A lecture on Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus by the late J. Rufus Fears, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma
Civic virtue: The willingness of the individual to subordinate himself to the good of the community
A lecture on Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus by the late J. Rufus Fears, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma
Civic virtue: The willingness of the individual to subordinate himself to the good of the community
Filed under American Character, General Interest, History, Public Corruption
CHAPTER XVII
A CORRUPT PEOPLE COMING INTO THEIR LIBERTY CAN MAINTAIN ITSELF FREE ONLY WITH THE GREATEST DIFFICULTY
I judge that it was necessary that Kings should be eliminated in Rome, or (else) that Rome would in a very short time become weak and of no valor; for considering to what (degree of) corruption those Kings had come, if it should have continued so for two or three successions, (and) that that corruption which was in them had begun to spread through its members; (and) as the members had been corrupted it was impossible ever again to reform her (the state). But losing the head while the torso was sound, they were able easily to return to a free and ordered society. And it ought to be presupposed as a very true matter that a corrupted City which exists under a Prince, even though that Prince with all his lives (family) may be extinguished, can never become free; and that rather it should happen that one Prince destroy the other, for (these people) will never be settled without the creation of a new Lord, who by his goodness together with his virtu will then keep them free: but that liberty will last only during his life time, as happened at different times in Syracuse to Dion and Timoleon, whose virtu while they lived, kept that City free: but when they died, it returned to the ancient Tyranny.
Discourses on Livy, written by Niccolò Machiavelli circa 1517, from www.constitution.org
So, Comey caved to the CORRUPT Clinton machine and now comes the Clinton version of “fast and furious”, in a flurry of political machinations from the most corrupt political machine in American history.
September 18, 2015: “State Dept. requests deleted Clinton emails from FBI”
October 7, 2015: “FBI Seizes Four State Department Servers in Clinton Email Probe”
June 6, 2016: “State Department Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton-Era TPP Emails Until After The Election”
July 12, 2016: “AG Lynch refuses to answer questions over 74 times”
July 12, 2016: “Clinton legal team moves to block deposition in email lawsuit”
July 12, 2016: “FBI to return thousands of recovered Clinton emails to State Department for potential release”
The Clinton legal eagles are working to shut down any more email releases. They want those recovered deleted emails, in FBI hands, back at the State Department, where they can make Hillary’s emails disappear there ( like the Rose Law Firm billing records).
Most of all they want to see what the FBI recovered and get that EVIDENCE out of the hands of the FBI. This assures that there will be NO FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Got it -THE FBI IS NOW CORRUPTED BY THE CLINTONS. The Clintons can do whatever they want.
There’s no one to stop them.
The Obama administration is CORRUPT all the way to the top.
The Obama administration email records disappear with as alarming frequency as Hillary’s emails. In the Obama administration all official government records are subject to editing, rewrite, or complete erasure to assure the official records fall in line with and support the Obama “narrative”. This is the old Soviet model, where you can replace “Soviet party line” with Obama “narrative” – the same modus operandi. . Efforts by the media, by private lawsuits, by governmental oversight agencies to investigate the Obama corruption continually meet this same stonewall effort. Obama officials proclaim due diligence, while emails waft off into the ether.
Attorny General, Loretta Lynch, old friend of the Clintons and top Clinton advisers, testified before the House Judiciary Committee yesterday, She completely stonewalled the Republican Congressmen’s questions about her decision not to indict Hillary Clinton. It was one of the most vile OPENLY CORRUPT public displays in American history, but then again she is part of the TOTALLY CORRUPT Clinton machine, part of the TOTALLY CORRUPT Obama administration, both of which are powerful leaders in the TOTALLY CORRUPT Democratic Party, which assuredly looks more and more like an organized criminal enterprise.
Corruption begets corruption!
We are now ruled by a political crime syndicate. To counter TOTALLY CORRUPT Hillary, the Republicans have CORRUPT, mercurial, Donald Trump, whom his handlers are trying to send out like a trained parrot with prepared comments, to avoid him blurting out crazy, incendiary, unhinged comments. Trump’s business dealings and mob connections (where reports surfaced of even Russian mob connections) bode poorly for the prospect of an honest Trump administration. Even his much touted Trump Foundation gives off warning signs that it could easily become as much a criminal enterprise as the Clinton Foundation, which I’ve covered in other posts, here, here, here.
