The other side of the “swap”

Politico now has the other side of the Obama hostage release “swap”:

“As part of a prisoner swap with Iran, President Barack Obama granted clemency to seven men of Iranian origin either facing criminal charges in U.S. courts or already serving time in U.S. prison, an American official confirmed Saturday.”

The article continues:

“While an official confirmed Obama issued seven grants of clemency in the deal with the Iranians, spokespeople at the Justice Department and the White House did not immediately release the names of those spared in the U.S. legal system.

However, Iran’s Fars news agency released seven names, which correspond with U.S. court records on pending or recent cases.

Obama appeared to have granted rare, pre-trial pardons to three men awaiting trial in Houston for violating U.S. export laws by shipping high-tech equipment to Iran: Bahram Mechanic and Tooraj Faridi of Houston and Khosrow Afghahi of Los Angeles.

On Saturday, prosecutors moved to drop charges against Matin Sadeghi, a fugitive in the same case who was being sought in a wanted poster available on the FBI website. A court filing said the move was undertaken “based on significant foreign policy interests of the United States.””

And in typical Obama administration obfuscation the 7 turns into more:

“A U.S. official confirmed charges were dropped in cases involving 14 individuals. The moves will allow those individuals to travel more freely outside Iran.

“The United States also removed any Interpol red notices and dismissed any charges against 14 Iranians for whom it was assessed that extradition requests were unlikely to be successful,” the official said.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/01/iran-deal-obama-grants-clemency-to-seven-217879#ixzz3xSqKckwo

 

9 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics

America taken for a Persian magic carpet ride

Here’s another opinion piece on the US sailor hostage situation: “Calling BS on the official story of the Iranian capture of two US riverine boats”

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/calling_bs_on_the_official_story_of_the_iranian_capture_of_two_us_riverine_boats.html#ixzz3xS32lqQz
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Comments and insights are welcomed, because so far every bit of information the Obama administration utters doesn’t make any sense.

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

Iran: ‘American Sailors Started Crying After Arrest’

A senior Iranian military commander in charge of the country’s Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed t

Source: Iran: ‘American Sailors Started Crying After Arrest’

Well, the Iranian propaganda blitz continues and so far neither the President of the United States nor the Chairman of the JCS have spoken publicly, but the Secretary of Defense gave some kudos to John Kerry’s diplomacy. Quite the confidence-inspiring chain of command we’ve got here……

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military

The plot thickens, runaway narrative or fatal system error?

Yesterday afternoon The Daily Caller ran an article on the US sailors captured/released by Iran, adding more pieces that do nothing to fill in this puzzle.  Before delving into this chapter of the Obama Chronicles, let me toss out another odd bit of news released just this morning, from FOX news,  stating Iran is releasing the US prisoners,  it has been holding, in a swap.   A “swap” where the full terms of what the US swapped seems unclear, but I’ll quote my husband, who responded to my question, asking if he heard anything about who the US is “swapping”, “No, they haven’t released that information yet, but whoever it is, we won’t like it once we find out!”  Assuredly true!

Watching these Obama “narratives” unfold follows a familiar pattern – ever-evolving “facts”, shifting story lines, major plot twist, turns, even complete rewrites, where the administration feverishly tries to use mass media propaganda techniques to create mass delusion.  By dragging their feet, throwing out numerous false leads, obfuscations to goad a reaction from the Republicans, who always take the bait, the administration successfully casts the Republican reaction as the problem and just more partisan politics or right-wing witch hunts.  The original matter in question fades into the background, while the partisan rancor takes center stage as the “real problem”.

The Daily Caller article mentioned above states:

“Congress wants to know if the State Department held any influence on the U.S. Navy sailor who apologized to Iran after he and his nine other sailors were arrested and detained by the regime. The video, which aired on Iranian television, showed all ten sailors kneeling on the decks of their ships with their hands behind their heads.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/15/did-obama-admin-speak-to-sailors-before-video-apology-congress-wants-answers/#ixzz3xQXDQeHS

John Kerry pompously hurled snide attacks toward the Bush administration’s war-mongering, while bragging about his brilliant diplomacy in this matter.  He rambled on about  how a few years back a situation like this would have led to a war.  Josh Earnest, the puppet-on-a-string, bobbed about, but recited his ludicrous talking points in a serious tone, asserting that the Iranian photos and video of our sailors kneeling before Iranian forces is nothing to be embarrassed about.  Really???   Why and how these US sailors were captured remains unclear.  The Kerry State Department diplomacy effort also remains unclear.  The young US commander’s apology seems quite clear – he apologized to Iran.  The Pentagon has remained mum about details, in fact, the Pentagon seems to have abdicated its command of US Forces to John Kerry and the State Department.

An anonymous leak from the Pentagon suggested that the US sailor’s apology came after contact with the US State Department,   Was the sailor told to apologize by the Kerry State Department?   Why isn’t the Defense Department speaking to an incident involving US sailors?

All the incident specific questions will lead to the usual partisan charges and counter-charges, along with the added fuel being tossed on by 2016 Presidential contenders and their campaign teams.  None of this gets to the larger system failure of the US Armed Forces corrupted chain of command, which really is  a grave national security risk.  In the last three US administrations I believe this occurred, to varying degrees.  The politicization and enforced regimen of political correctness within the US military also escalated, where we now have retired generals forming partisan cheerleading squads for the two major political parties in the US.  Each political party even has its own set of  retired top brass to parade out to sell their political agenda and fight it out in a propaganda war on TV news and in print media.

Just a few short examples to make the general point, during the Clinton administration, bad military decisions were followed by gauging public opinion polls before making a decision and those decisions were subject to change by a dip in the opinion polls – polls guided the Clinton foreign policy, not substance  nor long-term US national strategic interests.  The Bush administration stuck to a foreign policy in the Mid-East based on two tracks, the  “war on terror,  no safe havens for terrorists” and a belief that democratization was the magic pill to cure the Islamic malignancy known by many names, radical Jihad, radical Islam, Islamism, Islamic imperialism, Wahabbism, but never acknowledging the “holy war” and religious components to this malignancy.  PC often overruled acknowledging and speaking to hard facts in the Bush White House and while they did use military force, they were reluctant to acknowledge serious strategic failings or facts on the ground that differed with their policy.  The Obama administration tries to run two separate US foreign policies, of the shabby caliber of tin-pot dictators, where they’ll use one set of talking points for foreign leaders and a completely different set for domestic partisan political consumption.  You could liken it to a Wizard of Oz operational system.

Within the Obama administration, all semblance of a clear-cut organizational control structure collapsed and herein lies the serious big picture system failure.  In each Obama administration scandal a pattern of obfuscation emerges, which ends up being cast as a partisan witch hunt of Republicans out to get them.  Democrat partisans in Congress and the media serve as willing purveyors of the Obama “narratives”.  The Republican partisans rant and rave and conduct endless investigations, that lead nowhere.  A recent example demonstrating this point is the collusion of Democrats in Congress,  who aided in obstructing  the 13 hours of Hillary Benghazi testimony.   The Democrats on that committee stuck to an organized talking points campaign to obstruct the Republicans.  There was obvious collusion between the Clinton camp and Congressional Democrats to orchestrate this.  The Republicans threw everything, except the kitchen sink at Hillary Clinton in their questioning, but never honed in on specific wrongdoing.

The release of the Benghazi movie, 13 Hours, revived public interest in the so-called “stand down order”.  The Obama administration tried to pin the attack on Benghazi on an obscure filmmaker, but it’s obvious the attack was a pre-planned terrorist attack.  Hillary Clinton sent the terrorist explanation to her daughter in an email and to an Egyptian official, while publicly stating the filmmaker caused a spontaneous riot in Benghazi.  Then you add in the “stand down order” question and here is my question:  “Why on earth would the Secretary of State be considered as a source for a stand down order given to the US military?”

This, who is in charge in the Obama administration and who makes the decisions and calls the shots, remains nebulous.  President Obama has not come out and made any statements on the US sailors being taken hostage by Iran.  It appears John Kerry speaks for both the State Department and the Defense Department, with an assist from the Vice President, Joe Biden.  Often, Valerie Jarrett’s name gets tossed around as the force within the White House or narratives by Ben Rhodes, a political flunkie with no military or foreign policy experience.  So, where are the Joint Chiefs of Staff in military matters in this administration and what in the heck is the chain of command if a State Department official instructed an US commander on what to do when held hostage by an American adversary, whose government rants, “Death to America!”?  This lack of a clear-cut chain of command puts US troops in grave danger!

With the laxity of operational behavior, our entire executive branch is a very compromised system from how information flows up and how it flows down, from how decisions and orders are made and carried out and from how  US servicemembers in harm’s way are forced to operate under vague, conflicting, confused rules of engagement.  This administration put a retired military officer flunkie as the State Department spokesman and removed trained military Public Affairs officers at the Pentagon, who were replaced by a civilian political flunkie.   Domestic partisan battles subsume national security.    This lax operational behavior permeates the Obama administration: John Brennan and Obama reviewing drone target lists in the White House, ISIS bombing targets subject to White House approval serve as two striking examples, but the day-to-day casual and reckless handling of information, decision-making process and relentless back and forth to thwart domestic partisan opponents creates a huge opportunity for foreign intelligence agencies to exploit this operational weakness.

The Republicans want to focus on Hillary Clinton, but with Benghazi and the stand-down order issue – if she gave it, did the President or someone in the White House tell her to, but why would she be giving an order to US commanders?  That is what confuses me in this administration – who the hell is in charge???  And then we can talk about Madame Secretary and her private email server, where she ran the State Department on an unsecured server, but the true scope of the unsecured email problem in this administration looms large and as yet unexposed.  We have the Lois Lerner and her numerous undisclosed personal email accounts, we have the US embassy in Japan email chaos, run by Caroline Kennedy, but assuredly among this administration, where no one seems to be attuned to sound information and operational security protocols, this information compromise likely goes much deeper and much higher.  This lax operational system, compounded by grave polluting of national strategy  by domestic partisan political battles,  took decades to reach this crisis point.  Our national security structure appears to be dangerously compromised.    How convoluted the inner-workings of the White House really are, remains unknown, but the glimpses of serous internal hemorrhaging keep leaking out.

Restoring integrity in the system is the only way to prevent a total bleed-out.  How we restore that integrity will be a looming question that goes far beyond the 2016 election, it goes to do we the American people want to restore our constitutional Republic?

1 Comment

Filed under American Character, Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

What if there was an opinion cascade about pet rocks?

“Availability cascade” is an academic term that basically has to do with manufacturing public opinion approval for a policy of some sort.  Any kind of policy at all.  In fact, think about how you might make an implausible idea seem plausible in public discourse, an idea no one ever even considered before.  Next, think about …

Source: What if there was an opinion cascade about pet rocks?

1 Comment

Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, The Media

America on its knees

President Obama delivered a rambling, disjointed final State of the Union address last night.  He warbled on about American values, bridging partisan divides, and more hopey changey blather, but he did not mention an international incident with Iran taking custody of 2 US Navy ships and detaining 10 US sailors.

Today, Secretary of State, John Kerry, bragged about kowtowing to Iranian officials and unbelievably he bragged about his smart diplomacy, where he lauds his handling this situation peacefully.  He actually thanked Iran for releasing our sailors.

If there are any people left in the Pentagon who aren’t political hacks, they assuredly must be furious about this administration bowing to Iran.  What really happened was not brilliant diplomacy, but a complete submission of the US to Iranian muscle-flexing.  The Obama administration has failed to respond to escalating provocations, emboldening Iran to engage in this latest stunt, knowing full well that the Obama administration would not respond forcefully.  Thanks to these clueless, wimpy, leftist nitwits in this administration, video of these American sailors, on their knees in submission, will now be broadcast all over the Mid-East.  So, the message Secretary Kerry is not brilliant diplomacy, it’s America’s military on its knees.

In the real world, far away from the neutered Obama administration, weakness is a potent provocation.   Safe to state – neither smart nor powerful!

12 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics

Ed Straker dissects Trump speak

Source: Donald Trump frequently tells crowds that he went to Wharton as a credential to prove that he is intelligent: “I went to the Wharton School of Business,” he noted several times. “I’m, like, a really smart person.” &quo…

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Politics

Don’t bet on justice in America

Late this past Thursday,  the State Department released more Clinton emails and as has been widely reported, the State Department failed to keep to the court ordered schedule for releasing these emails.

Aside from the Blumenthal email mentioned in my previous post, another email, where Hillary Clinton advises an aide to remove the heading from a document and send it nonsecure, has raised eyebrows.  CNN reports:

“On June 16, 2011, top Clinton aide Jake Sullivan wrote to Clinton to say she would get “tps” — presumably short for “talking points” that evening. The subject of the email is redacted so it’s not clear what topic these points covered.

The next morning, Clinton wrote back to say she hadn’t received them yet, and after a few minutes Sullivan responded that staff were having issues sending the document in a secure fax but that they were “working on it.”

“If they can’t,” Clinton replies, “turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.””

So Friday, the State Department issued a definitive statement that no such email was ever sent to Clinton:

The State Department can’t even get the Clinton emails released on the court-ordered schedule and dumped this latest batch, containing this red flag email, late Thursday and we’re supposed to believe that a thorough investigation of this email in question was done within hours on Friday???  With endless foot-dragging and excuses with coughing up these emails, the State Department sure is Johnny on the job with this internal investigation, where every statement they utter exonerates Clinton and her staff.

Watching this partisan poker game play out, from decades of watching the Clinton team, the odds remain strongly in their favor.   Sadly, some people in America really are above the law.  Americans allow some people to live by different rules, so don’t bet on justice when it comes to the Clintons.

