Category Archives: The Media

Mr. President, “You didn’t build that!”

“When a man ain’t got no ideas of his own, he’d ought to be kind o’ careful who he borrows ’em from.”

– Owen Wister (The Virginian)

More kumihimo and beading tutorials or a blog post, such is my dilemma.  As this day dwindles away, it’s obvious which choice won out for most of today.  I tried to listen to this vapid, clueless President of ours attempt one more shameless, face-saving measure with this address at West Point this morning, but frankly his smugness made my blood boil.

President Obama, in my opinion (worth about as much as him talking about hammers and nails), is singularly the most incompetent US President in my lifetime, possibly even in US history.  To say such, invites charges of, “you’re racist”, to which I am going to dare say what should have been said long ago, “this man is the shining example of Affirmative Action run amok!”  He rode the race card through America’s top universities,  not on his merits.  Then he found himself a lucrative living, ensconced in grievance politics in Chicago.  He knows absolutely nothing about military matters, leadership or foreign policy, yet he is who the American people chose to steer the ship of state in these very treacherous, troubled seas.

Even now, his support among blacks and other minorities remains solid, despite the stagnant American economy and many of them faring far worse under his many ill-conceived domestic policies.  They will still  jump up and defend him, no matter what.   His sycophantic supporters, particularly those in the media, still carry water for him, but around the world, other leaders see him for the weak waffler he is, which bodes poorly for America.

Today’s speech, following the Afghanistan dog and pony show, crossed my threshold for disingenuous grandstanding!  He just gave the Taliban the green light in Afghanistan with his attempt to look like a CINC, by showing up to rally the troops with a withdrawal speech on Memorial Day.  “Hooray, troops, we’re deserting the battlefield, be proud”, was his message….   Today at West Point, here is how he followed up the withdrawal speech, courtesy of the NY Times:

“America must always lead on the world stage,” he said. “But U.S. military action cannot be the only – or even primary – component of our leadership in every instance. Just because we have the best hammer does not mean that every problem is a nail.”

La, la, la, “…if I had a hammer…”  You can expect the Obama spin machine to nail us with three pennies worth of hollow sound bites. They still have no coherent strategy, but they’ve constructed a catchy metaphor.  This man wouldn’t know the difference between a common nail and a roofing nail.  He’s perfected constructing political straw men – no hammer and nails, Mom jeans optional, teleprompter required…

Mr. President, “You didn’t build that military!”, but we will give you full credit for dismantling it.  Rant over, back to learning basic beading, time to calm my nerves.

 

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics, The Media

#AmericanPaperTiger

“You’re not so tough without your car” – Kindergarten Cop (1990 movie)  or

“… without your teleprompter speeches!” – President Obama (2014 fantasy foreign policy)

If only a metastasized ideology could be killed in a surgical strike eliminating one man.  President Obama, now into a second term of floundering foreign policy, faces the cancer of radical Islam, spreading malignant cells, far and wide.  Since the Al Qaeda attack on 9/11/2001, American leaders prefer to hide behind euphemisms rather than grapple with the ugly side of Islamic-inspired terrorism.   We’ve moved from short-sighted and overly optimistic democratization planning  to a new, alarmingly vacuous, Obama foreign policy, with the intellectual underpinning of a text message:  #AmericanSurrender.

The Bush administration chose to hide behind a “War on Terror” and absolve Islamic leaders of responsibility for the very acts of terror they facilitated.  Hiding behind hollow rhetoric like “Islam means Peace”, while charging forward with an ill-conceived democratization of the Muslim world plan, Islamic-extremism blossomed.  The Obama approach, even more dangerously naive, now resorts to laughable hashtag foreign policy and an Al Qaeda leadership decapitation strategy via drone strikes.  Computer gaming and social media come of age, where Islamic-terrorists utilize Western technology to network and expand their real world operations and American leadership resorts to hiding behind hand-written hashtag placards, borrowed from the most shallow social-networking format.