Sadly, the path America is on leads only to a return to the ancient Tyranny.
#NeverTrump&NeverHillary
#NoMoreScorchedEarth
#SayNoToPublicCorruption
Filed under American Character, General Interest, History, Politics, Public Corruption, Uncategorized
Here’s a Washington Post opinion piece:
“Obama plans major nuclear policy changes in his final months”
An old LB blog post with my opinions on Global Zero:
Filed under General Interest, Military, Politics
“A tell in poker is a subtle but detectable change in a player’s behavior or demeanor that gives clues to that player’s assessment of his hand. A player gains an advantage if he observes and understands the meaning of another player’s tell, particularly if the tell is unconscious and reliable. Sometimes a player may fake a tell, hoping to induce his opponents to make poor judgments in response to the false tell.”
I’ve been thinking back over FBI Director, James Comey’s testimony before Congress last Thursday and once again the sequence of events leaves me pondering something he said, that struck me as a “tell”.
First the sequence of events:
In April, President Obama made a statement saying that Hillary’s behavior was not criminal and that national security had not been compromised. He also stated, per the LA Times:
“What I’ve also said is that — and she has acknowledged — that there’s a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she … recognizes,” he added. He added that she did an “outstanding job” as America’s top diplomat.” (my emphasis)
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-obama-clinton-20160410-story.html
The week before Comey announced his “recommendation”, President Obama had arranged to campaign with Hillary Clinton, in fact, they were on Air Force One heading to a campaign event, when Comey gave his public announcement.
That same week, Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, had a clandestine meeting with former President Bill Clinton on her plane at the airport in Phoenix, AZ. Lynch came out and proclaimed it was all just an innocent meeting, where they talked about grandchildren, their travels and BREXIT. She acted contrite and admitted it was a mistake.
Then on July 1, 2016, Loretta Lynch announced she won’t recuse herself, but she will abide by the FBI recommendation.
Saturday, July, 2, 2016, Hillary met with the FBI for 3.5 hours. Judging by subsequent events, they might have discussed the grandchildren and her yoga routines, because the FBI did not videotape or transcribe their chat. “Interview” seems too professional of a term for this charade.
Last week, on July 5, 2016, James Comey made his surprise announcement and did not recommend an indictment.
Republican heads exploded, after Comey laid out the laundry list of conduct that Hillary Clinton and her top aides engaged in, that read like a very damning list of charges in an indictment, but at the last minute he blithely brushed it all aside as “extremely careless“, but despite that, he argued against an indictment. He stated that no reasonable prosecutor would indict. He gave the Clintons what was demanded, I firmly believe.
Last Thursday, July 7, 2016, Comey testified before Congress and without rehashing the legalities, it’s the one incongruent comment he made that struck me, as if he was unintentionally telling us something. He seemed pained and almost embarrassed by some of his tortured explanations to explain how “extremely careless” differs from “grossly negligent”. He went to great lengths about how Hillary’s celebrity requires that she be treated “fairly”. She was NOT a celebrity, she was one of our nation’s highest-level government officials and she grossly violated that trust. Government officials, in whom great trust is placed, should be held to the highest standards – not treated like a “celebrity”. All the Democrats shameless pandering to him and lauding his integrity seemed to make him uncomfortable.
The tell was when Comey testified that he cares most about his family and his reputation. When he said that, I thought it odd, when what he should be most concerned about is protecting and defending The Constitution. His testimony seemed to me a desperate self-preservation effort to salvage his reputation (and protect his family), which he completely compromised with falling in line with the Clinton “talking points”. When you submit to the Clinton intimidation, they own you. With all the Bill Clinton strong-arm tactics employed to clear the path to the White House for Hillary, everyone whom Bill Clinton has pressured, from Obama through Loretta Lynch, Comey was hailed as the exemplar of integrity. I believe Bill Clinton’s enforcers let Comey know they have some very personal dirt on him that would hurt his family and his reputation. The Clinton sewer rats, as I’ve said many times, operate like the old KGB. If there’s any dirt, they will find it. There is no sewer too vile for them to scurry through. The Clintons are not only above the law, but a law unto themselves.
Friday, July, 6 2016, Loretta Lynch came out and followed the talking points to the letter – she announced that she accepted the FBI recommendation.
