Who Annoy Everyone by their Very Existence, (here) had me laughing, while simultaneously picking out the types that might fit me to any degree.  Oh no, I might posses a good bit of the dreaded Detailerella, getting caught up in telling every last tiny detail and what if my personality has a smidgeon of the pathetic Pity Vampire or perhaps I sometimes add too much drama to my stories, let me vow to never utter a dramatic sigh ever again, lest the dreaded tag of No Drama Mama, gets added to my moral failings.  Throughout his columns, I noticed he sounds bitter about women and the quest for a meaningful relationship with a woman, but the larger issue that struck me is whether his is a majority male view in his age group or an anomaly.  The other serious issue is – are the majority of young women like these 7 types he presented?  If so, then the hope for stronger families, where committed marriages succeed seems decidedly on a downward spiral.  Many reports abound offering reasons why the average age of first marriages keeps climbing, with the level of college debt being offered as a prime culprit – Huffington Post 2012 article(here), but considering the alarming attitudes pop culture icons and relationship experts peddle, it seems likely that basic attitudes about the opposite sex play into this trend too.

Did unbridled politicization of our most private relationships lead to this wasteland of angry, hostile male/female interactions?  Is the concept of heterosexual marriage as a vital team and required anchor of civilization, out of date and obsolete?  Listening to the media experts and pop culture mouthpieces, it appears that this view could get one cast into the pit of narrow-minded hate-mongers, deserving of only scorn and isolated from civil society.    Judging by the dollars spent on romantic fiction, consumed almost exclusively by women, in the secret recesses of many a female hearts, beats the desire for these extinct gentlemen of days gone by.  And just how do these stories always end, well, the man of her dreams comes along and sweeps her off  her feet, professes  undying love and devotion, followed by a old-fashioned, happily-ever-after marriage.  They become a team, so once again, my belief in building the most basic team in civilization, lives on in the hearts of millions of women, judging by the number of romance novels sold ($1.4 Billion in 2010 – according to this former female political science professor, who takes a dim view of these novels- here).

An anecdote to pop culture views on the importance of being a lady or a gentleman came in the form of a book, Simple Social Graces, (available here), that I purchased years ago.  I imagined it would, be some frilly book on Victorian etiquette, when to my dismay it ranks as one of the most insightful  looks at our current cultural demise juxtaposed with a refreshing look at our Victorian ancestors views and remedies for most of society’s ills.  I’ve read this book many times and find it an important look at how setting societal ideals can guide us to a kinder, gentler society, where respect for other people reigns supreme in all our interactions, both public and private.  Until we return to a basic societal acceptance that the answers to our cultural morass can be fixed only by our own insistence that we agree upon and enforce a simple code of honor in society, where we insist on treating others with respect, insist that the strong protect the weak, and realize that civilization rests on whether we can rebuild that American team, I wax on about frequently.  If parents can only succeed at one thing, then most assuredly teaching them to respect others ranks as the most important lesson, providing a lifeline to our society poised to descend into a moral abyss.  These are my simple home remedies for what ails us and at least it’s less risky than some of my great-grandmother’s teas made from assorted weeds, which she sent me out into the nearby fields to gather.  To her credit she cooked up an excellent drawing salve made from the knots on pine trees, that she claimed worked for farm animals and people too, that I wish I had saved the recipe.  It healed cuts and scrapes faster than these modern anti-biotic creams and ointments, but could end up causing a visit from a social worker in this day and age, where the government regulates everything.  Respect is free and so far the government hasn’t regulated it:-)

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture Wars

The Tea Party Lives

On Wednesday the junior Senator, Rand Paul, from Kentucky breathed life back into the Tea Party movement with his gutsy filibuster, while rankling the old goats of the GOP.  He showed the disenchanted Republicans throughout the country that one voice does matter and one citizen committed to the Constitution can force even hard-nosed political operators, like Eric Holder, to respond. Paul explains his motivations and beliefs in this Washington Post article (here).   So far, Holder deflected answering the Fast and Furious questions honestly, trying to change the message and hoping time will distance the demands for answers.  Considering Holder honed his political muscle in the corrupt and overreaching Reno Justice Department, Rand’s feat played out as one of those David and Goliath moments, where one man, taking a principled stand,  stood against the political powers that be in Washington and actually won.  Holder caved and responded to Paul’s demand for an answer on the limits on drone strikes (here) on American soil.  Even the reliably left-slanted Slate website carried a piece headlined, Rand Paul: Filibuster Shows “Americans Are  Looking for Someone to Really Stand Up, (here).  Ted Cruz, Texas’s newest  Senator,  jumped into the filibuster and let’s be hopeful that he continues speaking up and taking on the fight for responsible federal spending,  serious debt reduction, and championing  limited federal governance as our constitutional republic demands (he turned me into an admirer already).