The barbarians use western technology to achieve their real strategic aims, while our foreign policy leaders send impotent hand-written pleas to barbarians, whose name translates to something along the lines of “western education is sinful”.  Yes, I am sure these Islamist zealots really care what Michelle Obama says and will heed her hashtag plea…    If the rest of world is laughing at us, who can blame them.  It’s embarrassing, not to mention dangerous, to allow fools such as President Obama and the girls, to diminish American prestige to the point where American power really is the “paper tiger” Osama bin Laden ranted about in his many video diatribes.

Other pundits have written excellent commentary on this topic, so I’ll end my venting and provide their links:

#BringBackOurBalls – Mark Steyn’s deadly accurate hit.

George Will on “hashtag activism”

“Hillary and Boko Haram” – Rich Lowry at National Review

“5 Things the Media and Government Won’t Tell You About Boko Haram” – Robert Spencer at PJ Media

Ann Coulter, got the left tweeting-mad, adding  her own hashtag plea to the mix.

 

 

 

8 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Politics, The Media, Uncategorized

Dude, this was like two years ago…

My blogging adventure began in December 2013, bringing me late to the Benghazi reporting game.  However, then and now, there remain plenty of empty seats in this game.  The mainstream press finally seems to have shaken free of the hypnotic Obama chants of “change you can believe in” and has begun asking a few questions.  Diplomad made me think about how much bloggers have written on Benghazi vs those card-carrying press reporters.  We’ve heard so many lies, from Susan Rice’s Sunday spin marathon to yesterday’s Bret Bair interview of a former Obama staffer, who stated, “Dude, this was like two years ago!”.  Will the light of truth finally shine on Benghazi?  I doubt it.  So much has been ignored by the mainstream press, to shield this administration’s appalling dereliction of duty.  Hillary flew the coop to Peru, in the wake of Benghazi and Obama continued fund-raising.  Getting to the truth, well, let’s refer back to my September 22, 2013 post on Hillary’s illustrious blue-ribbon panel entrusted to investigate Benghazi, who didn’t bother to record the interviews  in their investigation.  Their staff took notes and they compiled summaries  –  here’s how important accuracy was to these high-profile panelists:

In addition, the Committee has been unable to assess with any specificity what
information witnesses conveyed to the ARB during interviews. The ARB did not maintain
official transcripts of the testimony provided to the Board. Instead, it developed reports of each
interview based on the notes of staff and Board members. Mullen testified:

Q.   How were the interviews recorded? Was there a court reporter?
Was there video? Was there audio recording? Note taking?

A.  Note taking.

Q.  And none of the other options?
A.  No.

Q.  And how did it get put together?

A.  The staff would put a summary of the interview together. We
would — the members would be able to review that summary
shortly after the interview.

Q.  Any concerns with that?

A.  No.

Q.  That it wasn’t transcribed or recorded?

A.  No. From the standpoint of content, substance and content, I found
them to be very accurate.

Anyways, here’s a list of some of my previous posts on Benghazi. but hey, what difference at this point does it make?

Stay tuned – April 7, 2014

Short Libya Update – March 8, 2014

A Map – February 14, 2014

Another Benghazi Report – February 11, 2014

Benghazi ARB Report: Bird Cage Liner or Probing Investigation? – September 22, 2013

Benghazi: the Obama hens prepare to cluck, cluck, cluck – September 9, 2013

Mark Helprin’s Excellent Article On Obama’s Foreign Policy – April 10, 2013

KT McFarland Analyzes Benghazi Report – December 21, 2013

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, The Media

A worm saves the BLM from further scrutiny

A busy week in the real world kept me from this virtual one.  A year ago I posted a piece, “Janet’s Ammo Stockpile”, questioning the executive branch massive weapons and ammo acquisitions for numerous federal agencies.  I linked to a Forbes piece from 3/11/13,  “1.6 billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security?  It’s Time For A National Conversation”   Yes, whenever you raise the question of federal government run amok, the political Left chimes in with the “tinfoil hat” accusation, relegating your concerns to those of a kooky, conspiracy-nut, best laughed at and shooed away.  Of course, the Left would prefer all this shooing away to include confiscation of legal, privately owned firearms from said conspiracy-nuts. 

