Category Archives: Politics

Winners and Losers

Hillary won the debate, if you judge on being prepared and coming with canned sound bites. She won by not coughing or collapsing.  She received all soft-ball questions and was treated with great deference by Lester Holt.  She came as the smug, sanctimonious, gloating Queen.

Trump knew nothing, seemed rattled and defensive many times.  He was combative, rude, completely unprepared.  He offered nothing that sounded remotely like a Republican or conservative policy. He came as the smug, mega-rich con man, NY liberal Democrat, Reality TV star.

He was the same Trump who won the GOP nomination with the media giving him billions in free media and touting, “Trump doesn’t play by the rules”, “he’s winning”, etc. etc.  No one seems to care about how the media elites came to be giving one GOP candidate all that free media or how they failed to report these mountains of negative news stories, they’re dumping now.

The Washington Post has 20 reporters working on digging up dirt on Trump, with one reporter breathlessly reporting each new allegation about the Trump Foundation on Twitter, but nothing about the Clinton Foundation or Hillary’s email server. While the media should have been digging into her server during the last year, they were busy selling the GOP Insurgent.

Trump lost last night’s debate, by any measure of a candidate being competent on public policy,  just like he lost every GOP primary debate, by that metric.  The difference last night was the liberal media wasn’t spinning him as an Insurgent or proclaiming he’s above the rules, like they did in the primary.  Holt didn’t ask one question about the just released FBI notes, Benghazi, her role in Libya, which all go to her job performance as Secretary of State.  She was allowed to gloat about all the miles she traveled as Secretary of State, while being absolved from having to answer for her conduct or the results of all her travel.

Not sure any of that matters, because the media lost big time last night – the bias was so overt and palpable, that it smacked you in the face – no questions on Benghazi, Libya, the just released FBI Notes, the multiple terrorists attacks in the past week in America.

Instead, there were long blocks devoted to Trump’s support of invading Iraq (when he was a private citizen), but no question to Hillary, when she voted for it as a Senator.

Then there was the birtherism again.  Sure, plenty of Americans who bought into that are out and out racists, but President Obama’s own actions of putting Islamist apologists in charge of policing “Islamophobia” and such semantical word games, like calling the Islamist massacre at Fort Hood “workplace violence,” also feed the distrust many Americans feel about President Obama.

The media is complicit in downplaying the growing Islamist radical threat in America.

The Obama administration’s blind-eye to the rising ISIS-inspired attacks on American soil might end up upstaging Hillary’s canned sound bites and liberal media gloating. In the last week, there was the explosion in NYC/NJ, there was the mall stabbing Somali in MN that same night.  There was also a mall shooting in Washington state, by a Turkish immigrant.   Lester Holt didn’t even mention anything about these attacks in his questions.

Holt  did mention cybersecurity and Hillary rattled off a response.  This woman, who set up an unsecured email server,  who allowed highly sensitive information to be exchanged on her server, and who can’t even keep track of her own blackberries and ipads,  wasn’t asked how she was competent to deal with anything pertaining to “cybersecurity”.

This obvious win might end up damaging her in a few days, especially as the media colludes with her gloating and overplaying her “win”.  There’s also all her emails out there waiting to be leaked….

There’s also the lurking question about the FBI’s handling of her email server investigation, which the media seems determined to bury too.

Seems to me like it might end up like her arrogant “basket of deplorables” speech.

The real loser last night was the American people and how so many Americans support these two vile LIARS fills me with fear for our republic.

4 Comments

Filed under Corrupt Media Collusion, General Interest, Hillary's Email Scandal, Politics, ThatWitch2016, The Media

Hillary & her Bimbos at work (from the FBI notes)

The latest Friday FBI dump contains 189 pages, with much of the identifying information redacted, making it another process of elimination, as to who is being interviewed, based on who else is mentioned in that interview.  Comey’s charade with these releases has nothing to do with transparency, but everything to do with his trying to salvage his reputation and also bury this story with information overload.  There’s so much politically-damaging information about the Obama administration, in general, the State Department, in specific, and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, in totality, that as you read along, the Keystone Cop optics, of a bunch of dimwitted BIMBOS  at work, makes you wonder if the cast of Clueless was running the State Department, with Alicia Silverstone playing the role of Secretary of State.

The national security implications aren’t just that every half-decent foreign intelligence agency has all of her email traffic from her private server. It’s a foregone conclusion, that assuredly due to her being a high-value intelligence target for them, and her server being completely unsecured, it was hacked. There’s no way the Russians missed this opportunity. The other side of the national security equation is she and her cadre of bungling bimbos might be running our nation’s national security after November and plenty of Americans seem okay with that.

