Category Archives: General Interest

All politics is local

This is a must read!  Stella Morabito wrote an important piece in The Federalist:

Ask Not Who’s Running For President, Ask Who’s Running For School Board

Morabito explains:

There will be local elections throughout the nation next week. Please, folks, pay attention and vote, because these elections are about the very survival of local self-governance. They are at least as consequential as anything on the national stage, and probably more so.

Consider the following. When the school board of Fairfax County, Virginia, was set to vote on promoting the ideology of transgenderism in the schools last May, parents and citizens showed up in droves. They loudly protested the predictable outcomes of the move, which masqueraded as an anti-discrimination policy.

Such outcomes include abolishing children’s privacy in bathrooms and locker rooms and abolishing girls’ sports, which would be open to any male who claims to perceive himself as female. So the Fairfax County Public School (FCPS) policy also violates both the letter and spirit of Title IX. It also serves to divide and conquer families because it requires all students to openly reject anything they learned from their parents about human sexuality and human dignity that school bureaucrats deem in conflict with the policy.

The Fairfax school board imposed a transgender policy, by sleight of hand maneuvering, using local political cronies. Morabito continues:

It was a total ambush. The board voted 10-1 with one abstention to shove the policy down the throats of startled parents. There was no discussion and no consideration given to the concerns expressed. Instead, the parents were in effect smeared as intolerant bigots.

The ten board members voting in compliance with this federal harassment behaved like a bunch of cronies who seemed most interested in securing their places of privilege in a coming nomenklatura by regurgitating Orwellian-style talking points about “equality” and “non-discrimination.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture Wars, Education, General Interest, Politics

Another lie?

Hillary keeps repeating the mantra that she never sent nor received classified information that was marked classified. Reading through the comments on Andrew McCarthy’s piece, mentioned in my previous post, a comment caught my attention. Of course, in this case Hillary sent a personal email, containing information that one would think was automatically classified – marked or not and the recipient does not have a security clearance. Here’s the comment and please fill me in where this reasoning is incorrect:

Douglas • a day ago

A question no one addressed at the hearing or in the aftermath. The fact that the immediate reports out of Libya that the Mission had been attacked by jihadis must have been classified communications.

Yet, Hillary immediately shared that info with her daughter who has no security clearance whatsoever and is, or was, an employee of NBC News.

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, Terrorism

Another cry from the wilderness

Wrote another comment on National Review this morning, “Hillary’s Breathtaking Mendacity” – just another cry from the wilderness:

susanholly Saturday, October 24, 2015 9:45 AM

This will sound like a conspiracy theory and it is, but Hillary getting through this hearing sets her on course to win in 2016. The Clintons are masters of obstructing justice, obfuscation and mass media manipulation (propaganda). The Clintons don’t leave things to chance and personally, I believe Bill Clinton, a bona fide political genius, has masterminded and implemented one of the most brilliant political strategies this time around. I’ll call my theory “Scorched Earth 2016”. That email server revelation threw them off course a bit in March, but they’ve weathered that.

Bill Clinton’s winning strategy is triangulation, it’s how he won the White House. As Sanders took off in the polls, that gave the Clintons their far-left kook, but they needed one on the right – enter Trump. Now, imagine Bill Clinton hears rumors that Trump is thinking of entering the race and Clinton knows Trump, heck they’ve golfed together many times at Trump’s course, Trump National Golf Club ( http://www.unz.com/isteve/why-… ) and he even attended Trump’s wedding. So, being the political genius, Bill Clinton comes up with a plan. He calls Trump and chats with him and in a friendly tone he tells Trump he’ll need to hire some political consultants, but the best ones are Carville and Begala. Trump thinks of hiring political consulting help as just business. Imagine Trump decides if he enters this race, he wants the best. Imagine if he talks to them, but they tell him they are radioactive among the GOP, so their work for him would have to be kept top secret. The entire set-up could have been done in the guise of “friendly business advice” by Bill Clinton and Trump would not ever suspect it.