I’m just an ordinary working American taxpayer.  I spent most of my adult life as a homemaker, while my husband served in the US Army and then I found an ordinary job when he retired from the military.  We moved a lot with the Army and I enjoy observing people.  Likewise, I watch the news, in print, on TV and now online videos, in addition to listening to and reading the news reporting.  Often the pictures don’t fit the audio and print reporting.  Here’s a link to a piece on the Blaze about the Bureau of Land Management in this ranch stand-off story.  Look at the photo with the caption, “Armed agents for the Bureau of Land Management outside the Cliven Bundy Ranch in Nevada.”  On another site, you can find pictured a photo of a BLM agent, identified as a special forces soldier.  A blog, SOFREP,  (which I have followed for quite a while and enjoy), wrote a lengthy rebuttal of sorts on the photo and recording of said special forces solider, albeit, the SOFREP author is still trying to reach ground truth on the matter.

Here are a few common sense things I know (take that with a pillar of salt, lol) about the military and soldiers whose careers were in actual combat arms.  When combat arms types leave the Army, they face a harsh reality, unless they spent a lot of time preparing for this eventuality.  Most don’t fit in well with the corporate America mentality and their skill sets aren’t compatible with most civilian job offerings.  Police forces often would rather train some fresh recruits without ingrained military habits.  Private contractors for security adventures overseas hire many of these types of former soldiers and it wouldn’t surprise me that federal agencies building the “Obama Civilian National Security Force” would hire former soldiers.

The Annenberg Public Policy Center, presents FactCheck.org on the matter and this link pops up as the first Google link for a Obama Civilian National Security Force” search.  Don’t dig deeper, they’ve got it answered:

Q: Is Obama planning a Gestapo-like “civilian national security force”?

A: This false claim is a badly distorted version of Obama’s call for doubling the Peace Corps, creating volunteer networks and increasing the size of the Foreign Service.

FactCheck goes on to expand  that President Obama was being grossly misquoted and taken out of context on the matter.  Okay, but then how to explain regulatory agencies, not the military or law-enforcement, building paramilitary forces, stockpiling weapons and ammo, and even acquiring military-type vehicles?

Luckily for the mainstream media, the old rancher, Mr. Bundy, provided the perfect opportunity to avoid questioning what this BLM armed force is, how many comprise their force, what it’s purpose is, how much firepower does it stockpile, and exactly what in the hell it’s mission, legislative parameters are and who trains, commands and funds it.  We won’t find that out, because now, alas, Mr. Bundy, aside from being on the wrong side regarding his legal knowledge, also possesses some unsavory racial opinions too.  Thus the media focus can happily pivot from that unhappy line of inquiry and place the full force of its attention on rabid, right-wing racists, assuredly,  a much more comfortable area for their investigative vigor.

So, with Mr. Bundy, turning out to be a worm in one bad apple, whom even Glenn Beck wants to avoid being associated with, the press happily can avoid the BLM armed force questions.  Yes,  it’s back to being happy Obama propagandists again for them.  Much easier to focus on the worm in one apple than get too close to the cesspit that is the Obama administration’s “change you can believe in”.  Once again, who are those armed BLM agents in the pictures from the ranch in NV?   How many armed agents does the BLM have, who funds, trains, commands them?  And if you’re really daring, how about disclosing information about the armed forces in other “regulatory” federal agencies and for the most intrepid, tell us about the Department of Homeland Security’s massive arsenal and just who it is they’re arming and training to fight.  Yes, FactCheck, bravo for your pat answer:

“Here is the relevant portion of what Obama actually said, with the sentences quoted selectively by Broun and others in bold.

Obama, July 2, Colorado Springs, CO: [As] president I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots [from 75,000] and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals, like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their effort connected to a common purpose.

People of all ages, stations and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer. So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an energy corps, to conduct renewable energy and environmental clean-up projects in their neighborhoods all across the country.

We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, and to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.

We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. We need to use technology to connect people to service. We’ll expand USA Freedom Corps to create online networks where American can browse opportunities to volunteer. You’ll be able to search by category, time commitment and skill sets. You’ll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities.