Her email server highlights the Clinton corruption, but the cover-up speaks to President Obama. His entire administration, to include him, engaged in risky handling of national security information. He was emailing her at her private email address. The IG had cited the US embassy in Japan, run by Caroline Kennedy, as another huge national security nightmare, due to risky personal email use.

Back when the Ukraine mess started, Russia leaked an intercepted phone call, between State Dept. flunkie, Victoria Nuland, and the US ambassador in Kiev, to western media. Nuland was using an unsecured phone. That should have been the end of her career, but she laughed it off and Jen Psaki, State Department spokeswoman, said:

“We think this is a new low in Russian tradecraft, in terms of publicizing, posting,” Psaki told reporters yesterday in Washington.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/…

It wasn’t a new low for the Russians – it was excellent intelligence-gathering and savvy propaganda use of that intelligence. These fools in the Obama administration have no clue about national security. The “new low” was that this stupid woman, Nuland, with her “expertise” on RUSSIA, used an unsecured phone to talk to the US ambassador in UKRAINE, knowing how the Russians monitor American embassies and personnel, especially in Ukraine. This is the cluelessness.

This latest batch of FBI notes shows one of Hillary’s flunkies telling the FBI that she was verbally reprimanded for leaving a briefing book:

“Hanley was given “verbal security counseling” after she accidentally left a classified document and a sensitive “briefing book” in a Russian hotel suite she was using with Clinton.

Diplomatic security officers “found a classified document from the briefing book in the suite during a sweep following Clinton and Hanley’s departure” and later told Hanley “the briefing book and the document should never have been in the suite.””

http://www.washingtonexaminer….

Hillary and these BIMBOS will be running foreign policy and entrusted to keep us safe, if Hillary is elected…

Unfortunately, Trump picks people like Roger Stone, Lewandowski, Pierson, Manafort, Kellyanne and Bannon, which isn’t very reassuring.

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Hillary's Email Scandal, Politics, ThatWitch2016

Same old Public Corruption

The media’s news hounds leaped on the news that Ted Cruz announced he will endorse Donald Trump, but they are completely AWOL on investigating Hillary’s email server scandal, other than giving it the most cursory reporting, before dismissing it and jumping back into exposing Trump’s corruption.

Trump’s corruption needs to be exposed, but so does the Clinton corruption and most assuredly, the media needs to quit selling the Obama administration “narratives” and report on the Obama corruption, which has now led to the corruption of the FBI.  The partisan reporting results from the liberal media’s partisan political ideology.

This post jumps around a bit and it goes way beyond Cruz’ lack of integrity, to the  WHOLESALE PUBLIC CORRUPTION.

Ted Cruz endorsed Trump today, so you know Cruz thinks there’s some political advantage for himself in this.  I’ve never felt comfortable with Cruz’ character.  So, Trump insulted Cruz’ wife and went along with the story that Cruz’ father was present with Lee Harvey Oswald and yet, Ted Cruz, for personal political gain, can still endorse Trump???  I suspect most #NeverTrump people will cave in the end.

Back in May, I posted “A GOP Post Mortem”.  I don’t know if the Cruz’ father/JFK story is pure fiction, if there’s some connection between his father and Lee Harvey  Oswald or Cuban intelligence, or if Cuban/Russian intelligence fabricated this entire story as a disinformation effort, BUT something is VERY wrong with this story appearing in the middle of an American election in 2016 (especially with all the overt Russian intelligence interference in our election).  I sure would like to know, not only if there’s anything to this story (unlikely as that may be), even more so, I would like to know WHERE this story originated and how it ended up in the National Enquirer.

The email leaks, all over the place, keep illuminating all sorts of corruption and also a concerted foreign effort to interfere in our election.  Trump’s campaign is as corrupt as Hillary’s and geesh, Corey Lewandowski is still drawing a paycheck from Trump, while he’s working for CNN.  I wonder if he’s being paid by Clinton operatives too.  Speaking of operatives, David Brock, the Media Matters/Soros front guy, is running 14 Pro-Clinton operations out of his office.  Zero Hedge blog states:

Submitted by Andrew Kerr via The Citizens Audit,

This is serious.

  • David Brock operates over a dozen pro-Clinton organizations from his office in Washington DC.
  • Uncovered records expose a constant flow of money between his organizations.
  • Brock’s unregistered Professional Solicitor, the Bonner Group, receives a 12.5% cut every time money is moved.

There’s a reason why David Brock chooses to house an unregistered Professional Solicitor in his office to raise money for his conglomerate of Super PACs and non-profits.

Professional Solicitors are required to disclose their active solicitation contracts.  Brock wants his unregistered solicitor, the Bonner Group, to keep their client list hidden for a very specific reason.