Trump starts campaigning where every other word is about his poll numbers and how popular he is – this is vintage Carville/Begala – it creates mass delusion – people believe he is winning and therefore more people begin to take his candidacy seriously. Trump needs some campaign issues and the very first one he picks, with their advice, is illegal immigration, which resonates with the GOP base (along with the racist, xenophobe and bigot bottom-feeders of the party – who jump on board). That alienates Hispanic voters a vital part of the electorate the GOP needs in the general. Next the Megyn Kelly flap – there goes a large segment of women (another vital part of the electorate to the GOP and he compounded the damage with his comments on Fiorina’s looks). Along with this, Trump monopolizes the race with his attacks, antics and keeps the media transfixed on him, making it almost impossible for other GOP candidates to gain traction – this is a Carville/Begala media tactic trademark – it’s how they got Bill Clinton through impeachment. I liken this tactic to the military tactic of swarming – none of the others can break through, because he keeps the race in disarray.

There was a photo a while back of Bill Clinton and Obama golfing on vacation at Martha’s Vineyard ( http://abcnews.go.com/Politics… ). Look at Bill Clinton’s facial expression. I believe that conversation was about burying the email server, but Obama held out. Biden’s Rose Garden speech the other day was Obama surrendering to the Clintons and this hearing was just the last hurdle. Bill Clinton has his triangulation set-up – Sanders the kook on the left, Trump the kook on the right and Hillary prances down the middle to the White House. Notice how confident she is – she knows his strategy is working and she knows there will be no prosecution over her email scandal.

Of course, this is just my theory and I am just a homemaker who wrote about the Clintons on the Excite message boards in 1998, under the user name “mhere”. I know how far that political machine will go to silence people – it happened to me. Of course, I ended up locked up in a mental facility for 18 days and was almost locked up in a state mental hospital – permanently back then – so, no one will ever take me seriously and no one will listen to me. What happened to me is something you’d expect in a communist country, not America, and that is why I am writing this and why I write my blog. I wrote about what happened in a light-hearted fashion – but it’s the truth and every character is a real person. I offered to give the real names to several journalists over a year ago and none of them ever responded. You can file this comment under Forlorn Hope, because I know justice does not exist in America – http://libertybellediaries.com…

2 Comments

Filed under General Interest, Politics

My bitter morning after pill

So many Republicans went to bed believing Hillary had to be thoroughly discredited after yesterday, but I believe their optimism is sadly misplaced. Here’s my bitter morning after pill, in comments, at the American Thinker already: “Ambassador Stevens is Dead, Hillary is Alive, and the Truth is on the Run” By Patricia McCarthy

susanholly  Friday, October 23, 2015 8:20 AM

She sailed through that hearing and the Dems on the committee never wavered from their talking points: “this hearing is a right-wing witch hunt” and “this is costing the American taxpayers $4.7 million.” A few of those Dems, to include Congressman Cummings, groveled so shamelessly, that’s it’s obvious they wanted to secure enough Clinton brownie points to merit consideration for cabinet posts in her administration

She knows the Obama Justice Dept. is not going to indict her. Bill Clinton must have done some really nasty backroom brawling to get Biden to come out and make that Rose Garden speech – Obama has surrendered to the Clintons. With Biden dropping out and the GOP field kept in constant disarray by Trump, sadly, the path is clear for Hillary.

Expect the Dems and their aiders and abettors in the press to talk about the wondrous Thomas Pickering and this ARB committee (Accountability Review Board) for several days to help bury this Benghazi hearing. That committee did not keep any written or videotaped record of any of its work – there are no transcripts or video of witnesses that appeared before this committee and as you heard yesterday one member (retired Admiral Mike Mullen) tried to tamper with having a witness testify to Congress .  That witness was Charlene Lamb – the assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, who denied a request from the top diplomatic security officer in Libya to retain a 16-man military team for diplomat security – ( http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/comment-page-1/ ). – that’s your fair and impartial ARB Hillary and the Dems mentioned over and over and over. It is also Mullen who described that the ARB committee kept no record of its proceedings – just went off of personal notes to produce its report (pages 21-22): http://oversight.house.gov/wp-…

I can’t prove this, but after watching the Trump campaign for months, I believe he is following the Carville/Begala media plan, identical to how the Clinton spin machine saved Bill Clinton throughout impeachment – the endless repetition of his poll numbers and the slash and burn of opponents in an endless barrage in the media, where the opposition stays blocked out. Trump immediately alienated Hispanics and next women – two key demographics for the GOP in the general election. It reminds me of the military tactic of swarming. Now, we know Bill Clinton called Donald Trump weeks before Trump entered the race ( https://www.washingtonpost.com… )- did he recommend campaign consultants – like Carville and Begala?