This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda and make their own change from the bottom up.

Does that sound like a force that could kick down your door in the middle of the night and haul you off to a Gulag or concentration camp? You decide.”

– Brooks Jackson

You’re exactly right FactCheck, it doesn’t sound like a force that could kick down your door in the middle of the night, but from my observation, it sure looks like it could…  Yes, absolutely, you decide.

PS:  If you get really curious about the BLM,  Victor Keith posted a piece at the American Thinker, “One of the Biggest Fat Cats in America is the BLM”:

“The BLM controls some 40 percent of the national coal supply and collects more than 1 billion dollars a year in bonus and royalty revenues.  In 2012 alone, they collected a record 2.4 billion dollars.  There is great incentive for the federal government to put as many private coal producers as possible out of business.  It also shows why cattle ranchers are being inexorably driven off their lands by governmental policies.  The federal government has a much more lucrative plan for those lands that does not involve private property owners.”

2 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, Gun Control, Military, The Constitution, The Media

News slop

Some analysts’ personal insights and advice prove more valuable than the story they’re analyzing.  John McCreary’s Nightwatch dissects foreign events using open source material and his analysis often seems more prescient than any of the big name reporters.  In the April 15, 2014  Nightwatch edition there’s a warning to analysts that should be posted in every newsroom:

Warning to analysts: The Web has many images of military equipment and forces. There is no way to tell the authenticity of those images; to identify reliably who the forces are; to determine when the images were taken or to determine which direction the forces are heading. All sides know how to manipulate social media and imagery.”

Imagine how accurate the news reporting could be, if, we had more reporters looking at information dispassionately, critically and then getting off their lazy patooties and running down some facts.  Due to the laziness and lack of critical thinking ability amongst the vast majority of the mainstream press, when pigs fly would be the odds of that happening.  Just keep this Nightwatch warning in the back of your mind, as you consume the slop that’s fed to us as “news”.  We’re the ultimate junk food nation, even in our news feed.

2 Comments

Filed under General Interest, The Media

The hotbed of politics

Finally, I’ve got some time to write a blog post, hooray!  Real life (worked over 56 hours from last Sunday through Thursday) demands kept me away.  Since my time was otherwise occupied, my grasp of the intricacies in the little guy Nevada rancher vs the Big Government situation aren’t as well researched as some of yours, so maybe you can enlighten me.  So, we’ve got this old rancher, Cliven Bundy, who apparently wants his cattle to graze on federal land that Mr. Bundy says belongs to the state of Nevada and therefore he has been battling the federal government since 1993 and losing.  The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) says he owes over a million dollars in grazing fees.  Politico has a good quick breakdown on the various interests and points of view on the situation.  No BLM clash with a private citizen would be complete without some endangered critter, the environmentalists shriek needs “protection”, so in this case it’s some desert tortoise, plus some sheep and even a Lane Mountain milkvetch, whose fragile eco-system needs protection from grazing and other dastardly human activities.  Courtesy of the Sierra Club (story here)  :

“Seven years of impacts, absent monitoring and changes in management, could doom critically endangered species,” said Terry Frewin of the Sierra Club, one of the groups planning to sue. “The BLM’s abdication of legal requirements and Fish and Wildlife Service’s neglect of enforcement is setting up a crisis for these species already teetering on the brink of extinction.”

Groups planning to join the Sierra Club in suing the BLM are the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, and Desert Survivors.

In addition to the desert tortoise, species that have suffered inadequate monitoring and reporting by BLM include the peninsular bighorn sheep and the Lane Mountain milkvetch.”

A Lane Mountain milkvetch……. yes, don’t laugh, but here’s the first paragraph from the Center for Biological Diversity on their battle to protect this plant:

“The Lane Mountain milk vetch is no stranger to adversity, with its remarkable ability to survive for years underground and subsist on what little moisture its taproot can soak up. When this small, desert-dwelling plant does have an aboveground presence, it can be found growing intertwined among the branches of other shrubs for support. The Lane Mountain milk vetch is likewise entangled with the U.S. Army, which is determined to trample this miniature flowering herb and its habitat.”

Yep, they tell you how remarkably resilient this plant is and then ramble on about its need for federal protection of its fragile eco-system…  Moving along, assorted individuals (many of them fellow ranchers, some probably militia kooks too) and groups, who are sick of big government overreach, jumped into the fray to support Mr. Bundy’s stand-off against the feds.  The feds sent some armed folks (not sure who all was involved there) to enforce a court order to remove Bundy’s cattle from federal land.  We heard the feds shot some of the cattle, we heard the endangered tortoises got trampled, we heard Bundy supporters had snipers set up,  we heard the feds had snipers set up.  We even heard Harry Reid’s son has personal business interests in this disputed federal land mess too – he represents a Chinese firm that was planning to build solar panels.  Brietbart debunks this claim and provides a good background to the situation:

“Despite the obvious partisan gain to be had if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s son Rory (a failed 2010 Nevada gubernatorial candidate) had somehow been involved in a “land grab” affecting the Bundy family ranch operation—the facts just do not pan out as such. Indeed, Rory Reid did in fact have a hand in plans to reclassify federal lands for renewable energy developments. Just northeast of Las Vegas and Nellis Air Force Base, plans were drawn by Reid allies to potentially develop 5,717 acres of land for such use. While it would be fair to claim that such activity was in Bundy’s relative neighborhood, the federal lands once leased by the family were more than 20 miles away, east of Overton, Nevada. Contrasting maps offered by InfoWars and those entered into federal court record prove such a theory to be a stretch.”

So, the feds backed down for the moment from enforcing their court order and the Bundy supporters claimed victory.  However, this war isn’t over and Harry Reid set off a new firestorm yesterday, denouncing Bundy and his supporters as “domestic terrorists”.  I watched Sen. Reid ramble on about these “domestic terrorists” whom, he claimed had assault weapons, sniper rifles and even automatic weapons…….. hummm.  I saw pictures of ranchers, women, kids milling about in the TV reporting.  I saw  one photo of one man lying down on a bridge with a rifle – not sure who he even was or what he was aiming at.  Talk about exaggeration then juxtaposed  were the Democrats who remained  strangely mum when the Obama administration labeled the first Fort Hood shooting, just a case of “workplace violence” – no domestic terrorism there.

The real stand-off in this fight over public lands won’t be between small-time cattle rancher and the BLM, no, there’s a bigger war brewing and it going to shape up as a fierce constitutional one over federalism – western states vs. the feds over control of public lands. Here’s an explanation of the  states’ side and stakes, “The New Battle Lands: States Seeking Control of Public Lands in the West”.

This latest clash, of a small time rancher pitted against the almighty federal government strikes a sympathetic chord  with those of us disgusted with federal overreach, even though, the rancher’s legal case has no merits.  He’s making specious claims and his comments that he will obey Nevada state laws and not federal laws hold no water, as far as I can see.  We abide by The Constitution of the United States of America.  However, the underlying discontent among the political Right with big government simmers and our country grows ever more polarized.  On the political Left, the other half of the country demands more government programs, more laws and regulations to control those who disagree with them.  Certainly, the political divide in America grows wider and deeper with the Hope and Change, healer of the political divide in America throwing gasoline (okay maybe ethanol)  on the raging fire of discontent.  Where is the Presidential leadership to calm this crisis?  He’s great at issuing red-line tough talk at the Russians, but he ducked this domestic stand-off.  Certainly, the issue remains  far from over, because the feds can’t just walk away from a court order, yet the President and his Justice Department selectively obey the laws too, so what to make of exactly what “the rule of  law” means in this new America.  President Obama believes he doesn’t need to rely on legislation from Congress, no, he has a pen and a phone:

“And I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward in helping to make sure our kids are getting the best education possible, making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help they need to grow and advance, to make sure that people are getting the skills that they need to get those jobs that our businesses are creating.”

Stay calm, don’t panic, the President is overstepping his constitutional powers for you and our kids, yes, everything he does has pure, altruistic motives…  No worries….