David Brock is laundering money

David Brock has 7 non-profits, 3 Super PACs, one 527-committee, one LLC, one joint fundraising committee, and one unregistered solicitor crammed into his office in Washington DC.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-20/money-laundering-scheme-exposed-14-pro-clinton-super-pacs-non-profits-implicated

I wonder if the FBI will bother to investigate this…  What a joke.  Comey will find some excuse, Brock’s just “extremely careless” with his accounting or something…

There’s a Washington Post reporter, David Fahrenthold,  hot on the trail, exposing the Trump Foundation corruption, but he doesn’t bother to even look at the Clinton Foundation corruption.  Kurt Eichenwald, at Newsweek,  wrote a lengthy piece, detailing all the dubious foreign connections in Trump’s financial empire and the Trump Foundation, but he completely exonerated the Clintons with their Clinton Foundation….  sure, “nothing to see there, just move along”.  This is the partisan liberal press at work – they work to cover-up for the Clintons, at every turn.  Andrea Mitchell is so overtly a Hillary cheerleader, that the Hillary campaign should be paying her as a campaign spokesperson.

Trump and the Clintons are the same CORRUPTION!  There is no better between them.

I won’t vote for Hillary or Trump – I just can’t!  This entire election was a fraud perpetrated on the American people.  Both Hillary and Trump are corrupt to the core.  Their foundations are cesspools of public corruption.  These two are sociopaths to the nth degree, so assuredly this debate will be interesting to see how they try to destroy each other.  Let’s see if the crazy eye fells Hillary or if she gets Trump to go full “loose cannon”, which isn’t that far-fetched, considering her screeching tirades can make just about anyone go berserk…

Here we are, days away from the first presidential debate and the FBI dumps 189 pages of heavily redacted interview notes, at the end of the day, on a Friday.   Comey was part of the cover-up in Hillary’s email scandal.  He caved to the Obama/Clinton pressure.  Cheryl Mills was granted immunity as a witness and then allowed to be present for Hillary’s FBI interview, as one of Hillary’s lawyers???  What the hell kind of corrupt bullshit is that?

Monday, June 27, 2016:  Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Phoenix.

Saturday, July 2, 2016:  There’s this shifty FBI interview set-up, with Hillary on  a Saturday morning on a HOLIDAY WEEKEND, at the FBI Headquarters in Washington – when LOTS of FBI employees were off (fewer witnesses).  The entire interview was jut a charade and Comey is a LIAR – he covered this up.  Who was actually present is an interesting question – out of Hillary’s team of lawyers, the FBI  redacted ONE name from the notes.  It listed David E. Kendall, Cheryl D. Mills, Heather Samuelson, Katherine Turner.  The NY Times, back in July, reported that other lawyer as Amy Saharia, but I doubt that is the truth.  It makes NO sense to redact her name.  The FBI redacted the names of THREE DOJ officials present.  Who the heck was present on a Saturday morning, on a long holiday weekend???  It’s a cover-up.

Tuesday , July 5, 2016: In the morning, after this long holiday weekend,  FBI Director Comey makes his bizarre announcement that there would be no criminal charges.

So, when we get to the FBI releasing the notes from Hillary’s interview, in the first paragraph, the FBI redacted one of her lawyer’s names and three DOJ officials’ names.

There are several redactions on who was present from the DOJ.  The FBI Notes list two people from the DOJ/FBI side and have three names redacted, which comes to 5 names, although the NY Times story says there were 8 DOJ/FBI people present, so who are 3 redacted names + 3 others mentioned in the NY Times story???  Something is very wrong when you compare the NY Times report to the FBI Notes.

It’s suspicious and my bullshit detector says, Comey/Lynch/Obama/Bill Clinton scammed us.  Back in the beginning of September, I wrote “Who was there?“:

“On July 2, 2016, the New York Times reported:

Accompanying Mrs. Clinton into the meeting were her lawyer David E. Kendall; Cheryl D. Mills and Heather Samuelson, longtime aides who are also lawyers; and two lawyers from Mr. Kendall’s firm, Williams & Connolly, Katherine Turner and Amy Saharia.

Eight officials from the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice conducted the interview, according to a person who was familiar with the substance of the session but declined to be named because the meeting was private. This person characterized the meeting as “civil” and “businesslike.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/03/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-emails.html?_r=1

When we get the answer to who was there, we will know fully the extent of the Obama administration corruption, to help bury the Clinton email server scandal for Hillary.  James Comey , Mr. Integrity, allowed the FBI to become a part of the cover-up, I believe.    The “extremely careless” was in leaving clues, like this redacted name of a Clinton lawyer that makes no sense.  Who is left to investigate corruption, when the FBI is corrupted too??