The email server scandal threw Hillary off-base, but by her performance yesterday you can tell she’s confident and glided in like she is the Queen. This entire race is looking to me like the Clintons decided they weren’t taking any chances this time and launched a scorched earth strategy – Trump will keep the GOP race in disarray and if he is the nominee – Bill Clinton’s triangulation is masterfully set up – Bernie the kook on the left, Trump the kook on the right and the Queen prances up the middle to the Presidency.

15 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

Ambassador Stevens met with Al Qaeda affiliate

Here is the Congressman Pompeo line of inquiry – Ambassador Stevens met with an Al Qaeda affiliate hours before the attack.

“Clinton: ‘I Know Nothing’ About Ambassador Stevens’s Meeting with Al-Qaeda Affiliate”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425935/hillary-clinton-benghazi-testimony-chris-stevens

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism

A LB Retrospective of Hillary’s ARB Report

The following is a rerun of a LB blog post from September 22, 2013, so when you consider this information, just ask yourself the question posed in the title:

Benghazi ARB report: Bird Cage Liner or Probing Investigation?

Gladius emailed this handy link to the House’s Committee on Oversight and  Government Reform interim report on the Benghazi Attacks released September 16, 2013.  (full report here).   I’ve only waded through the first couple dozen pages and each page leads to more questions on Madame Secretary’s legally mandated internal review of the events surrounding Benghazi.  Her State Department set-up an Accountability Review Board (ARB), run by five big name former government servants, to include former ambassador to the UN and six other countries, Thomas Pickering and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, retired Admiral Mike Mullen.  The Obama administration cited this ongoing investigation as a shield from probing questions by the media and concerned Congressional members and as a handy sword to swiftly fell any who dared criticize.  Pages 21-22  explains their process for gleaning the facts, with Admiral Mike Mullen testifying how their ARB report was put together:

In addition, the Committee has been unable to assess with any specificity what
information witnesses conveyed to the ARB during interviews. The ARB did not maintain
official transcripts of the testimony provided to the Board. Instead, it developed reports of each
interview based on the notes of staff and Board members. Mullen testified:

Q.   How were the interviews recorded? Was there a court reporter?
Was there video? Was there audio recording? Note taking?

A.  Note taking.

Q.  And none of the other options?
A.  No.

Q.  And how did it get put together?

A.  The staff would put a summary of the interview together. We
would — the members would be able to review that summary
shortly after the interview.

Q.  Any concerns with that?

A.  No.

Q.  That it wasn’t transcribed or recorded?

A.  No. From the standpoint of content, substance and content, I found
them to be very accurate.

Yep, they relied on their own personal notes rather than on recording, videotaping or even having a stenographer present.  This was how their official report was documented.  I’ll read the entire report before rendering a final judgement on Madame Secretary’s ARB report and relegating it to the bird cage liner pile (worthy only of catching droppings), but the first couple dozen pages are damning.

5 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism

The Queen’s re-re-re launch TODAY

Her opening statement serves as her campaign foreign policy speech. The Clinton scorched earth moves on. As you should note the Clinton camp colluded with Congressman Cummings.

She is listing her credentials and playing the victim of a witch hunt. She is using  her Queen persona today, above the dirty gutter politics.

She will use tearing up and righteous indignation all day…  Barf!

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, Terrorism

A triangulation theory?

Do you ever let your mind wander and think about “what ifs”?  Well, as Donald Trump continues to keep the GOP race in disarray and feeds the worst bigots, xenophobes and racists at the base, well, I wonder, would the Clinton political machine be able to orchestrate a more perfect triangulation than to have far-left kook, Bernie Sanders on the left and Donald Trump on the right.  Trump’s single-handedly throwing the election to Hillary with his “deport them all”, which threw the Hispanic vote in the toilet for the GOP, if he is the candidate, then it was the attacks on women, or how about his “closing mosques” comment yesterday?  That would leave the Queen sitting snugly in the “middle” – calm, grandmotherly and looking “moderate”…

At first, I thought this would be impossible, but as I’ve watched Trump continue to agitate and throw out these verbal hand grenades at any in the GOP field, who looks like he/she might move up in the polls, then add in all these outrageous lines he keeps throwing out to alienate wide swaths of the electorate, it all seems orchestrated and contrived.  A couple days ago he was blaming GWB for 9/11 and not keeping America safe, yet it was President Clinton who let bin Laden go and who did nothing to deal with Al Qaeda’s attacks on American interests – USS Cole, Khobar Towers, Mogadishu ring any bells.  No, Trump attacked GWB…

I began to think Trump’s operating like a Clinton sewer rat and he sure fixates on the polls – just like the Clintons.  Every other word he speaks is about his poll numbers and the press feeds on that too.  This training the American public that polls determine what’s right and wrong, not the merits of the issue, worked like a charm during the Clinton impeachment.  “Who cares if a President lies under oath – the American public doesn’t;  just look at the President’s poll numbers”, went the argument.  The media sold that line of reasoning and the American people bought it.