Perhaps, George Will sees what’s just beyond the horizon, much broader and deeper than this public lands debate, when during a recent interview with the Blaze  on his new book he stated:

I’m quite confident that we’re going to rebel against this abusive government. I think that, you know Winston Churchill said, “The American people invariably do the right thing after they have exhausted all the alternatives.”

Let’s hope that when the storm breaks, America survives the maelstrom and we don’t all drown in the process.  Keep your life vest handy, you’ll likely need it…  And if you live in cow country, there’s a reason for the phrase “hotbed of politics”, courtesy of the Online Etymology Dictionary:

hotbed (n.)Look up hotbed at Dictionary.com1620s, from hot + bed (n.); originally “bed of earth heated by fermenting manure for forcing growing plants;” generalized sense of “place that fosters rapid growth” is from 1768.

Yep, a big pile of crap…

 

3 Comments

Filed under General Interest, Gun Control, Politics, The Constitution, The Media, Uncategorized

Female-empowerment comparison shopping

Oh, this endlessly fascinating group of leftists in the Obama White House constantly seeks media attention and cosseting.  The White House press secretary, Jay Carney and his wife, Claire Shipman, ABC news contributor, exemplify the successful, well-connected Washington power couple.  To go with their idyllic life are two cute kids, a family dog (cousin to First Dog, Sunny) and of course, the  picture-perfect DC home.  The Washingtonian interviewed this DC power couple to promote Shipman’s latest female-empowerment tome, The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance—What Women Should Know, written with co-author, Kathy Kay. This latest literary offering follows the much-discussed Sheryl Sandberg’s, Lean In,  Shipman’s previous guide for working women, Womenomics: Write Your Rules for Success and first female press secretary, Dee Dee Myers’ earlier feminist-offering, Why Women Should Rule the World.  What could be better than more expert advice for women on gaining “self-confidence”….

When choosing books, or vacuum cleaners for that matter, I love internet comparison shopping and customer reviews help me make my purchasing decisions, in an informal sort of oh there are 20 reviews and 18 of them say this book wasted perfectly good trees and two (probably written by the author and his/her mom) say the book deserves a Pulitzer Prize for literature. Oh, here’s a helpful amazon.com customer review for Myers’ offering,  “Why women should rule the world” is a book where men get made fun at, poked, insulted, challenged and disrespected.”    Sandberg’s book offers mostly very positive reviews, but here’s a one-star review that made me laugh, “Don’t hold yourself back; don’t be your own worst enemy. I’m pretty sure I was given a fridge magnet with that exact message on it once. Or maybe it was a coaster.)”  Shipman and Kay’s previous book, Womenomics,  received this helpful comment from a female customer , “Here’s the big mystery solved: if you have kids, your career won’t/can’t be first. Wow. Really?”.  Informed shopping wouldn’t be complete without them, so I read the professional reviews too.  The sisterhood  rises to embrace each girl-power addition though, so here’s Shipman’s fellow ABC reporter/morning talk show personality, Diane Sawyer, “A personal, provocative and challenging book for career women who want less guilt, more life.”   See, I told you these customer reviews help make buying decisions, although vacuum cleaner reviews get right to the point, “High suction, low air flow.”

The Washingtonian turned out all the stops to create a glowing puff piece on the Carney/Shipman home life, replete with glossy, staged photo spread.  We get to see this power couple at home with their two photogenic children and the family pooch, who is a cousin to First Dog, Sunny. How warm and cozy, the pajama-clad Mom and kids in a playful kitchen shot, with a counter laden with perfect breakfast food (enough to feed the entire camera crew, plus some), all artfully arranged.   As American as apple pie, oh, wait, the kitchen wall decor, so thoroughly edgy – it’s framed Soviet propaganda posters (The Week story about the story).

Oh hush libertybelle, your kitchen decor remains outdated country-style with an eclectic splash here and there.  The chickens came home to roost , with my cute curtains with a blue chicken-print ruffle and the cute wooden chicken plaque (gift from one of the kids)  that says “Welcome to My Roost Nest” (oops, I remembered it incorrectly).   Hanging on the cup pegs of my hutch, I hung assorted knick-knacky stuff, like right behind my chair at the table is my welcome plaque, an after-Halloween find that I just love:  “Welcome the Witch Is In”.   Even my house has Soviet propaganda posters, a 30 pack of “Wings Of The Motherland” that my one son brought back from his study abroad to Russia long  ago as a gift for my other son.  My other son treasured these propaganda posters so much, that the entire pack is still sitting here in my computer room, gathering dust and he moved out many moons (years) ago. Luckily, I got a very beautiful teapot and a Russian cookbook from that trip.   Of course, my other son (being libertybelle’s offspring) is more concerned with his guns and as he likes to remind us constantly – he is a single issue voter, guess, yep, a 2nd Amendment one, so I suppose these posters will remain here…..  unless I regift them to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue…or maybe the Carney/Shipman home would like to add to their collection….

9 Comments

Filed under General Interest, Politics, The Media

Stay tuned

Pressed for time this morning, so I am keeping this to a short comment and two links.   This is back to President Obama and his red lines and certainty about the source of the alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syria.  You remember, the president definitively pinned a chemical attack last year on the Assad regime, which he used as his justification for US military intervention in Syria.  He changed his mind on the attack at the 11th hour .  Not only was the Syrian resistance mouthpiece, Elizabeth O’Bagy a fraud, but the President’s definitive intelligence on the sarin was bogus too, according to this Seymour Hersh report.  Holy cow, Hersh lays out the Turkish rat line of funneling weapons from Libya to Syria using combined US, Turkish, British and a few other countries’ help.  This report should wake-up the mainstream press in America and maybe we’ll finally get them to pressure this White House to fess up on Benghazi. Here are the links:

First is the August 8, 2013 Nightwatch, the highly-respected open source intelligence report by John McCreary.  Pay attention to the comments on the Syria chemical weapons attack (link here).

Next is the April 6, 2014 Seymour Hersh dynamite piece: “The Red Line and the Rat Line, Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels”. Everything you wanted to know about Benghazi, prior to the attack on that US compound, is in this report.  Mr. Hersh’s report should blow some holes in the White House’s stonewall effort.  Stay tuned.

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, The Media

What the hell does that really mean?

The punditry experts shrilled on today about the latest Fort Hood shooting.  Having decades of experience with soldiers, naturally, I too shrilled on, but luckily for y’all, I confined mine to an email to a friend.  Okay, so the PTSD diagnosis seems to loom large in many of the conversations and yes, I believe PTSD exists, in that many people face difficulties coping with traumatic events and sometimes these difficulties become long-term, incapacitating and professional help might help.   Being highly skeptical of much that passes for medical certainty amongst the mental health community, lets just say, perhaps building a strong personal support network of family, friends, clergy to turn to in times of trouble might be just as good….. maybe even better.

Alas, we live in a world where we to turn to professionals and experts for everything.  I’ll refer back to a G. Murphy Donovan article, The Psychobabble Bubble :

“Psychiatry and psychology are omniscient when it comes to diagnosis, but incapable of professional restraint or anticipating the unintended consequences of indulgence and quackery. Psych practitioners often plead for equality with other medical specialties and then do their damnedest to court ridicule. Credibility is earned, not assumed, in any discipline. Good intentions are a weak tea.”

From there, it’s time to  follow GMD’s link to one of his favorite writers, Theodore Dalrymple and his article, Everyone on the Couch.  Mr Dalrymple states:

“The word “unhappy” is an implicit call to self-examination; the word “depressed” is, at least nowadays, a call to the doctor. It is no coincidence that the age of the DSM should coincide with a tenth of the population’s taking antidepressants—drugs that, for the most part, are placebos when not outright harmful. None of this excludes the possibility, of course, that some diagnoses will run afoul of pressure-group politics by the time the DSM-6 comes out.”

Here’s a review from last year in The Economist on the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition), By the book worth reading, which states:

“Grief. Indulgence. Unhealthy habits. All, it seems, may be classified as mental derangement, and treated as such. And the sets of symptoms described by the DSM are often common. More than one American child in ten has been diagnosed, using the DSM’s definition, with ADHD—and about two-thirds of those so diagnosed are now prescribed drugs.”

I’m not going to dismiss PTSD, because I do believe traumatic events can incapacitate people or cause obstacles to leading a happy, productive life.  Most assuredly some traumas for some people are harder to cope with.  I’ve had a few that were challenging   in my life, so I am not suggesting people avoid seeking professional help, if they feel that is in their best interests.  Unlike the experts, I believe in thinking for myself and I follow my own battle plan for dealing with trauma – back up and regroup, then fight on.  It’s really the only way to take that hill or move mountains.  In the words of a dear friend of mine, a devout Roman Catholic, “God does not give us more crosses than we can bear!”  That is how I choose to live my life, free of antidepressants, alcohol – fighting on.  I don’t believe in insurmountable obstacles.  I cry, I whine, then I drive on.  Life is measured and I want to treasure as much of mine as possible.  Take that as my inexpert opinion.

Sometimes official statements stick with me and I’ll think about them for days, weeks, sometimes even years later, I’ll remember them and ponder, “what the hell does that even really mean?” or I’ll have a witch moment and channel that expert on all things, HRC, and think, “what difference, at this point, does it make”.  In the end, the shooter in this mass murder (not tragedy) is dead, that’s a fact.  Here’s another fact, military officials rushed to assure us that the shooter had psychiatric problems and had been seeing an Army psychiatrist.  Anyone who took solace from that answer needs his/her head examined is what I was thinking today.  Let me ponder that, a Fort Hood psychiatrist, of the same pond from whence MAJ Nidal Hasan swam, the self-same pond that ignored his radicalized views, yes that assurance from officialdom was uttered yesterday.  And, what was MAJ Hasan’s job, this radical nut who waged jihad against American soldiers on American soil?  Oh, yes, he was a psychiatrist who treated soldiers for PTSD and other mental health issues….  Yes, don’t’ think, just accept that this latest shooter had been seen by “mental health professionals”, all the appropriate career-saving dots have been checked in this chain of command.  Rest easy, don’t question, The shooter’s dead, we will never know what he was thinking, no career-ending negligence in sight, the news cycle will move on faster than the grieving families can bury their dead and after all, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”  The shooter had mental health issues and was being seen by an Army psychiatrist at Fort Hood….

 

11 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, Military, Politics, The Media

A picture paints a thousand words….

Repeatedly I’ve argued against escalating the crisis in Ukraine, but the West should act.  The United States should work within the framework of NATO to beef up both NATO’s training and weapons systems.  Revisiting discussions on NATO’s most vulnerable eastern countries defense against Russian aggression, to include the scrapped missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic, should have already been high-profile.  President Obama taking a military option off the table from the start gave Putin a clear message that the West won’t act, setting a dangerous precedent and weakness is more provocative than a show of strength.  A show of strength gives adversaries some second thoughts on using more force, because they know there might be a high cost to further action.  Here are some ideas worth considering, in this USA Today piece, “Ukraine’s military unprepared to hurt Russia”.  They say a picture paints a thousand words and  if the best this administration’s collective brain trust  can muster  is Jen Psaki holding a placard announcing US “support” of Ukraine…… a lame selfie worthy of a 12 year-old on facebook, then we’re in deep, deep trouble!  The world is laughing at us, not with us.

It’s time to get serious and put some real options into play.  Now is not the time for sweeping cuts to our military, with both China and Russia asserting themselves beyond their borders and so many smaller countries falling into disarray.  Iran going nuclear will fuel an entirely more dangerous nuclear weapons proliferation rush, as other Arab states decide that acquiring nuclear capability is in their national defense interests now.  President Obama facilitated Iran going nuclear.  Instability looks to be the trend for the foreseeable future and we’re stuck with this inept clown leading us from behind until 2016, which is a long, long time.

The United States, as I’ve said before, needs to get serious about breaking free of our domestic malaise.  Please, President Obama, let the force of the American entrepreneurial engine roar back to life!  Remove the heavy foot of government from the US energy sector and let it breath again.  Sign the Keystone pipeline deal.  And frack, frack, frack!

19 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, The Media