So, Ted Cruz’s perfidy today didn’t even phase me really, because all along I kept mentioning, that while he spouted the conservative message, every move he made was calculated for personal political advantage.  His integrity was suspect all along.

I doubt very many people in positions of power in America still possess even an iota of integrity.

Trump or Hillary…. it won’t matter, both are a further descent into lawlessness and wholesale public corruption.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Corrupt Media Collusion, General Interest, Hillary's Email Scandal, Politics, Public Corruption, The Media

Some important facts in Charlotte case

The problem about ascertaining facts in these high-profile race cases is important.  The family of the black man, shot by a police officer in Charlotte, has presented him as a family man and insists he was sitting in his car reading a book.

The Charlotte Observer reports the previous record for Keith Lamont Smith, as follows:

“A public records search shows that Scott was convicted in April 2004 of a misdemeanor assault with a deadly weapon charge in Mecklenburg County. Other charges stemming from that date were dismissed: felony assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, and misdemeanors assault on a child under 12, assault on a female and communicating threats.

In April 2015 in Gaston County Court, Scott was found guilty of driving while intoxicated.

In 1992, Scott was charged in Charleston County, S.C., with several different crimes on different dates, including carrying a concealed weapon (not a gun), simple assault and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. He pleaded guilty to all charges.

Scott also was charged with aggravated assault in 1992 and assault with intent to kill in 1995. Both charges were reduced, but the disposition of the cases is unclear.

According to Bexar County, Texas, records, Scott was sentenced in March 2005 to 15 months in a state jail for evading arrest. In July of that year, records show, he was sentenced to seven years in prison on a conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. A Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman said Scott completed his sentence and was released from prison in 2011.”

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Politics

Out of the Mouths of Babes

While the mainstream media remains immersed in this stupid Clinton/Trump Twitter finger-poinitng on “he started it”/”no she started it”,  in regards to the President Obama birther issue, and we’re still titillated by General Colin Powell’s “#DickingBimbos, calling it like he sees it” personal emails leak, here’s what every American, especially our leaders need to be aware of and alarmed about. –

Russian active measures

Back in January 2013, I wrote a blog post, “Putin By A Mile”, where I mention a debate with the older of my two sons:

“Later one of my sons brought up a continuing discussion we’ve had for a long while now and finally I think he sees my point of view.  When I first mentioned to him that if  it came to picking Vladimir Putin vs Barack Obama for a hypothetical geopolitical competition , I’d pick Putin in a heartbeat.  When this conversation began a year or so ago, my son would list off all the “evils” that are Putin, such as the alleged polonium poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko (here) and his KGB  past.  The following is my reasoning for picking Putin.”

I went on to say:

“Here are  some of the things I considered.  This all goes back to something I mentioned in a previous post that I think  knowing people always trumps knowing “about” people.  Years ago, I read a book that I had signed out from our local library that was Putin’s first lengthy interview with a western reporter.  His answers provided clues to how he thinks about being a leader of his country and what his hopes and aspirations are for Russia”

And more of the same naive claptrap:

“While Putin’s actions do remain diametrically opposed to ours and most assuredly will produce future friction points, his actions make perfect strategic sense from the Russian viewpoint.  He aggressively has secured energy resources and engaged the US in nuclear arms wrangling where he certainly pushed and received the things that are advantageous to Russia.

Then we have Barack Obama where he refused to sign the Keystone Pipeline deal, he gave away too much in the nuclear arms dealing and he and Madame Secretary have made one after another terrible missteps, stabbing our allies in the back, while bowing and scraping to our adversaries.  He’s put us on the path to not only universal healthcare, but to being a universal third-rate bit player on the world stage.  If I were assessing how the strategic plane looks from others’ vantage points, I would wonder, “those stupid Americans, they don’t even have the national will to promote their own interests”.  And truly, any administration that utters a phrase like,”leading from behind” is worthy of only supreme contempt, in my opinion.

The ill-mannered TV reality urchin, Honey boo boo can keep Barack Obama, but as for me I’d pick Putin by a mile.”

Tonight my son was talking to me about Putin again and he knew from these many discussions over the years, that I had naive blinders on when it came to Putin, believing that the man who gave that first interview to a Western reporter, was the same man America is dealing with today.  I wasn’t seeing Putin as the very serious threat he is.  My son was right all along, as he’s been warning me, “Vladimir Putin is a very bad man!”… and I kept saying naive stuff,  like, “we should try to see the world from his eyes” and “at least he is a strong leader, looking out for Russian national interests”.

My son said, “Putin’s playing Alexander Dugin’s “Foundations of Geopolitics” perfectly.”

I had heard mention of this book, but didn’t really take it seriously.  My son told me he read it in Russian, while at college, and he hadn’t seen any English translation available online.  He told me about how a lot of hardline Russian nationalism was even apparent in Russia, 11 years ago, when he did a study abroad in Russia one summer.

I’ve been awakened in the past year to Russian actions dominating the world geopolitical sphere and usurping American influence around the world.

Of course, President Obama’s totally feckless and clueless foreign policy played right into the hands of all of America’s adversaries.

The book, “Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia”, written by Alexander Dugin and co-authored by General Nikolai Klokotov, in 1997, lays out an empire-building blueprint for Russia.   Wikipedia lays out a content listing of this book , which will give you an idea of Dugin’s Russian strategy. Wikipedia also states:

“Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, head of the International Department of theRussian Ministry of Defence, apparently advised in the project.[1] Klokotov stated that in the future the book would “serve as a mighty ideological foundation for preparing a new military command.””

Here’s another link with the table of contents only (I have not located an English translation of the book itself). 

In 2004, John B. Dunlop, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, wrote an article, “Russia’s New—and Frightening—“Ism”. Dunlop writes:

“Few books published in Russia during the post-communist period have exerted such an influence on Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites as Aleksandr Dugin’s 1997 neo-fascist treatise Osnovy geopolitiki: Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii(Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geo-political Future of Russia). The impact of this intended “Eurasianist” textbook on key Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of fascist ideas and sentiments during the late Yeltsin and the Putin periods.

Five years before President George W. Bush announced his “axis of evil,” Dugin had introduced three key neo-Eurasian axes: Moscow-Berlin, Moscow-Tokyo, and Moscow-Tehran. The basic principle underlying these three axes was said to be “a common enemy,” by which he meant the United States”

Dunlop continues further in the article on one of those axes:

“The most ambitious and complex part of Dugin’s program concerns the South, where the focal point is a Moscow-Tehran axis. “The idea of a continental Russia-Islamic alliance,” he writes, “lies at the foundation of anti-Atlanticist strategy. . . . This alliance is based on the traditional character of Russian and Islamic civilizations.” As the result of a broad Grand Alliance to be concluded with Iran, Russia-Eurasia will eventually enjoy realizing a centuries-old Russian dream of reaching the “warm seas” of the Indian Ocean. Russia is to enjoy “geopolitical access—in the first place, naval bases—on the Iranian shores.”

As the result of such an alliance, Dugin argues, Russia-Eurasia should be prepared to divide up the imperial spoils with “the Islamic Empire [of Iran] to the south.” Which part of the South should come under Russia? “What is the Russian South?” Dugin asks at one point in his book. He answers that it includes “the Caucasus [all of it],” “the eastern and northern shores of the Caspian,” “Central Asia [that is, all of the former Soviet republics],” plus Mongolia. Even these regions, he adds, should be seen “as zones of further geopolitical expansion to the south and not as ‘eternal borders of Russia.’” Turkey is seen as being almost as dangerous to Russia-Eurasia as are the United States and China. Turkish minorities must be provoked into rebellion, and there is a need, he stresses, to create “geopolitical shocks” within Turkey.”

Putin’s moves in Syria, in cahoots with the Iranians, is a key strategic  objective in the Dugin strategy. Above all else, according to the Wikipedia entry on Dugin’s “Foundations of Geopolitics”, is the strategic objective to:

“The book declares that “the battle for the world rule of [ethnic] Russians” has not ended and Russia remains “the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution.” The Eurasian Empire will be constructed “on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us.”[1]

Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia’s gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.[1]”

Further in the Wikipedia entry:

“The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: “the main ‘scapegoat’ will be precisely the U.S.”

In the United States:

Russia should use its special forces within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism. For instance, provoke “Afro-American racists”. Russia should “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.”[1]”

So, I admit, that I, like many Americans (especially Donald Trump),  have been very naive about Putin, because this Moscow/Tehran axis is already threatening American forces.  AND  these email leaks sure seem like CYBER WARFARE, to undermine Americans’ faith in our electoral process.  All those blog posts of mine, about how the Clinton SPIN and the Obama NARRATIVES are part of an INFORMATION WARFARE strategy and antithetical to American free speech principles, well, I think I am right about that and I also think there’s a great deal of Russian influence in that information warfare.

Here again, perhaps, my son has a better sense of the problem.  He said we might not find all sorts of active agents or active willing accomplices working for the Russians.  He said the entire Democratic Party and liberals, with their constant anti-Americanism, are ready-made USEFUL IDIOTS.  He said Americans, due to celebrity cult worship and failure to study history, are a ready-made army of USEFUL IDIOTS.   Even the Russian interference in our election has been turned into a partisan debate, making it difficult to cut through these partisan blinders and get Americans to wake-up and see the threats beyond America.

In high school, I had a German/Russian teacher, who was a retired US Army translator.  He actually helped fuel my interest in military strategy, with his love of  WWII Army war footage, where he seemed to have the Army vault at his disposal.  He would explain all sorts of historical stuff and he knew a lot about Nazi propaganda.  I took 4 years of German and 2 of Russian (remember very little of either), but I remember in my Russian class, which consisted of me and a handful of boys, we decided to order these pins to wear, with Russian phrases in Cyrillic.  I don’t know what happened to those pins, but the one pin, I sure think fits this election better than Hillary’s “Stronger Together” or Trump’s “Make America Great Again”.

The pin said: Русские идут (The Russians Are Coming)

8 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

What to tell Putin

Since we already know how Hillary’s reset with Russia turned out and Trump’s comments feed Putin’s foreign policy objectives, NOT America’s or our allies’, well, here’s what I think the next American president should do.

Keep in mind,  I had hoped Russia and the US could work together to defeat ISIS, but that didn’t happen.  Since President Obama and John Kerry grovel to Putin and Lavrov, Putin appears to have decided to capitalize on American weakness and feckless foreign policy.

Russia  is now buzzing American planes and Iran, Russia and China are harassing our ships in international waters, so the LAST thing Trump should be doing is praising Putin or promising some grand new relationship.

The next President should be telling Putin, loud and clear: “This is the only warning you will get. If your planes or ships harass American ships or planes, they will receive ONE warning only, to desist, or they will be treated as a lethal threat and neutralized.” And then offer some diplomatic mumbo-jumbo about how hopefully we can find some areas of mutual interest,  where we can work together, but the United States will defend its citizens, its soldiers, its allies and its military assets around the globe and that is NOT negotiable.”

And of course this message needs to be leaked to the press, so that all the other leaders acting aggressively toward American forces get the memo too.

Then follow through with dealing with the aggression, while clearly stating we hope to be able to move to a level of civilized discussions, IF our forces cease being harassed in international territory.  All the hysterical Sallies opining about starting the next world war, shouldn’t worry.  You don’t back down from bullies and Putin is certainly a bully.   Putin is also a very savvy geopolitical strategist and he will recognize that the old game, for our “leader from behind”, won’t work with an American leader, willing to lead from the front and defend American interests, EVERY day.

Sadly, I don’t believe Trump or Hillary have any potential to be anything other than self-serving, corrupt, extreme narcissists.  Oh well, I can still dream for a competent, honorable leader.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

A staged Clinton photo-op?

Speculation on the internet about Hillary Clinton using a body double has raged on since her collapse leaving a 9/11 ceremony.  Online there’s been minute dissection of all the details in the video of Hillary seen leaving Chelsea’s apartment Sunday, looking chipper and in good health.   The thing that struck me, as something was amiss, was the lack of Secret Service surrounding her and how some little girl could just run up to her and hug her – with no Secret Service reaction….  Stranger than fiction.

Here’s a link to an American Thinker piece: “Hillary’s Body Double: Am I Nuts, or What?” by Bill Schanefelt. He writes:

“I remember that old saw: “just because you’re paranoid that don’t mean they’re not out to getcha.”

Well, just because it’s an internet meme, that don’t mean Hillary ain’t got a body double.

I viewed the video at the New York Post thinking I’d get a laugh at the expense of conspiracy nuts, but what I got was a shocking wake-up!”

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/hillarys_body_double_am_i_nuts_or_what_.html

It’s obvious this “Hillary looking fine”  photo-op, with the little girl running up to her, was a staged photo-op.

Whether all of the participants were actors or just the little girl, I don’t know for sure.   With the Clintons being the Clintons (Epic Liars), nothing would surprise me.  For instance, President Bill Clinton launched airstrikes to divert attention away from his impeachment scandal in late 1998.  For the doubters, there was absolutely no strategic military purpose to Operation Desert Fox ( I wrote about that on the Excite message boards in 1998).   Those strikes played no role in any overarching military strategy to contain Saddam Hussein.  NONE.  The media tossed around the “wag the dog” charge for a bit, but then it was “time to move on”.

I will mention that the general, americanrommel, whom I mentioned in my Messages of mhere story, was a very public defender of Operation Desert Fox.  Then again, he retired suddenly from a high-profile overseas position, a bit before the impeachment saga.  If the scuttlebutt, about the circumstances of his retirement, circulating in the Army were true, I understand why he would sympathize with Bill Clinton about the  impeachment scandal.  That general, after impeachment, was recommended for a very high-profile overseas position – in the same area where he was serving when he retired….   Hard to imagine how he wasn’t considered a security risk, but then again THE RULES  on national security protocols only apply to the peons in the military and intelligence community.   Others, like General David Petraeus and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, are above the rules.

The Clintons delight in tossing out red meat agitation propaganda, to inflame the Republicans and conservative Clinton-loathers, to get them chasing it with abandon.  Then the liberal media, aiding and abetting the Clinton talking points, will come out and report on the crazy right-wing conspiracy nuts and how this is just another one of those “rabid, right-wing witch hunts”.

And on the right, there are some groups and individuals, who have invested a lot of time and money to take down the Clintons.  That is a fact.  I am going to state for the record, I am not aligned to any Republican or right-wing groups and my efforts since 1998, to expose the Clinton corruption, stem from my own experience during impeachment.   My reasons go way beyond my personal feelings.  I believe with the attack on me, assets from the US Army were used to attack a private citizen on American soil, based completely on fabricated “intelligence”.  I don’t even have a speeding ticket on my record, I have never owned a gun and I have never been involved in any political groups.  My “crime” was expressing my dangerous opinions, like “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW” on the Excite message boards in 1998.

I want the names of every last person, involved in orchestrating using the US Army for a personal political hit squad, exposed.   If the US military can be used as a personal political tool to attack private citizens, well, we have moved completely away from being a constitutional republic.  And, if my FREE speech, on freakin’ online message boards, espousing that I believe in the rule of law, is grounds for being attacked in my home by a retired general, then something is very, very wrong in America.   The only place I was commenting on politics was on those Excite message boards.  I had had no contact with that general since Desert Storm.

Would Hillary Clinton use a body double for some staged PR gambit, well, I have no doubt she might.  Then again I  personally know how far the Clintons will go to silence political opponents.  Proving it has been the hard part, so I understand those who will cast me as a nutcase.  Guess that makes me a crazy Lone Wolf……  whatever, my plans have always been non-violent and to follow the law, no matter what.

#DefendTheConstitutionAlways

 

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Messages of mhere, Military, Politics, Public Corruption, ThatWitch2016, The Constitution

Another “nothing to see here” timeline

Timelines fascinate me.  The Obama administration’s kowtowing to despots has encouraged Russia, China and Iran to escalate aggressive actions in international territories, against US ships and planes.  The most damaging image of American weakness, even worse than the images of Somalia during the Clinton years, was the Iranian seizure of US sailors back in January.  This incident serves as a prime example of the liberal media collusion to sell the Obama administration “narrative” and to aid and abet the administration to quickly bury this story.

President Obama and John Kerry were busily working out the ransom payments and pay-offs to Iran, the likes of which these recent plane loads of cash stories delivered to Iran are now raising eyebrows.

January 12, 2016Iran captures 10 US sailors and their two boats.

January 13, 2016Iran publishes embarrassing photos of US sailors on their knees.  The White House downplays the incident and Josh Earnest hypes John Kerry’s great diplomatic skills:

“White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said on Wednesday afternoon that Iran’s release of the soldiers “underscores the importance of the diplomatic lines of communication between” Kerry and his Iranian counterpart. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Earnest added, “We’re still trying to learn more about how exactly that all happened.””

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/iran-navy-sailors-images-217709#ixzz4KF7Noa8V

Here’s another example:

WASHINGTON, Jan 13 (Reuters) – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry thanked Iranian authorities on Wednesday for their cooperation in the release of 10 American sailors who were taken into custody in the Gulf and credited diplomacy with resolving the situation.

“I think we can all imagine how a similar situation might have played out three or four years ago, and fact that today this kind of issue can be resolved peacefully and efficiently is a testament to the critical role diplomacy plays in keeping our country safe, secure, and strong,” Kerry said in a speech at the National Defense University.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/john-kerry-iran-sailors_us_56967b53e4b0b4eb759cb3ec

Then we get to the US captain apologizing to Iran:

“The unidentified sailor apologized for mistakenly travelling into Iranian waters – contradicting claims the U.S. were forced to say sorry.

‘It was a mistake. That was our fault. And we apologize for our mistake,’ the sailor said, in a brief state TV clip posted on Twitter by a journalist with Iran’s Tasnim News Agency.

His comment was in response to a man holding a microphone, who asked in English, ‘How was the Iranian behavior with you?’

The sailor was also asked if they had a ‘special problem.’ The sailor responded, ‘We had no problem, sir.’