We know Trump frequently golfed with Bill Clinton, praised Hillary and even invited the Clintons to his wedding.  In fact, that reported phone call from Bill Clinton to Trump right before he announced his decision to enter the race as a Republican seems so odd, looking back at how this race is stacking up.  Trump is clearing the path for a Hillary win.

So, does Trump have some vendetta against GWB or the Bushes, because his ultimate target is to demolish Jeb Bush?  Trump holds grudges and he believes in destroying his enemies.  Back in August 2015, I wrote a post where I quoted one of Trump’s books:

Last week I bought one of Trump’s books, as I mentioned before, and I read it.  Assuredly, Trump offered many interesting insights into, as the book’s title stated, “TRUMP: How to Get Rich”.  The pride he takes in his children comes across and he offers some worthwhile advice on investing and negotiating, but trying to get to the character of who exactly is Donald Trump, well, he’s a man who has chapters in his book like “Be Strategically Dramatic”, “Sometimes You Still Have To Screw Them”, and “Sometimes You Have To Hold a Grudge”, replete with examples from his life and his guiding principles. Here are some quotes (page 138):

“When somebody hurts you, just go after them as viciously and as violently as you can.  Like it says in the Bible, an eye for an eye.”

Be paranoid.  I know this observation doesn’t make any of us sound very good, but let’s face the fact that it’s possible that even your best friend wants to steal your spouse and your money.”

The chapter on holding a grudge is even more interesting, because Trump relates how for years he had donated huge amounts of money to NY governor, Mario Cuomo and when he called Cuomo to ask for a favor from Cuomo’s son, Andrew, who was running the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  Mario Cuomo refused to do the favor (which Trump doesn’t explain in detail other than to say it was an appropriate favor involving attention to a detail). Trump blew up and for any who are confused with Trump’s vendetta against Megyn Kelly on Twitter, calling her a bimbo last night or his refusing to entertain a question by Jorge Ramos from Univision this evening, well, this chapter on holding a grudge (page 142) explains it.  Trump called in a political favor believing it was owed to him, because he donated a lot of money to Mario Cuomo  (crony capitalism is what most people call this greasing of palms).  Here is how Trump describes the phone call:

“I did the only thing that felt right to me.  I began screaming.  “You son of a bitch!  For years I’ve helped you and never asked for a thing, and when I finally need something, and a totally proper thing at that, you aren’t there for me.  You’re no good.  You’re one of the most disloyal people I’ve known and as far as I’m concerned, you can go to hell.”

My screaming was so loud that two or three people came in from adjoining offices and asked who I was screaming at.  I told them it was Mario Cuomo., a total stiff, a lousy governor, and a disloyal former friend.  Now whenever I see Mario at dinner, I refuse to acknowledge him, talk to him, or even look at him.”

Today, Vice President, Joe Biden, decided not to run, so the field is cleared for Hillary and I believe Bill Clinton is throwing his political muscle around to secure the nomination for Hillary.  After all, she went to great lengths to save his presidency during all their assorted scandals, but especially during the Lewinsky scandal.  Coincidences do happen, but some are just too strange, like Bill Clinton calling Donald Trump weeks before Trump’s decision to run as a Republican for president.

Perhaps, this all falls in the realm of a wild conspiracy theory, but it’s best to look at how many segments of the electorate Trump has thrown to the Queen and keep tabs, as he makes more, supposedly, contemporaneous comments that set GOP hopes in flames.  This sure has the stench of a Clintonian scorched earth policy, where they hold all of the matches.

22 Comments

Filed under General Interest, Politics

Safety in the skies over Syria

McClatchy DC reports: “U.S., Russia sign Syria air safety deal but keep quarreling over war aims” written by James Rosen.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article40531689.html#storylink=cpy

Rosen writes:

WASHINGTON – American and Russian senior military officials signed an agreement Tuesday spelling out safety rules their nations’ aircraft are to follow in the contested skies over Syria, but the two governments continued to snipe at each other’s goals in the Middle East country.

