Stealing an Arkie blog post

Found this comment on the Diplomas2.0 blog (here), that sums up this pathetic administration perfectly:

 Couldn’t he have come out and said something along the lines of, “Given what is happening at the Naval Yard, we will postpone this event.”

“Team” Obama couldn’t take the chance President Obama would say,

“If I had a son he’d look like Aaron Alexis.”

Arkie

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

Oh, those pesky “facts”

The UK Telegraph ran a report today from IHS Jane’s, stating that nearly half of the rebel fighters in Syria are hardline Islamists/jihadis (report here).  According to Charles Lister, the author of the report, the idea that the insurgency is mostly secular in nature, just isn’t borne out by the facts.  Just a reminder that a week and a half ago  John Kerry was still quoting Ms. Elizabeth O’Bagy, former senior analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, with her lowball estimates of radical Syrian rebels (Reuters report here).   My how “facts” change so quickly ……..

6 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics, The Media

The defining generational shift

Thanks Justin for all the kind words about my blog and for pointing out so many great blogs and sites to check out.  Duff&Nonsense: entertaining, erudite, chock full of that British understated ruthlessness – love it.  Gypsy Scholar: covers the gambit and not easily pigeon-holed into a particular category – a well-written, eclectic mix of commentary.  Just this morning I started reading waka, waka, waka, Malcolm Pollack’s blog:  plan to spend days reading through his archives – the writing is top-notch.  I’m sure their blog lists contain many more blogs worth perusing. I’d like to venture out on a limb about Gypsy Scholar’s recent post.

Gypsy Scholar posted a piece, “Nonlinearity: E-Books vs. Physical Books“, which delves into the pros and cons of e-readers, when matched up against physical books and it led me to ponder this matter a bit further and after I pondered this a bit, I thought about how truly spoiled we, who bask in the modern world of luxury, are to have so many varied ways to access information, great literature, connect with other people around the globe.  Certainly, anyone who has ever tried to find the index or bibliography of an e-book, knows the frustration of simply flipping through the pages of a physical book and trying to do that with an e-reader.  As technology improves, my optimistic nature leads me to feel confident that glitch will eventually be ironed out.

Writer’s warning: Proceed at your own risk, the following rambling post is this writer’s “oh the demise of American culture” rant of the day.

The trickier problem seems to lie in the sad fact that there’s no cure for stupid and the handing tech toys to most of the world’s inhabitants seems to spread  a “too-dumb-to-exist” virus faster than 4G access.  Yes, it’s been a long time since I posted a pet peeve, but here goes.  Everywhere you wander in America (even perhaps around the globe, if news footage is reliable) you see the masses, preoccupied with their cell phones, iphones, tablets, etc.  Often my mean-streak breaks loose and I wonder, “these $%^#!* morons can’t even string together a coherent sentence, so what in the Hades can they be texting about all day long?”  Yes, I really do think things like this and on occasion, my nice, demure self lets thoughts like this slip from my lips…….. accidentally, of course.  American culture teeters toward the end of a three act play, where no one remembers the first two acts and we’re zooming to a climatic final scene, curtains poised to drop and there we slouch slurping our big drinks……..  glibly unaware.

For the bibliophiles, an e-reader offers us one more way to indulge our obsessive passion for acquiring books and just the knowledge that I’m carrying around a small home library’s worth of books in my purse makes me feel giddy.  No longer am I left flipping through outdated, grubby magazines,  while waiting to see the doctor nor do I have to suffer making or enduring aimless small talk, with lengthy rambles about the size of one’s kidney stones or some undiagnosed “rash”.  It’s so convenient to pull out my e-reader or tablet and block out the other inhabitants, so yes, technology serves as a very useful barrier to unwanted social interaction.  But for all these wonderful uses, I work and interact with ordinary people and way too often I hear people tell me they bought an e-reader and haven’t really used it yet or worse I’ve heard the following comment more than a handful of times, “I bought a kindle, but I don’t really read books”  Yes, acquiring these gadgets is about acquiring these gadgets – not really expanding one’s reading options.

In the early years of owning a PC, one bright morning my children were getting ready for school and living in a very temperate Southern state, we don’t get much in the way of cold weather (although Southerners bundle in big parkas as soon as the temperature drops below 60°F).  One of my sons rushed to the PC and he had to go online to find out if it was cold enough to wear a jacket.  In dismay, I blurted out, “Are you stupid?  Just step out on the front porch and find out!”  He looked at me, affronted by my ignorance, and said, “Mom that’s not as accurate as the weather online.”  Many times I’ve thought back to this as the defining generational shift in America – those who lived before computers and actually had to rely on their own brainpower to figure things out and the PC generation, where if someone wrote about it online it trumps even trusting you own up close and personal experience (even if that weather info came from several hundred miles away).

The love of books seems a more full-bodied experience than ownership of an e-reader.  There’s something awe-inspiring to meander along rows of books in a beautiful old library or even to find a small makeshift library tucked into a few fourth-floor rooms on a tiny US Army kaserne in Germany.  Often, I would bundle my youngest daughter into her car seat and we’d head to this library on Schloss Kaserne, after I got my other children off to school. I’d find some story books for her and some books for me and we’d find a comfy seat and spend several hours at a time reading.  Very few people used that library and my husband and other children turned their noses up at this tiny library, but for me it brought back childhood memories of sitting for hours in our old pastor’s attic, where his wife kept all her old magazines and excess books stored on neat shelves, in perfect order.  She had every edition of some magazines going back to the 1920s, when she had married our pastor.

The first thing I notice about any book is the binding.  I admire lovely bindings and that’s before I even open the cover.  An e-reader can never copy that feel of a book between your hands, but the ease of accessing so many classics, histories and information so easily offers a huge trade-off.  Would that we could copy good teaching methods as easily as we copy books to digitized formats.  Our pastor’s wife (mentioned in several previous posts) spent her time being a good pastor’s wife – helped in the church, helped in the community, helped us with our many reports and school projects.  And yet, by training she had attended Teachers College Columbia University in the mid-1920s and I most assuredly benefited from her many years of informally teaching me.  My brothers, sisters and I  would run across the road to the parsonage whenever we needed more information than our books at home offered.  She would stop whatever she was doing and devote as much time as needed to help us find information and offer advice.  This lovely woman would bookmark passages from books, pages in magazines and write notes of things she thought I should read.

I think that the issue confronting us is lazy self-indulgence, where failing schools is just a small part of the problem – just walk into any big box store, where the majority of Americans shop.  The book section rarely is crowded, yet the electronics area, particularly the gaming section usually swarms with young men.  What are the girls shopping for – mostly clothes, freakish hair color, looking for “as seen on TV” merchandise.  And it’s the rare shopper who isn’t otherwise preoccupied with his/her cellphone.  There, I’ve said it, we have the laziest, most self-indulgent culture on planet earth and that’s what’s ailing America.

5 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Pet Peeves

A face-saving exercise

Our President, negotiator extraordinaire, will bask in the glow of reaching a “diplomatic” solution to his Syrian debacle.  The Russians, with their seasoned, highly competent diplomat, Sergei Lavrov, laid down the terms while John Kerry pontificated on and on and on.  At the end, the Russians insist that the US seek no UN authorization to use force, if Assad does not comply and they insist the US not refer Assad to the International Criminal Court for possible war crimes prosecution. (Washington Post story here).

“Oh,  libertybelle, you mean-spirited, partisan witch, how dare you laugh and say, ‘what a bunch of crapola!’?  You just don’t understand how to play weapons inspections charades, so hush your mean-spirited mutterings, you hater!  After all, what would you know after watching this game played for over a decade with Saddam…….”.  Like lambs to the slaughter, Putin leads them and here I am talking to myself……..

No leader is going to relinquish a potent weapons arsenal in the midst of an existential struggle, unless he is being given some other potent weaponry (in large supplies, with training included too) to win the struggle he’s engaged in.  The Russians would have to assure him of victory and even then the logistics of implementing a weapons inspection plan in the midst of a bloody civil war would make me wonder which countries will want their weapons inspectors walking into that.  It’s all a big smokescreen to give Obama cover for his Syrian missteps and the Russians will continue to run this show.  We have just traded away American influence in the region in nothing more than a face-saving exercise.  Did I miss John Kerry packing Jane Fonda in his suitcase, to help him “negotiate” away American prestige?  And our lovely, objective mainstream press is lapping it up and praising this as a “breakthrough”, not a breakdown of American standing in the Mid-East and beyond.

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics

Daily Chat

Perhaps a menu on the sidebar with a “Daily Chat” link would allow a space for posters to toss anything into the mix of discussions.  Let me see if my limited computer skills can allow for me to post a new menu.

45 Comments

Filed under Daily Chat

Institute for the Study of War fires Elizabeth O’Bagy

Politico and PJ Media report that the Institute for the Study of War fired Elizabeth O’Bagy, their senior analyst and resident expert on Syria.  According to ISW, Dr. O’Bagy lied on her application and does not possess a doctorate degree, nor did she disclose her connections to the Syrian Emergency Task Force (stories here and here).  Let’s hope ISW reviews their hiring procedures and institutes a more thorough vetting process, since it took me less than five minutes to figure out her connection to this Syrian rebel advocacy group. One can hope John McCain and John Kerry pause to reflect that this young woman might be aligned with a foreign entity and that the way this played out makes them willing dupes.  Nah, never happen with those egotistical windbags. The other big takeaway from this from my purely contrarian nature concerns our national intelligence gathering and analysis.  One can only pause to wonder what official intelligence on the disposition of the Syrian rebel forces crossed the desks of Kerry and McCain, if they felt this dubious young lady’s reporting carried more weight.  We pay a fortune on intelligence gathering, but do we focus enough on the human intelligence and analytical components to sift through our vast stores of information and actually piece together an accurate and timely intelligence product?

9 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics

The sun will come out tomorrow…….

Time for some deep-breathing exercises, so I don’t blurt out some truly regrettable @%#$&^! things.  “Calm thyself, libertybelle, for they know not what they speak!”  Who in the Hades with a functioning brain cell believes that Syria relinquishing their WMD to a third party country could physically happen in the midst of a bloody civil war?  Just the actual logistics of that, ponder that for a moment.  Then, ponder what rational country would send teams into this hotbed to retrieve WMD???  So, obviously, even a half-wit should see that Putin was playing Obama (masterfully, I might add) and yet the punditry, by and large, this bunch of clowns at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., and assorted Congressional folks yammer on and on about this WMD collection as if it’s a real breakthrough and even feasible.  And on top of that, they’re plagued by  short-term memory deficiencies, because we spent many years, endured endless media embarrassments playing WMD hide and seek just next door to Syria.  Oops, the media forgot how this game is played…….. idiots!  Putin offers this old, leaky lifeboat to Obama and the American press ignores that it’s sinking.  And Obama doesn’t care, at least he doesn’t have to decide on airstrikes now and who knows he might be able to bail water fast enough to avoid drowning and maybe if he’s lucky, the sharks aren’t lying in wait for him.  Can’t you hear the Annie, tune, “tomorrow, tomorrow….” playing in the background of his speech………..(sing along here)

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics

Our Very Own Perfect Polly

offer_details

Someone can tell me later what all our fearless leader droned on about, but ten minutes in my tolerance for pain got the better of me.  Just yesterday, I proclaimed some freakish, fake parakeet, Perfect Polly, the most bizarre thing possible.  Who on earth would want to listen to a fake parakeet chirp, I pondered, and yet here I was listening to a fake world leader chirp on and on about how we can’t tolerate the use of chemical weapons, with gut-wrenching detail of the victims.  He chirped and chirped, leaving this unsettling feeling that just maybe Perfect Polly could have delivered a more convincing speech…….

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics

Benghazi: the Obama hens prepare to cluck, cluck, cluck

Roger L. Simon penned a withdrawal of his support for Obama’s (not quite war) Syrian adventure at PJ Media- “Going to War with the Blind General of Benghazi (An Apology)”, filled with apologies for ever supporting going to war with a leader who lacks a moral compass.  Our fearless leader demonstrated he’s willing to use dead Americans as props for a photo-op, when he and Madame Secretary greeted the return of our slain from Benghazi.  He went on for months (ok weeks) with a fabricated story about the YouTube video.  For those who say American credibility is at stake in Syria, well, unless the rest of the world is deaf, dumb and blind, they already figured out we have a weak, mendacious, arrogant, indecisive, leading-from-behind “commander” rallying the troops.  Yay, he makes me want to salute and sign on………ok……….. not so much.  He’s sent out, who better than,  Mr. I-Was-For-It-Before-I-Was-Against-It Kerry, to sell this military action to other foreign leaders, with presses gleefully running photos of the Kerrys and Assads cozily dining together, oh memories, lalala, misty watercolor memories of the way we were.  Never fear though, the dragon lady of Benghazi, aka the smartest woman in the world, returns to assist her replacement, according to morning news updates on Fox News.  Who better to put forth an administration tough stance (just give her a sword to wave above her head), so she can shriek, “What difference at this point does it make!”  If the farce couldn’t take a more decided veer into sheer bedlam, he’s sending Susan Rice to testify before Congress, on 9/11 no less.

14 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military

G. Murphy Donovan’s good hygiene primer:-)

G. Murphy Donovan writes frequently on intelligence matters and I often think of him as the George Will of the intelligence gurus – often way over my head, where I have to keep my dictionary nearby to look up some of the words, lol.  Well, who knew he could be funny as hell, but this August piece he wrote, “The Legacy of Tribes“ in the New English Review had me laughing out loud.

You’re in store for gems like, “A serious Jew even bathes his chickens. Indeed, after a Kosher chicken gets naked, it is immersed in a salt bath; very hygienic and very tasty too. The mythic qualities of chicken soup are a function of salt, hygiene, and heat. Consider all those cultural contrasts with Arab neighbors. A real, as opposed to a ritual, bath is often the difference between winners and losers.”  Now, to set the tribal record straight, the Jews aren’t the only ones to subject their poultry to a salt bath, because PA Dutch farm women have been doing that for centuries too.  According to the female elders amongst my PA Dutch clan, it’s considered settled science that the salt draws all the impurities and blood out of the bird, resulting in better tasting poultry.  Who am I to question what obviously works based on successful PA Dutch cooking for centuries?  And now I learn this is a wise Jewish tribal practice too, who knew, it’s such a small world after all…

5 Comments

Filed under Food for Thought, History