Reports from Iran suggest the Pentagon was forced to make a grovelling apology in a bid to get the sailors released, admitting they had traveled into sovereign waters by mistake – just days before the controversial nuclear agreement is set to go into force.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3397254/Pictured-Ten-U-S-sailors-captured-Iran-Revolutionary-Guard-RELEASES-snooping-row-naval-incursion.html

January 14, 2016 – CNN reports:

“In a few tense hours on Tuesday, the crisis had threatened to prove a major political embarrassment for Obama, particularly since the sailors were being held while he delivered his final State of the Union address. He didn’t mention the captives while he was speaking, instead highlighting the Iran nuclear deal as a top legacy achievement.
Pressed into crisis mode, Secretary of State John Kerry led U.S. diplomacy to free the sailors. He spoke five times by telephone to Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, with whom he bonded during tortuous negotiations last year over the nuclear deal.
Kerry told Zarif that “if we are able to do this in the right way, we can make this into what will be a good story for both of us,” a senior State Department official told reporter.
With the crisis resolved, Kerry thanked Iran on Wednesday and chalked up a victory for the administration.”
January 16, 2016 – Politico reported:
“As part of a prisoner swap with Iran, President Barack Obama granted clemency to seven men of Iranian origin either facing criminal charges in U.S. courts or already serving time in U.S. prison, an American official confirmed Saturday.”
Further in the story:
“While an official confirmed Obama issued seven grants of clemency in the deal with the Iranians, spokespeople at the Justice Department and the White House did not immediately release the names of those spared in the U.S. legal system.

However, Iran’s Fars news agency released seven names, which correspond with U.S. court records on pending or recent cases.”

And then this:

“A U.S. official confirmed charges were dropped in cases involving 14 individuals. The moves will allow those individuals to travel more freely outside Iran.

“The United States also removed any Interpol red notices and dismissed any charges against 14 Iranians for whom it was assessed that extradition requests were unlikely to be successful,” the official said.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/01/iran-deal-obama-grants-clemency-to-seven-217879

The liberal media ignores the facts, whenever the facts don’t promote their political agenda.

And beyond the Obama/Kerry selling out the US military on their great Persian carpet ride.  Where was the press asking probing questions about these Iranians release, just days after the release of our US sailors?  Here’s another one, where the timeline smells to high heaven.

As John Kerry’s great deals with Iran keep leaking out, I’m still waiting to see where, “we can make this into what will be a good story for both of us.”

If anything, Iran got piles of cash to fund weaponry and terror, Iran made out great on the hostage exchange, Iran waged a masterful propaganda campaign to make the US military look weak. And all John Kerry does is preen about his “grand diplomacy” and personal bonds with despots….

The truth is that Kerry’s bonding with the terrorist regime in Tehran has put US soldiers and sailors AT GRAVE RISK – he is encouraging aggression against our military by hostile actors.  You don’t back down from BULLIES!  You face them down, each and every time.


Update:

September 13, 2016 – “State Dept Has No Idea How Many Americans Imprisoned in Iran”

Yep,“if we are able to do this in the right way, we can make this into what will be a good story for both of us”… you can quote John Kerry, diplomat extraordinaire…

4 Comments

Filed under Corrupt Media Collusion, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism

More media collusion – CBS this time

CBS was caught editing Charlie Rose’s interview with former President Bill Clinton, about Hillary’s health. (Start at 0:38) and you can hear the EDITED version.

The Hill reports:

Bill Clinton sat down with CBS’s Charlie Rose on Monday to try to clear the air around questions regarding his wife’s health after she collapsed while getting into a van at a 9/11 memorial ceremony on Sunday.

“Well, if it is, then it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors,” Bill Clinton said when Rose asked him if Hillary Clinton was simply dehydrated or if the situation was more serious. “Frequently — well, not frequently, rarely, on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing’s happened to her when she got severely dehydrated, and she’s worked like a demon, as you know, as secretary of State, as a senator and in the year since.”

But the “CBS Evening News” version cut Clinton’s use of “frequently” out. And a review by The Hill of the official transcript released by the network shows that Clinton saying “Frequently — well, not frequently,” is omitted as well.”

The CBS excuse for completely changing the context from FREQUENTLY TO RARELY, with their editing , was explained as they edited to fit time constraints.  More media lying – and as CBS is part of the liberal media, in the tank for Hillary, this edit was obviously to help Hillary.

 

3 Comments

Filed under Corrupt Media Collusion, General Interest, Politics, Public Corruption, ThatWitch2016, The Media

A tweet on Trump, the con man

So there’s no doubt where I stand on politics, I remain:

#NeverTrump&NeverHillary
#SayNoToPublicCorruption
#NoMoreScorchedEarth

AND MOST OF ALL:

#DefendTheConstitutionAlways

Oh, yeah, I can add:

#JustQuitLYING

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Politics, Public Corruption, The Constitution