Typically, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, rushed to the nearest microphones to deride Rand Paul’s filibuster, because these two windbags seem to be the self-appointed airwaves traffic controllers for the GOP, believing they direct the GOP media efforts and set the GOP agenda.   Paul’s shining moment angered these two , because for once Americans saw that there’s a new GOP wind blowing in Washington.  No one cares what John McCain says and while Eric Holder’s tenure as Attorney General causes one to shudder in horror, the specter of Lindsey Graham running the Justice Department offers not a bit more comfort.  Just like a McCain presidency most likely would offer little more coherence than Obama’s, considering McCain’s  murky, shifting positions on national security issues and his need to be popular rather than right on the issues.   Truth be told, their constant rush to get on every cable news outlet and hog the spotlight diminishes them to merely cartoon-like stature and considering how many times they flipped positions on national security issues, the Obama administration’s strong-arm tactics and just about every other important issue, do Republicans even care about what they say?   The left-leaning media elites keep shamelessly using these two useful idiots for the Democrats and even President Obama makes use of their preening need to get in front of any camera within a mile.  Does anyone think President Obama’s reach-across-the-aisle dinner came about for any reason other than to improve his sinking poll numbers over his overplayed hand on sequestration?  Only dupes like McCain and Graham could be that gullible. And how dare these GOP upstarts garner some national media attention, without first seeking their blessings, seems to sum up their angry reaction to Rand Paul’s  impressive filibuster.   This President doesn’t compromise as he relentlessly plods along with his transformation of America into a socialist mecca, where government of, by and for the people gets buried by executive fiat,  in favor of government “takes care” of the people – literally, if you don’t like it,  the government will most assuredly “take care”  of you, Chicago-style.  PJ Media writer, Michael Walsh, penned a scathing review of John McCain’s actual biography, hinting that the automatic hero-worship aura, may finally be approaching an end (here).  Hope springs eternal, in this season,  where mayhap some new conservative voices will burst into bloom and the old goats get put out to pasture to chew their cud (here).

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, The Constitution

Hillary’s Top Achievements

January 1, 2013, I posted a piece asking for anyone to list Hillary Clinton’s top diplomatic achievements and finally my query has been answered, by a loyal Democratic mouthpiece no less.  Bob Beckel moments ago appeared on “The O’Reilly Factor” and the discussion started out about the latest State Department embarrassment over a female Egyptian activist, Samira Ibrahim who was scheduled to receive an International Women of Courage Award tomorrow from our new Secretary of State, John Kerry.  Her award was postponed when her gleeful postings about terrorist attacks killing Israelis and other sundry postings praising Hitler and the 9/11 attack were found on her Twitter account. The Washington Post story is here.  One might think some careful vetting by the Hillary Clinton State Department would be standard operating procedure, but alas apparently not.  Most likely no one will ever whisper who suggested these women or who was responsible for vetting them, but it’s just one more symptom of a department adrift with no real leadership.

Bill O’Reilly asked Bob Beckel to list the top achievements of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and I’ve been waiting for someone………. anyone at all, to tackle that question.  Beckel listed that Hillary strengthened  NATO, she expanded women’s rights in China and she increased Poland’s security.  Prodded by O’Reilly to amplify on these stupendous achievements, Beckel mumbled idiotic supporting statements, like NATO is stronger, because she made other countries take on more responsibility.  Poland is safer because she denied Poland the US missile defense system that President Bush had promised them and her greatness speaking about women’s rights in China led to an actual increase in women’s rights in China (well not so much, but hey Beckel thinks it is so).  Sometimes less is more, but that usually refers to make-up advice and style advice, both areas that Hilliary’s feminist feathers would most assuredly be ruffled if she had to trifle with.  No, she deals with the important issues in the world where according to Beckel, she makes an institution stronger by less American leadership, she makes a country’s national security stronger by weakening it’s defenses and she expands women’s rights in a country merely by the power of her words.  What a woman.  It must be similar to the way she takes responsibility by not taking any responsibility and brazenly and with righteous indignation spouts, “What difference at this point does it make.”, to deflect questions about the cause of the attack on the consulate in Benghazi.  She preceded this with mentioning the lame video rationale or whether these people were just out for a walk and decide to attack and kill some Americans, but no where did she touch on the possibility that it might have been a premeditated, coordinated attack and after all, in her mind, “what difference does it make”.   And here I thought the touting her frequent flyer mileage as testament to her remarkable diplomatic achievements hit the low water mark on lame-brained sycophantic drivel from the left, but leave it to Bob Beckel to prove me wrong.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics

Soviet MIA Soldier Found Alive In Afghanistan

Scott Neuman posted a news story March 6, 2013 at NPR on a missing Soviet soldier who was found alive in Afghanistan after 33 years(story here).  He reports that Bakhretdin Khakimov, a soldier in a motorized rifle unit went missing after being severely injured in a battle against Afghan mujahadeen forces and was picked up by local Afghans.  The story goes on to relate that Khakimov converted to Islam, married an Afghan woman and works as a traditional healer in Herat province.  Even though it’s not one of our MIAs, it’s still heartwarming to know another case of a missing soldier moved to the found pile.

Leave a comment

Filed under Military

Our Ever Useful Idiots

Just when you thought  Sean Penn holds the title of most dimwitted celebrity foreign policy adviser, along comes Dennis Rodman.   Rodman, for reasons that defy rational thought, embraced the pudgy new leader of one of the most despotic regimes on earth, North Korea, and wonders be, serendipity struck as they found affinity through their mutual love of basketball.  If you found Field Of Dreams  tested your tolerance for sports-centered fantasy, take a stiff drink before you ponder Rodmans’ surreal meandering foray into the world of international affairs (here).  Prison camps, millions of starving citizens, chest-thumping missile launches, threats of war – not to worry, Dennis assures us Kim is a humble man, his “friend” and he loves basketball.  What more could we desire in a leader?   Oh, wait, we have one of those that loves basketball, minus the humble part.   Laugh at your own peril though, our official policy, direct from John Kerry’s lips, intoned with that annoyingly oh-so-superior accent, sounds much like Rodman’s delusional take on his new best friend, Kim Jong-un, the inheritor of the dictatorship of North Korea.  Last week Kerry held out that olive branch of direct negotiations with Iran’s mullahs and Ahmadinejad (here), continuing the Obama doctrine of  embrace your enemies, while you stab your friends in the back.    Yes, he wants the mullahs in Tehran to know that the United States, despite years of intoning a stay tough with sanctions and no nukes for Iran mantra, really just wants to be friends………..  and we know, a’la our nuclear talks with Russia, that this administration excels at negotiations of this sort (thanks, Hillary)….. well ok, not so much.  It looks good to hold your hand out begging for talks, right?

As guests know their standing based on their place card location on the tables, foreign leaders gauge their standing with the United States much the same way.  Kerry embarked on his first official  trip to the Middle East as Secretary of State and he will visit with Mahmud Abbas today, but no visit with Israel is scheduled (here), continuing the Obama administration policy of placing Israel at a remote table off in a secluded corner, while all the miscreants of the world sit at the head table……… where perhaps they can share hoop dream fables and plan future golf outings.   Israel lives in a neighborhood, where they can’t indulge in such vacuous posturing,  knowing they’re facing an existential threat since the Arab Spring unleashed the Islamist hordes.   It’s much more important to this administration that they let the Muslim world know that the US plans to continue the cozy up to our enemies policy rather  than support our closest ally in the Middle East – Israel.