Time to move on…
Filed under American Character, General Interest, Politics, Public Corruption
“Civilization is built on the practice of keeping promises. It may not sound a high attainment, but if trust in its observance be shaken the whole structure cracks and sinks. Any constructive effort and all human relations – personal, political, and commercial – depend on being able to depend on promises.”
– B.H. Liddell Hart, “Why We Don’t Learn From History”
The massacre of police officers in Dallas late Thursday night, that left 11 police officers shot, 5 fatally, continues to fuel politicians, pundits, political activists and assorted “experts” filling the airwaves and internet with analysis, insights, context, and plenty of SPIN (LIES). All these public mouthpieces yammer on about how to fix “this problem”. Politicians make a living talking about “the problems”, but hardly ever fix any of them. “This problem”, is not just black and white.
There are politicians fueling BLM, starting with President Obama and his minions at the White House. There are black grievance industry activists, many whom have become rich off the backs of “civil rights” activism in America. There are politicians on the right drawing a red line on the 2nd Amendment. There are two presidential campaigns trying to capitalize on looking “presidential” in this crisis. There are police officers across America outraged, saddened and worrying about how to protect their fellow citizens, while feeling under attack and more and more like walking targets wearing their uniforms. There are many angry black people being encouraged to take to the streets and demand “justice”. There are many angry white people too…… some racists, some who feel their right to own guns is under attack, some who are outraged about the police being attacked, etc., etc., etc. Again, “this problem” isn’t just black and white.
There is the Black Lives Matter movement, which at this point should be investigated by federal law enforcement, as to who is funding the movement, who is leading this movement, and determining if this group should be designated a terrorist group. BLM sure looks like an anarchist organization, working to fuel racial discord, encourage attacks on civil law enforcement and to fuel a breakdown of American society.
Fueling racial tensions in America has been a staple tactic of communist, far-left factions, and it is part of the political playbook of people very close to the Obama administration. Sorry, that’s the truth. Van Jones was part of an anarchist movement, an avowed Marxist and an advocate of inciting race wars to advance political change in America. President Obama follows the Cloward-Piven political strategy.
The mainstream press mentions President Obama’s background as a “community organizer” in Chicago often, but they never really explain the history of “community organizing”. Saul Alinksy, an American radical, dedicated to fueling racial tensions for political purposes, founded community organizing and whether you are a leftist who believes, you should never let a crisis go to waste, as Rahm Emmanuel once stated, or a right-winger, like Rush Limbaugh, who has filled talk radio with warnings about Alinsky, Cloward-Piven and political race hustlers, the fact is community organizing is all about sensationalizing racially charged issues for political purposes. That’s it in a nutshell.
Now, here’s a small snapshot of race interactions I saw last week.
Yesterday afternoon I was sitting in my primary care doctor’s waiting room. I had a bad week with my blood sugar and despite several medication changes in the past year to get my Type 2 diabetes back under control, it’s still not. Being put on insulin may be in my near future. Bad week is waking up Monday morning feeling nauseated, with a really bad headache, and feeling like my head was in a fog. Checked my blood sugar, 350. It’s down now, but not down where it needs to be. So, if some of my blog posts this past week were really bad, I’ll use the excuse that my head was in a fog from my diabetes, lol.
So, I was sitting there waiting to see my wonderful, Syrian-born doctor, whom I really think the world of, because beyond being a very good doctor, he always takes the time to talk to me like a person, not just a number. Some doctors treat you like you’re just a list of symptoms on a page to examine, diagnose and prescribe a remedy. My doctor looks me in the eye and listens to me.
While in his waiting room, CNN was playing on the TV, with more news on the Dallas massacre.
There were several other patients waiting, some white, some black. The receptionists were two black ladies. The receptionists know me as an established patient and they’re always smiling, helpful and wonderful. The other patients all behaved courteously and as I waited this elderly white lady showed up, walking with a cane.
I don’t know this lady’s name and the next time I see her, I need to get her name, but we know each other from my doctor’s waiting room and my work in a local store, where she shops often. She sat down next to me and we picked up talking about what’s been going on in our lives since the last time we chatted, without even a moment’s hesitation.
