Category Archives: Islam

The Obama/Black Grievance Community/Arab money connection?

Another amazing connection!  I posted a comment on the The Diplomad 2.0 blog yesterday:

There’s a large organizational structure that is funding, coordinating, facilitating these racial flashpoints, which sure looks to me much like the Van Jones STORM manifesto, pages 53-54…. “Moving the Resistance to Revolution”. Of course, this will be dismissed as just a wild conspiracy theory, but there’s a strange connection between radical black nationalists like Shabazz, the Black Guerrilla Network, the Nation of Islam, where we have Islam melded with black nationalism/gangs and then the neat and clean mouthpieces like Van Jones and his friends in the White House. The thugs in the streets are the sideshow, while a new federal regulatory scheme for all law enforcement is being stealthily advanced. It’s all about seizing control of all levers of power.

libertybelle

Reply

2 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Politics

Suggested Reading

Here’s a timely, helpful short primer on your road to strategic-thinking :

“Thucydides Was Right: Defining the Future Threat” by Dr. Colin S. Gray

Another LB post from September 2014:

“Let’s not keep shooting elephants to avoid looking a fool”

Here’s an excellent read (it’s a book available for purchase) on America’s role in the world from the late General William E. Odom, which offers some wise counsel on our present convoluted foreign policy:

“America’s Inadvertent Empire”

Here’s a short thought-provoking piece from Cora Sol Goldstein that appeared in the 2012 Autumn Strategic Studies Institute edition:

“The Afghanistan Experience: Democratization By Force”

What you might ask am I going to read to be prepared – well, I’m going to get back to finishing reading General John J. Pershing’s two-volume, Pulitzer-prize winning,  autobiography on his experiences in World War I – like building a modern fighting force from pretty much the bottom up (might be timely as our military is being dismantled by social engineering from President Obama, feckless leadership at the top, and over a decade of futile missions in the ME):

“My Experiences in the World War”

Of course, Dr. Gray recommends reading Thucydides, so I’ve bookmarked that too:

“The History of the Peloponnesian War”

For a daily rundown and analysis of the world’s hotspots, I recommend John McCreary:

“Nightwatch”

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, History, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism, Useful Links

A real discussion on ISIS

JK sent me a link to a War On The Rocks podcast, that’s worth listening to:

PODCAST: The Islamic State’s War in Iraq and Syria

It’s a round table kind of discussion on the debacle that is Iraq and Syria between a group of experts, who really offer a lot of interesting insights into the factions, politics, religious strife, policy approaches, history and also some opinions on ways forward at untangling this Gordian knot.  It’s a breath of fresh air to hear differing opinions and some discussion that is calm and filled with more than propaganda promoting an agenda.

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, History, Islam, Military, Politics

All in for “moderates”

Here’s a piece, “State Department Wanted to Engage ‘Moderate Jihadists’ in Libya“, by Patrick Poole over at PJMedia worth reading.  It’s from a few days ago – still timely though.  Poole always includes many links to back up his points, so check out those too.  The Obama administration far surpasses the Bush administration on willful ignorance about America’s enemies in the Muslim world, but this determined delusion persists that, “if” only we engage and recruit “moderates” among the rat nests of Islamist zealots, then this will provide the indigenous force multiplier we need to defeat the more violent practitioners of the religion of Peace.  Yep, our “experts” remain as indoctrinated as the enemy…

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism

Cultural relativism run amok

Here’s another ME expert, Hillary Mann Leverett, a former diplomat who served in both the Clinton and Bush administrations, whose views on the Muslim world and problems in the ME may help explain why our foreign policy lacks any coherence or common sense.  This expert, during an MSNBC appearance Monday,  claimed Iran’s theocracy is a political experiment as profound as the United States and even goes on to compare the Ayatollah with a Supreme Court Justice.   Andrew Johnson at National Review quotes Leverett:

”It’s a very interesting system,” she said. “It’s, again, been caricatured in the United States for so long as this kind of crazed Islamist dictatorship when, in fact, it’s a political experiment, I think, as profound as perhaps the American system or the French system, trying to fuse Islamism with participatory politics.” “Ayatollah Khamenei is in a sense like our Supreme Court justice: He has the final say, but he also does that not just in a legal way, but in a political way,” Leverett continued. “Underneath him, there are very much empowered parts of the system, not just a president but parliament, armed forces, just like the way our Pentagon often has a say, both in terms of budget and policy, theirs does too.”

To add insult to injury, this woman is teaching in an American university.  In 2014 she claimed there’s no history of antisemitism in Muslim countries and blames the United States involvement with Israel as the cause of the antisemitism.  Yes, all those “death to Israel” chants and calling Jewish people vile slurs are just misunderstood…

1 Comment

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Politics

A city-by-city Iraqi mirage

This morning JK sent a link to an article written by Craig Whiteside at War On The Rocks, “Mosul: A Bridge Too Far?”.  This article presents an excellent background history of the factions and dispels the mythological sudden appearance of IS/ISIL/ISIS with a very detailed chronology of how radical Islamist elements aligned in the region surrounding Mosul had local support going back much further than last year when ISIL broke into the western media’s consciousness.  Whiteside states:

“The narrative that Mosul was invaded from Syria by a small number of militants last summer who managed to drive out a corrupt security force supports the idea the ISIL has shallow roots in the area and can be pushed out with moderate effort. As I argued here at War on the Rocks last December, that narrative only tells half of a story. Mosul’s fall last year was less telling as an indicator of the collapse of an occupational army than a measure of ISIL’s true and longstanding strength in the area. It was a tipping point and a shift that better explains why thousands fled from mere hundreds of insurgents. ISIL has had a strong presence in Ninewa (Mosul’s province) ever since Fallujah’s clearance in late 2004 left Mosul as the unofficial capital of ISIL.”

Whiteside’s phrasing using “the narrative” descriptive as more magical myth than detailed, fact-based chronology explains much of the problem with our understanding of IS/ISIL/ISIS and the political lay of the land among Iraq’s many tribes and factions.  The city-by-city strategic plan of defeating the Islamic State seems poorly thought out and a very costly endeavor in not only materiel, but also in lives.  Our press does a terrible job at asking questions and the laziness at actually digging for answers leads to these lapses in understanding  not only  foreign affairs, but also domestic affairs too.  We live awash in reports, experts, and intelligence. Yet, it seems our intelligence agencies don’t communicate and they definitely don’t collate the information available, then carefully assess their working theories or analyses to incorporate the new information.  So, we have these Mike Brown gentle giant myths and this ISIL magically appearing type understanding of the situations.

I’m adverse to escalating military intervention in Iraq (or anywhere in the ME) until there is a complete rethinking of our big picture foreign policy objectives in the region, a careful analysis of the situations on the ground in the various countries (especially the collapsing and failed states).  Then, the U.S. should carry out intense, serious diplomatic discussions with the players in that region and beyond, to include sitting down and talking to Putin and the Chinese about the ME chaos.  This pushing to make retaking Iraqi cities, the metric by which  “defeating ISIS” is judged, is totally idiotic!

That massive hyping by politicians and the press on the battle for Kobani set the stage for this myopic strategy.  By the time Kobani was “won”, what the hell did it matter – the “city” was mostly abandoned, demolished and a pile of rubble.  It made me think of that Vietnam era quote: “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.”, Peter Arnett reported as a quote from an unnamed U.S. officer.  Sun Tzu, my favorite military strategy book, mentions both avoiding battles in cities and also avoiding so much destruction:

“1. Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.”

The War On The Rocks article includes informative links worth reading, which explain the strategic issues more clearly.  One link, “Stop Looking For The Center Of Gravity”, by Lawrence Freedman, highlights a serious problem in American military strategic planning, where we look for points to attack (center of gravity) and deliver a blow that will topple the enemy.  What we miss in this way of approaching our strategic planning is the most basic big picture strategy, which Freedman explains:

“So the wrong question to ask at the start of a campaign is “What is the enemy’s center of gravity?” The term should henceforth be banned. What should be put in its place? My suggestion may appear anticlimactic and banal. I would pose a simpler, more straightforward question: “What is the position you wish to reach?””

Fighting the Islamic State in cities, where the civilians are forced to flee, the city is reduced to rubble and the combatants, as in Kobani, are two brutal terrorist entities, while western reporters watch and cheer the Kurdish PKK liberators left me wondering what they were cheering about.  The alarming refugee numbers in Syria, Iraq and in many other Islamist battleground locations add up to failed states and ruined lives.  Too often men get so entrenched in fighting and winning that they lose sight of the bigger picture of “at what cost to the people who live there?”  That is an important question that our leaders need to consider.  Yes, defeating IS/ISIL/ISIS is important, but that band of loons is just one component to this whole big Islamic Ascendency civilizational crisis.  Without a big picture understanding and then a comprehensive strategy to address the larger Islamic civilizational crisis, we are wasting lives, money, and time chasing windmills. 

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism

GMD’s latest pearl of wisdom: “The Faces of Foreign Policy Failure”

Personality is seldom thought to be relevant to national security analysis. Yet in the end, intelligence, policy, and failures are made by men — and the occasional woman. We are fond of blaming history, institutions, processes, or systems for social….

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics

GMD breaks down the Islamic threat (a must read)

Policy is a worldview. Intelligence is the real world, a wilderness of untidy facts that may or may not influence policy. When Intelligence fails to provide a true and defensible estimate, a clear picture of threat, policy becomes a rat’s nest ….

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism

More answers to why jihad

Two articles worth reading on the religion of Peace and violent extremism are at the American Thinker today.  First up, “Please Read the Koran” by Edward Thal offers up a short analysis of what he learned by reading through the Koran twice.  Then, Shoshana Bryen wrote, “NYPD had  it Right a Long Time Ago”,  countering the Marie Harf/John Kerry argument that what jihadis need is more job opportunities and for us to address their greivances.

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Politics, Terrorism

#Nothing-burger Plan

JK posted a must-read link on my last post: “Why the Iraq Offensive Will Fail” by Michael T. Flynn, retired US Army  Lieutenant General/former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.  Flynn clearly articulates the threat and steps to take to defeat the enemy, but first let me quote him from this politico.com article:

“Yet to defeat an enemy, you first must admit they exist, and this we have not done. I believe there continues to be confusion at the highest level of our government about what it is we’re facing, and the American public want clarity as well as moral and intellectual courage, which they are not now getting

 There are some who argue that violent Islamists are not an existential threat and therefore can simply be managed as criminals, or as a local issue in Iraq and Syria. I respectfully and strongly disagree.”
Flynn continues:

“We, as a nation, must accept and face the reality that we and other contributing nations of the world are at war, and not just in Iraq. We are in a global war with a radical and violent form of the Islamic religion, and it is irresponsible and dangerous to deny it. This enemy is far broader than the 40,000 or so fighters in the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. There also exists a large segment of this radical version of Islam in over 90 nations abroad as well as here at home. Just ask those countries from which foreign fighters are flowing into the Levant to support this “jihad.””

The entire Flynn article is a must read, as he lays out steps he feels we must take to defeat. not only the Islamic State, but the broader fight against adherents of a violent and radical form of the Islamic religion.  In the Cold War we battled a virulent communist ideology and in WWII we fought virulent forms of totalitarianism.   Sadly, many, out of religious tolerance ingrained in our American psyche, tiptoe around the threat posed by radical Islam, perhaps better called Islamic Imperialism, where the stated goal is to annihilate all non-Muslim peoples and establish an Islamic Caliphate to rule the world.

Listening to “experts” analyze Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda for over a decade, well, I often thought certain opinions got cherry-picked as the definitive summation, while often, it seemed like many “experts” weren’t even really listening to what Al Qaeda spokesmen and Bin laden were saying in their numerous communiques.  When individuals or groups of individuals repeatedly declare war on your country and fellow countrymen, it’s wise to take them seriously, yet far too many of the “experts” consistently tried to whitewash the religious elements to these declared “holy war” edicts from Al Qaeda.  Likewise, the Obama administration spends more time trying to conjure up straw men (right-wing, domestic sovereign citizen hordes) threats to play cheap partisan one-up-manship games with a threat emanating from a large number of Muslims’ interpretation of Islam.

 Whitwall, a poster at Malcolm Pollack’s blog, offered this very fascinating article, “European Colonialism is the Only Thing That Modernized Islam”, by Daniel Greenfield.  Greenfield offers some thoughts to ponder as the West struggles to understand the “religion of Peace”:
“The problem isn’t that ISIS is ‘medieval’. The problem is that Islam is.

What progressives mistake for modern Islam, whether while touring Algeria or on the campus of their university, is really an Islam whose practice has been repressed by the West while its ideology remains untouched. Modern Islam is in a state of contradiction. It’s a schizophrenic religion whose doctrine calls for supremacism but whose capabilities prevent it from exercising the full measure of its doctrines.

Islam is the 90 lb. weakling that wants to be the school bully. It can’t punch you in the face, so it stabs you in the back and then blames someone else. When you punch it back, it plays the victim.

This split between ideas and power forced Islamists to resort to sneakier tactics, from terrorism to mass migration, to fulfill the spirit of their religion. The underlying imperative is to restore a conquering Islam capable of humiliating non-Muslims in Muslim lands and expanding into non-Muslim countries. That is why Saddam and Iran pursued weapons of mass destruction. Why Muslim armies tested themselves against Israel. Why Al Qaeda built a decentralized terrorist network with cells around the world.”

To add to our ISIL/ISIS/IS reading plan today, let me add one more article, not sure if JK or Malcolm posted this link, but I came across it somewhere in my internet travels: “What ISIS Really Wants”, by Graeme Wood at The Atlantic website.  Wood offers a meticuously detailed chronology of how ISIS developed and he offers this view on ISIS being truly Islamic:

“The reality is that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic. Yes, it has attracted psychopaths and adventure seekers, drawn largely from the disaffected populations of the Middle East and Europe. But the religion preached by its most ardent followers derives from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam.

Virtually every major decision and law promulgated by the Islamic State adheres to what it calls, in its press and pronouncements, and on its billboards, license plates, stationery, and coins, “the Prophetic methodology,” which means following the prophecy and example of Muhammad, in punctilious detail. Muslims can reject the Islamic State; nearly all do. But pretending that it isn’t actually a religious, millenarian group, with theology that must be understood to be combatted, has already led the United States to underestimate it and back foolish schemes to counter it. We’ll need to get acquainted with the Islamic State’s intellectual genealogy if we are to react in a way that will not strengthen it, but instead help it self-immolate in its own excessive zeal.”

And now we have our own US State Department effort – a newly unified Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, under the directorship of Richard Stengel, whom you may listen to speaking to an NPR reporter about the new strategy here.  He stated they’re looking for “credible new voices” (like Muslim Imams opposed to ISIS, former Islamic terrorists, etc.).  In other words, our government once again is on a search for illusive “moderate Muslims” to aid our fight, so expect this effort to work out as well as the search for those illusive “moderate Syrian rebels”.  And for those who want to say the administration is on the ball, catch this part in a February 16, 2015 New York Times report, “U.S. Intensifies Efforts to Blunt ISIS’ Message”:

““We’re getting beaten on volume, so the only way to compete is by aggregating, curating and amplifying existing content,” Richard A. Stengel, the under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, said by telephone on Monday. Until now, he said, the efforts to counter ISIS could have been better coordinated.

Many of the plan’s details are still being worked out, but administration officials are expected to describe at least its broad outlines during three days of meetings, sponsored by the White House and beginning Tuesday, intended to showcase efforts underway in the United States and abroad to combat what the authorities call violent extremism.”

In case you missed it: :Many of the plan’s details are still being worked out” , in other words, President Obama once again announced another #nothingburger “plan”.  Want some fries and Heinz ketchup with yours John Kerry?  Never fear though, those cheerleaders at the US State Department have their hashtag signs and tweets ready to fight the Islamic State….  One, two, everyone #Yes, We Can….

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics, Terrorism, The Media