If the sequester-athon last week didn’t disgust you to the point of swearing off following politics completely, you probably didn’t miss this latest insult to your intelligence.  We are broke, yes broker than broke, according to President Obama.  Life as we know will cease because of the evil  Republicans’ unwillingness to compromise and avoid the fiscal grim reaper, swinging with broad strokes.  And then John Kerry announced $250 million  in aid to Egypt yesterday (here), as a bribe of sorts to encourage Egypt to reach an IMF agreement to secure a $4.8 billion loan package.  So, I guess we’re not really broke, broke, only broke on assuring  our national defense needs receive appropriate funding.   Most days lately it’s easier to skip the news than to face the relentless insults to our intelligence heaped out by this administration and the equally disingenuous posturing by the GOP tap dance champions, Graham and McCain, doing their shim sham shimmy routine (here), where they repeat the same steps, over and over and over.  You might conclude that Dennis Rodman’s pronouncements on North Korea rank as lame-brained  and worthy of only ridicule, but if you stop a second and listen to John Kerry’s foreign policy rhapsodizing (here) about lifting the world’s poor, fighting disease and promoting human rights,  the distance between Rodman and Kerry isn’t quite so far.  We all know Dennis Rodman hasn’t a clue about foreign policy.  However, lest anyone forget,  John Kerry referred to Bashar Assad as “my dear friend”, according to a Commentary magazine column by Michale Rubin in December 2012 (here), hinting that when it comes to rogue regimes he  carries on the proud leftist tradition of being useful idiots for communist thugs.   And just  like Rodman, Kerry hasn’t a clue about foreign policy either.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics

Pet Peeve #2 – Too Stupid To Survive

We Americans love to believe we’re the greatest nation on earth and at some point I believed this too, but as things go from dismal to dire, such delusions might well prove to be our undoing.  Since President Obama took office every step he’s taken pushes us closer to a point of economic collapse from whence we won’t be able to recover.  He deflects attention like a political  Wizard of Oz, waving his hands, telling us to pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, while he systematically dismantles (transforms) our country into a country ruled by executive fiat.  Republicans run around in disarray with only enough discipline to form a circular firing squad when the Democrats lob the next legislative fire bomb .  No need to wait for impact, these GOP clowns shoot each other long before then, making this era of democratic scorched earth policy an unnecessary redundancy.  Both sides provide a decidedly sickening display of gutless, self-serving antics that is it any wonder no problems ever get resolved?  We’re stuck on a endless political hamster wheel,  round and round and round we go with phoney fiscal crises, fabricated doomsday hysterics, all pasted together with the brainwashing chant of some new catchphrase the media willingly repeats thousands of times a day.  A couple months ago it was “fiscal cliff”, today it’s “sequestration”.   The Democrats perfected this technique of public brainwashing decades ago and it works – repeat the same hypnotic talking point, using the same phrases and all of a sudden the general public follows along , not even caring where they’re being led.

Our government loves to warn us about China and Russia.  Beware they’re doing all these dangerous things that run counter to our American interests.  Well, yes they do and what does America do?  We run around creating a fiscal plague, poised to wipe out life as we know it and we want to take the moral high-ground???   China has been buying up US real estate for decades and American companies, but we pretend it isn’t happening.  We want all the cheap consumer goods, because our lazy, slovenly citizenry can never have too much junk, yet we mouth hollow rhetoric about how great we are and how evil they are.  There’s enough scary stuff written about Putin to fill a library and yet, as I watch how he leads, I sure wish we had even one leader in America with his backbone – just one!  It’s time to pay attention and realize that the leaders in Russia and China watch us and frankly they’re worried that we might pull the entire world into a financial tailspin.  They’re  unloading foreign exchange currency (US dollars) for gold, in hopes of boosting their chance of survival (here, here, and here).   They’re seeking secure energy resources, while we have this President and his EPA albatrosses wrapped around our necks, strangling the last breath of economic freedom from us.  They have leaders and we have this sorry excuse in Washington and sometimes I laugh at how ridiculous it is to hear American officials, like our illustrious former Madame Secretary of State railing about Putin or lecturing the Chinese.   In my heart, I long for real leaders in America again.

What  does it say about us when our most popular export isn’t our American values, but Honey Boo Boo?   She’s the perfect face of our American decline:  a chubby, rude, beauty pageant queen, prone to temper-tantrums and embarrassing public displays.  As a child, I loved watching re-runs of Shirley Temple movies and comparing real talent beside this bratty child, being exploited on TLC (The Learning Channel) of all places makes me cringe.  It’s a perfect example of American culture.  We have  a History Channel where no real history can be found, but you learn about the pawn business, trucking in Alaska and  alien visits.  We have music channels where they play no music and  news channels with more punditry than news reporting.   Since words no longer carry concrete definitions it seems quite fitting that we prefer to live in a perpetual state of national delusion, believing our financial Armageddon can’t happen to us,  – we’re so great.  So, while we slouch, sag, and vegetate and our elected officials point fingers at each other, many other countries have leaders preparing for the future.  Are we too stupid to survive?    Sad to think that we just might be…..

Leave a comment

Filed under Pet Peeves, Politics