1 Comment

Filed under General Interest, Politics, The Constitution

The drip drips continue

Despite the Clinton political machine and their loyal shills in the media trying to bury Hillary’s email server scandal the drip drips continue.  With her latest email dumps by the State Department the scandal deepens.  For an excellent analysis  please refer to John Schindler’s piece at the The New York Observer, “Hillary’s EmailGate Goes Nuclear” where he explains another explosive revelation, a Sid Blumenthal email with highly detailed information worthy of a top notch intelligence professional.  Schindler writes:

“In fact, the June 8, 2011 Blumenthal report doesn’t read like CIA material at all, in other words human intelligence or HUMINT, but very much like signals intelligence or SIGINT (for the differences see here). I know what SIGINT reports look like, because I used to write them for the National Security Agency, America’s biggest source of intelligence. SIGINT reports, which I’ve read thousands of, have a very distinct style and flavor to them and Blumenthal’s write-up matches it, right down to the “Source Comments,” which smack very much of NSA reporting and its “house rules.”

But is this an NSA assessment? If so, it would have to be classified at least Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information, a handling caveat that applies to most SIGINT, and quite possibly Top Secret/SCI, the highest normal classification we have. In that case, it was about as far from Unclassified as it’s possible for an email to be.”

Schindler offers some of the finest analysis of Hillary’s email server scandal and you can read his archived articles at his XX Committee blog.

A point that needs to be made is so far the State Department releases of the emails, which Hillary’s lawyers turned over to the State Department, reveal over a 1,000 emails to date, which contained classified information.   Keep in mind that the FBI has access to the approximately 30,000 “personal” emails, which Hillary’s lawyer stated were erased.  We don’t know what those 30,000 “personal” emails contain.  One can safely assume it’s likely more than yoga schedules and wedding plans.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics

Blue cheese still stinks

As a child my mother taught us to eat whatever was served when we were guests and to never utter a word of complaint.  I vividly recall eating dinner at a friend’s home, where there were 8 children in that family.   Her father dished out the food from the head of the table and they passed the plates around to each child.  Everyone got the same thing.   On this particular night, her mother had made spaghetti and there was a large bowl of tossed salad, from which her father dished out salad and poured on blue cheese salad dressing, then he dished out spaghetti  right next to the salad.  I had never eaten blue cheese salad dressing and the first bite startled me and made me want to spit it out,  but of course I couldn’t do that, so I swallowed it.  Her mother asked me if everything was okay and I said, “Yes, everything is very good.”  Then I focused my attention on eating every bite of that salad and the spaghetti, without giving any indication that all I wanted to do was barf.

That’s the kind of focus it takes to swallow the blue cheese dressing on the tossed salad of PC lies about Islamic terrorist attacks in America.   The reporting of the attack on a Philadelphia police officer by a 30 year-old black man had the mayor of Philadelphia declaring there was no Islam to see with this attack, yet the Philadelphia police commissioner stated that the shooter said he had declared allegiance to ISIS and shot the police officer to defend Islam.  Clearly the shooter expressed a religious belief in his actions.

As the afternoon wore on, some politicians and some in the PC media insisted the shooter was nuts, after all the shooter’s mother had told them that her son had been hearing voices and  had mental health issues.   The mother also reported that her son had become a very devout Muslim.

Are being mentally-ill and being a radical Islamic terrorist mutually exclusive conditions?

The shooter reportedly used a stolen gun.   From whom did he get that gun?

The shooter was reportedly a known felon who turned to Islam in prison.  Might we inquire if the shooter belonged to a black Muslim prison gang or who his spiritual advisers were in prison?  Or is that too inflammatory to ask?  Did he attend a mosque?

Late in the evening several TV news reports said the FBI is checking into whether the shooter had traveled to Saudi Arabia.  If that turns out to be true, might we inquire where he came up with the money for such a trip?

President Obama always quick to jump into racial dramas where he can cast the police as acting stupidly remained silent on the white Philadelphia police officer shot in cold blood by a young black, self-proclaimed Muslim man, who stated he had pledged allegiance to ISIS.   Did I miss the President taking to the air to condemn this terrorist attack on American soil?

Here’s a rundown on the story:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/man-accused-shooting-philly-cop-confessed-committing-act/story?id=36169588

Look, here’s a clue – the black community has it’s own radical Islam problem.  Much of it percolates from within the US prison system, where foreign money and Islamic prison gangs convert many young black men to Islam.  Outside of the prisons many black gangs and groups recruit, agitate and incite crimes and promote radical Islamic ideology.  Clue, they were there in Ferguson and Baltimore, but some hide under benign names like National President of  Black Lawyers for Justice .  And some of that blue cheese comes straight from the White House.  The Islamic/black gang/ black grievance industry nexus needs to be thoroughly investigated.  I’ve written about this before: here, here, here.

Blue cheese still stinks,  but I think I could choke that down better than these pathetic politicians trying to cover-up the truth.

Added thought:  After a look into the Islamic/black gang/ black grievance industry nexus, perhaps it’s time to look into decades of Arab money directed toward American black colleges and black college students too.   Perhaps, President Obama can offer some insights into this topic…

2 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, Islam, Politics, Terrorism