I wrote about this elderly white lady in a 2013 blog post, “An afternoon in the doctor’s waiting room”, and I’m going to repost the first and last paragraph of that post:
“We’re approaching that American holiday that’s come to symbolize two diverse cultures, American settlers and American Indians, oops Native Americans or whatever is the PC-approved term, sitting together to share a meal and offer thanks to God for a successful harvest. Agrarian societies through the ages have held similar celebrations at the end of the harvest season. The unique component of our Thanksgiving rests heavily on our national self-image of a melting pot of cultures living in harmony, where Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream of a place where we will “sit down at a table of brotherhood” evokes a national yearning for the America we hope we can someday be.”
And it ended:
“It’s not about making race the central theme at the dinner table, but to learn to make a seat at the table and feed as many people as possible that will lead us to the fulfillment of Martin Luther King’s dream. Only by taking the time to get to know people, can you ever find out who they are. People will surprise you, if you let them. She told me that she won a motorcycle in a raffle recently, but she traded it in for a new Harley-Davidson trike. She ended our conversation by telling me, her husband doesn’t have to ask her twice if she wants to ride, because she has always loved to ride motorcycles.”
This lady’s son is a pastor working to build up a congregation for a non-denominational Protestant church and back in 2013 she invited me to her son’s church and yesterday she invited me again. She wasn’t pushy, but sincere, just as a black lady, who came to my door this week, inviting me to her Jehovah’s Witness church was sincere and seemed to be a very nice lady. Unlike many people, who get angry at Jehovah’s Witnesses coming to the door, I try always to be polite, because when I was young and newly married, a pair of them showed up at my door and I talked to them. I wasn’t so much curious about their religion, but why they go door-to-door, despite getting doors slammed in their face often. So, I asked them.
These two ladies pointed me to a Bible verse, Mark 6:7:
“And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits”
They explained that they go by twos to spread the Gospel. Now, I am not going to dissect their entire church doctrine, because I am not qualified, but just having a general understanding about why they do go door-to-door helped me to be more tolerant and respectful when they come to my door.
Last week, my friend, Gladius, a Southern Baptist, emailed me an audio link of a sermon, “The Faith of Our Founding Fathers”, which he gave at his local church last Sunday. He discussed the Christian faith of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence. He laid out how much they put on the line by signing that declaration:
“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Gladius gave the statistics on how much many of the signers sacrificed, with many giving their very lives, during the Revolutionary War, to secure the freedoms most Americans take for granted today. A goodly number of them died fighting in the Revolutionary War, and while Gladius didn’t go into the grim details, here are a couple examples of what the men and women of the American Revolution sacrificed, from an article by Dr. Harold Pease, “The price paid for your liberty”:
“Unable to capture Abraham Clark, another signatory, the British took their wrath out on his two sons, who were imprisoned on the notorious prison ship Jersey. “Word was sent to Clark that his boys would be freed if he would disown the revolutionary cause and praise the British Crown. At his refusal, his sons were singled out for cruel treatment. One was placed in a tiny cell and given no food. Fellow prisoners kept him alive by laboriously pushing tiny bits of food through a keyhole. Both sons somehow survived their ordeal.””
Here’s another patriot’s sacrifice:
” The British had a particular zeal for destroying the homes and property of the signers. Those suffering this fate included Benjamin Harrison, George Clymer, Dr. John Witherspoon, Philip Livingston, William Hooper and William Floyd. The sacrifices of John Hart and Francis Lewis are particularly noteworthy. “While his wife lay gravely ill, Redcoats destroyed Hart’s growing crops and ripped his many grist mills to pieces. Bent on taking him, they chased him for several days. They almost nabbed him in a wooded area, but he hid in a cave. When he returned home with his health broken, he found his wife dead and their 13 children scattered.””
Dr. Pease states:
“Probably John Quincy Adams, a son of one of the 55 patriots making the above pledge and later a president of the United States, said it best. “Posterity — You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it.” Let us never forget that liberty is not free. It was purchased and maintained by the blood of those before us.”
Gladius brought this same question to the forefront, “How much would you sacrifice for liberty?” It is something all Americans need to think about.
America does need people willing to fight with all their might to preserve our liberty, but truthfully, as one who abhors violence and loves America, perhaps the best way to fight for The Constitution is to quit with the warring political factions, quit with the endless partisan hot-headed rhetoric, quit with all the pointing fingers, but most of all:
“QUIT TREATING FELLOW AMERICANS AS YOUR ENEMY!”“
– Libertybelle, July 9, 2016
It’s time we all work as hard as we can to be Good Citizens.
It’s time for us to fight as hard as we can to unite as one nation dedicated to a common purpose – “Protecting and defending The Constitution”.
Perhaps, if we pledge “our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor” to preserving our great nation, America can truly fulfill the dream expressed so eloquently by Martin Luther King, Jr. and at long last, “sit down at a table of brotherhood”
Words matter.
From Merriam-Webster:
Full Definition of fundamental
1a : serving as an original or generating source : primary <a discovery fundamental to modern computers>b : serving as a basis supporting existence or determining essential structure or function : basic
2a : of or relating to essential structure, function, or facts : radical <fundamental change>;also : of or dealing with general principles rather than practical application <fundamentalscience>b : adhering to fundamentalism
3: of, relating to, or produced by the lowest component of a complex vibration
4: of central importance : principal <fundamental purpose>
5: belonging to one’s innate or ingrained characteristics : deep-rooted <her fundamentalgood humor>
And:
Full Definition of transformation
1
: an act, process, or instance of transforming or being transformed
2
: false hair worn especially by a woman to replace or supplement natural hair
3
a (1) : the operation of changing (as by rotation or mapping) one configuration or expression into another in accordance with a mathematical rule; especially : a change of variables or coordinates in which a function of new variables or coordinates is substituted for each original variable or coordinate (2) : the formula that effects a transformation
b : function 5a
c : an operation that converts (as by insertion, deletion, or permutation) one grammatical string (as a sentence) into another; also : a formal statement of such an operation
4
: genetic modification of a bacterium by incorporation of free DNA from another bacterial cell; also : genetic modification of a cell by the uptake and incorporation of exogenous DNA
And:
Full Definition of transform
transitive verb
1a: to change in composition or structureb: to change the outward form or appearance ofc: to change in character or condition :convert
2: to subject to mathematical transformation
3: to cause (a cell) to undergo genetic transformation
intransitive verb
: to become transformed:change
Americans need to wake-up to what President Obama’s “fundamental transformation” really means, very soon. The Obama administration “fundamental transformation” continues at warp speed. He has hacked away at The Constitution, while his administration openly and brazenly engages in corruption, then feeds the American public “narratives” (made up stories).
This FBI charade, giving Hillary Clinton a free pass, set a new legal standard – “extremely careless” (ABOVE THE LAW). Today’s Congressional testimony by FBI Director Comey pained me to watch – he admitted that Hillary’s interview to the FBI wasn’t even under oath. She allowed her IT people and her lawyers access to classified information, despite them not having the security clearance required to handle that information or having a need to know that information. Director Comey sacrificed his integrity in such an obvious manner, that his parsing rivaled former President Bill Clinton’s amazing linguistic feints. One off-hand comment of Comey’s says it all. He said he can argue both sides of any case…… indeed. He did a spectacular job defending Hillary Clinton today. Her entire home-brew email server was set up to hide her State Department emails from scrutiny (that’s her INTENT). She walked away from the State Department with all of the official State Department records she generated housed in her home. Her lawyers destroyed around 30,000 of those emails without any outside review and Comey insists there was no intention to obstruct justice or harm the United States… Director Comey sullied not only his reputation today, but he tarnished the FBI’s reputation today too.
The hearing today was the same old partisan kabuki theater – the Democrats will declare it a right-wing witch hunt, the liberal media will bury the story and focus on destroying Donald Trump. Some of the Republicans do act out of partisan motives too. So, once again we have the partisans engaged in this same old game, but the Clinton/Obama corruption has reached epic levels The entire system is not only rigged, this is wholesale public corruption.
Then there’s Donald J. Trump, pretending to be the “GOP Insurgent” working at redefining the Republican Party, all while keeping the GOP 2016 presidential campaign ensnared in endless controversies. He spouts a mishmash of mind-blowingly idiotic comments and rah-rah tough talk, with no core principles. He’s a total fraud.
President Obama’s “fundamental transformation” includes our military and includes a rapid and ruthless social engineering restructuring, downsizing, all while military readiness remains dangerously insufficient.
Every American should be very worried with our federal ship of state…
It’s heading toward an iceberg…
Impacting soon…
Reason TV put together the “facts”:
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, Public Corruption