Pentagon officials said the accord was a narrow, technical “memorandum of understanding” that in no way signals U.S. approval of the new Russian air campaign to support Syrian President Bashar Assad’s embattled army.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

Another plan

I posted my Syria plan ideas at the Small Wars Journal, under a piece from War on the Rocks, “A New Plan for the United States in Syria“, by Ben Jonsson which starts off with this shift in strategy:

“As the Obama administration rethinks its Syria strategy, it should start by redefining U.S. interests in the face of an increasingly fractured Syrian conflict and adopting a new strategy that seeks to immediately reduce the level of violence by enforcing a pause on offensive operations by all sides in Syria.”

That goal is lofty, but at this point there’s nothing to induce that Syrian/Russian/Iranian alliance nor the assorted Syrian rebel groups to agree to a ceasefire.  I wrote my plan in the comments, it’s a repeat, so just skip it if you’ve been reading my posts the last couple weeks:

libertybelle October 20, 2015 – 12:08pm

The US calling for a ceasefire will fall on deaf ears at this point. I believe we should be formulating a plan to attack ISIS from the east, as the Syrian/Russian/Iranian alliance moves eastward from western Syria. We should discuss our plan to roll back ISIS with our allies and the Russian led alliance and while we should not become part of the Russian alliance, we should maintain open dialogue with Putin on our aims. It’s imperative that we talk to Putin, but the US must maintain total control over our plan. We should emphasize the urgency of getting to a ceasefire in Syria quickly with the more “moderate” Syrian rebels and the US should work with Putin to insure that safe zones can quickly be set up, with the aid of the international community, to protect civilians and those who put down their arms. Pouring more arms in to “moderate Syrians” will prolong the carnage.

We must recognize that Assad is a second tier problem compared to ISIS. If a “Russian-friendly” regime is in the wings to replace Assad, then Putin may be willing to let the good folks in Brussels deal with Assad. Syria has been a Russian client-state for decades and we lose nothing if a Russian-friendly government replaces Assad, but we will lose a great deal if ISIS fills a power vacuum should Assad fall first.

If we demonstrate an ability to implement a plan to work with forces in Iraq to really tackle ISIS, many of our traditional allies may prefer to align with the US rather than the Russian/Iranian/Syrian alliance, and this would counter the growing Iranian influence. We might be able to restore American credibility in the process too, which would aid us long-term. This plan would require deft diplomacy, speedy action and a willingness to use adequate military force to a clearly defined mission – defeat the Islamic State.

A pitfall to avoid would be to invest too many American boots on the ground and end up in an occupying mode in Iraq again, which would not help our long-term strategy in the region, which should be promoting REGIONAL STABILITY.

There was a 2014 paper in SSI by General Huba Wass de Czege ( http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Issues/Winter_… ),which had some ideas on how to prevent power vacuums as we progress, by relying on local and tribal leaders to create grassroots law and order as we learn and grow our capacity. We need to utilize new ideas and be open to change, while keeping in mind that as ISIS is rolled back, quickly establishing local security capacity is vital and since the “national government” has demonstrated no ability to do this, in addition to the ethnic divide between the national government and local population in ISIS territory, perhaps working with local leadership might work better. This is just an idea. There was July 2015 SSI paper by Dr. Robert E. Lamb,”Strategic Insights: Fragile States Cannot Be Fixed With State-Building” (http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/index.cfm/articles/Fragile…), which explains this common pitfall with international efforts at “nation-building”.

Expecting a ceasefire, absent any real US plan, especially with the US reputation at a low-ebb, will get us nowhere.

https://libertybellediaries.com/2015/10/08/my-plan-for-the-syria-mess-inc…

I believe this “ceasefire first” plan relies on magical thinking and a lot of glossing over the serious problems with our Bosnia efforts, which this author seemed to be unaware of or ignored. “Moderate Syrian” rebels will not agree to a ceasefire immediately and frankly, the Assad regime, in an existential struggle, likewise, at this point has no incentive to agree to one. It seems to me like a retread of the Bosnia Plan. My idea apparently seems too controversial for consideration – oh no, we can’t talk to Putin, but the only way to have a seat at the table or to counter the Russian/Iranian moves is to be relevant. Expecting the “international community” or in this case, the writer listed regional powers, to tighten the diplomatic screws enough to force compliance to a ceasefire seems unlikely to work, imho.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism