Category Archives: Politics
“The Left and the Distortion of History”, by John L. Hancock at The American Thinker
Filed under Culture Wars, Education, General Interest, History, Politics
Fallout from Somalia still haunts US policy 20 years later – News – Stripes
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, Terrorism
Jihadist training camps proliferate in Iraq and Syria – The Long War Journal
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics, Terrorism
“A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma” (the Obama war plan)
The war against ISIL/ISIS/IS continues to muddle along. So, it looks like the Obama administration decided to put more effort into helping the Kurds fight for Kobani, whilst ISIL/ISIS/IS decided to strike on towards Baghdad. We like our fights broken down into good guys vs bad guys, but in that region of the world, a lot fall into the bad guy group, very few into the good guy group, and a disconcerting number switch sides, hold dual loyalties, or can easily be bought, making choosing sides decidedly difficult. Turkey finally agreed to allow aid for the Kurds at Kobani to flow through Turkey. However, now the Syrian Kurds are angry about that. Jamie Dettmer at Global Security.org reports:
“Syrian Kurdish leaders are pushing back on Turkey’s
plan to allow Kurdish Peshmerga forces from northern Iraq to transit Turkish territory and to enter the besieged Syrian border town of Kobani to help in its defense.”
“Mideast politics is notoriously complex and among the most Byzantine involves the Kurdish political parties who vie for top-dog status and compete for the loyalty of all Kurds across Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran.”
The Obama administration charged into this war as clueless about the realities on the ground as they consistently demonstrated with their “prescient analysis” (that’s a joke) of the Arab Spring and choosing winners and losers there. We now are arming US designated terrorists in Kobani to fight the ISIL/ISIS/IS terrorists. We are still searching for elusive “Syrian moderates” from which to build a paramilitary force to be the “boots on the ground” in Syria to fight ISIL/ISIS/IS, an endeavor which US Central Command commander, Lloyd Austin says will take time. From McClatchyDC, “U.S. general: ‘It’ll take time’ to train new Syria force, reclaim Iraq turf, defeat Islamic State”:
“U.S. officials have said the United States is only at the very beginning of creating a new Syrian paramilitary, which will be handpicked from the country’s hodgepodge of rebel forces whose first concern isn’t the Islamic State but their long struggle to overthrow the government of President Bashar Assad.Austin certainly didn’t raise hopes about the prospects of a streamlined Syrian ground partner emerging anytime soon; at one point he referred to the goal as “hopefully, a force that we can train in Syria.”
The message couched in Austin’s remarks was clear: The existing Syrian rebel structure is untenable and the United States aims to build its own Syrian proxy – only this time, enemy No. 1 is the Islamic State instead of Assad. It remains unclear how many Syrian rebels would sign up on those terms. It’s even less clear how many of the current rebels the United States is courting, given their repeated battlefield coordination with the local al Qaida affiliate and other jihadists.”
To highlight the bizarre meanderings of Obama’s war plan, we are fighting ISIL/ISIS/IS in Iraq and Syria, while hoping to coax (bribe) some Syrian rebel groups to help us, even though they and ISIL/ISIS/IS are Sunnis and mutually see Assad as their #1 enemy. Any ground we force ISIL to cede in Syria, Assad is the only one with forces prepared to take advantage of, so our air strikes will, in reality, aid Assad. In Iraq, we are arming Kurdish fighters in Kobani who are members of an US designated terrorist entity – the PKK. In Baghdad, the weak government is relying on Iranian-backed Shiite militias – from this same McClatchyDC report:
“The weak Baghdad government is now forced into relying on Iranian-backed Shiite Muslim militias and untrained volunteers to fill the security vacuum. That’s led to an indirect U.S.-Iranian partnership against the Islamic State, translating into the U.S. military providing air cover for the same Shiite militiamen who not too many years ago were killing American soldiers.”
A news report yesterday stated that ISIL had launched mortar attacks against the US embassy in Baghdad, yet President Obama’s focus is on Kobani. We’re reliant on our small contingent of American “boots on the ground”, the Iraqi security forces who run away from ISIL and Iranian-backed militants if ISIL launches a multi-pronged attack on our embassy and/or Baghdad. Of course, I am sure that now that Valerie Jarrett is back on the job, recovering from back surgery, President Obama and the girls at the WH will make stupendous military decisions……. Childhood memories of the fall of Saigon popped into my mind, along with teenage memories of the Iranian hostage situation, followed by adult memories of my total disgust and anger at watching the Clinton presidential policy disgrace at Mogadishu. Now, we have this slow-motion disaster unfolding and where is the press at figuring out the big picture strategic disaster looming ahead???
The Last Refuge blog ran a post titled, “Lavrov’s Paradox”, highlighting that if you’re confused with who we’re arming in Obama’s war, you’re not alone. Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, described it as follows from a CNS report, “Russian FM: We and the US Are Arming Opposing Sides in Syrian Conflict”:
“Meanwhile the U.S.-led coalition was both bombing Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL) terrorists and providing armed support “to the opposition forces fighting the Bashar Assad regime alongside the Islamic State,” he said.
“The U.S. considers this support ‘moderate’ and therefore acceptable,” Lavrov continued. “Its purpose is to help the Syrian opposition achieve the potential to overthrow the current regime in Syria. The controversial and paradoxical nature of these actions is obvious, in my view. We have been discussing this with our U.S. counterparts, trying to understand their logic, but have not received any clear explanations so far.””
Don’t worry, surely, “I voted for the $87 billion, before I voted against it” Kerry will untangle this Gordian knot of a strategy…… And President Obama with his girls at the WH will compose a winning narrative…. Too bad real American servicemembers will pay the price for the looming, inevitable failure, while the leader from behind plays golf. Meanwhile, Lavrov and Putin will continue to ponder the American paradox and bizarre detour from geopolitical realities, like trying to define Obama’s understanding of American national interests. And to think, the West used to find the Russians perplexing:
“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.” – Winston Churchill (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/a_riddle_wrapped_up_in_an_enigma)
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Military, Politics, Uncategorized
“Ebola and the Centers for Dissimulation and Confusion” from The American Thinker
Filed under Ebola, General Interest, Politics
Ebola’s spread and Islamic burial rituals – The American Thinker
Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Islam, Politics
Is Foggy Bottom working with terrorists to fight ISIL?
The other day I wrote about Kobani and some concerns (questions) I had about the Kurds fighting there and serendipitously Nightwatch for October16, 2014 contains some fascinating information about this very thing:
“Syria: Syrian Kurdish sources claimed that the Kurds with US air support have driven ISIL forces from Kobani. They claim that ISIL is only holding a few neighborhoods. The US defense spokesman said the situation is fluid, but confirmed a significant increase in air attacks against ISIL forces in and near Kobani in the past two days.
–
An al Jazeera article reported that the so-called heroes of the fighting are not the Kurdish peshmera militia, but the hardened fighters of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which the US and NATO have identified as a terrorist organization. The US State Department today confirmed it held a weekend meeting with Syrian Kurdish envoys affiliated with the PKK.
Comment: The ironies of the fight for Kobani continue to mount in that the US air operations are supporting an organization that the US has designated a terrorist organization. That is the only group capable of standing up to ISIL’s fighters. US contact with affiliates of the PKK almost guarantees that Turkey will provide little help in the fight against ISIL.
As for ISIL, the fight for Kobani has not ended because it must take Kobani to secure its northern border.”
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military, Politics
Scary thoughts
Andrew Thomas posed some scary scenarios in his latest piece at The American Thinker “Ebola, Islamists, and Executive Orders”
Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, Politics
America at another crossroads
Gladius forwarded an important Thomas Sowell column, “Local or National Elections?”, which explains the stakes of this year’s battle over control of the Senate. Dr. Sowell, in his inimitable style, reminds us that while Tip O’Neill popularized the “all politics is local” phrase, on some elections in Washington the very course of America’s future rests. In clear, simple terms he explains:
“In 1860, some abolitionists split the anti-slavery vote by running their own candidate — who had no chance of winning — instead of supporting Abraham Lincoln, who was not pure enough for some abolitionists. Lincoln got just 40 percent of the vote, though that turned out to be enough to win in a crowded field.
But what a gamble with the fate of millions of human beings held as slaves! And for what? Symbolic political purity?
This year as well, there are third-party candidates complicating elections that can decide the fate of this nation for years to come. No candidate that irresponsible deserves any vote. With all the cross-currents of political controversies raging today, what is the overriding national issue that makes this year’s Congressional elections so crucial?
That issue is whether, despite all the lawless edicts of President Obama, threatening one-man rule, we can still salvage enough of the Constitution to remain a free, democratic nation.”
Recently, Gwyneth Paltrow, obviously not well-versed on the arguments in “The Federalist Papers”, made headlines extolling President Obama’s brand of lawlessness, stating:
“It would be wonderful if we are able to give this man all the power he needs to accomplish the things he needs to,” Ms. Paltrow said.
The same mindless drivel permeates America, with citizens completely uneducated about The Constitution, American history and more importantly our foundational principles. In country music small remnants of American ideals still linger and Paltrow’s comments brought to mind the lyrics from an old Aaron Tippin song, “You’ve Got To Stand For Something”: “You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything!” What Paltrow is preening about is giving one man unchecked power. In her isolated, elitist celebrity bubble, she rubs elbows with movers and shakers of the American political left, but one can only wonder if she has ever read “The Constitution of the United States”.
My friend, Minta, expressed the erosion of American ideals based on our founding principles, in our latest email exchange:
“I think we need to think about two different countries, one called the United States and the other called America. Most people in our country no longer live in America, just the States. It’s a useful way to view it. They can absolutely be un-American, because America is an idea set onto a real country. If that country loses the idea—the ideas and ideals—America will cease to be. This is the fight we are waging: to keep the United States being America too.”
In lieu of fabricated narratives, lame hash-tag campaigns and repeating hollow slogans, it’s time for Americans to do some independent research away from political ideologues on either side of the political aisle. Dr. Sowell feels this election is imperative to check the tide of lawlessness (yes, even some liberal law professors have spoken out against President Obama’s brand of “I’ve got a pen and a phone” governance by executive decree) and I hope a Republican majority can check executive hubris, but our problems, while magnified by high-profile attention to Washington, stem from a lazy, uneducated citizenry, bereft of even a morsel of dedication to civic duty. More than half the country receives some form of hand-outs from Washington, content to believe in what is owed to them rather than what they owe America. We have become a nation of mindless followers and one election, albeit a crucially important one, won’t change America, until, “we the people” can sit down at the dinner table as one nation, united by our American ideals.
President Lincoln, attempting to unite a divided America at the close of the US Civil War, left us with these immortal words:
“It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion – that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain – that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
His words remain important, but even more important is how a man from humble origins became one of the most pivotal presidents in American history. “The Eloquent President”, by Ronald C. White, Jr., takes you on a journey of understanding Lincoln through his words and as one of our most gifted writers and orators to ever hold the office of President, plenty of material exists. Lincoln didn’t have access to public libraries or the internet; what he had was the intestinal fortitude to pick himself up and work hard to improve himself. He refused to believe in “insurmountable obstacles” (yes, that ever-recurring LB theme – “faith to move mountains” and a willingness to work hard). A little story from Lincoln’s youth explains how this backwoods lawyer found the words to pen the Gettysburg Address. White writes:
“When Lincoln moved to New Salem he made the decision to master the English language by an intense study of grammar. While living in New Salem, Lincoln heard that a farmer, John Vance, owned a copy of Samuel Kirkham’s English Grammar. Lincoln walked six miles to get it. He was twenty-three years old.” (pages 102-103)
No one handed President Lincoln a free ride to an Ivy league school and likewise Dr. Sowell’s personal biography demonstrates that with hard work anyone can succeed. Lincoln walked six miles to track down a book he thought held the key to improving his grammar; Dr. Sowell, a poor black man from Harlem, worked hard to acquire an education in the 1950s, long before the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964.
A few years ago I wrote a piece, “The Quest For American Leadership In The 21st Century: A Few Home Truths” and I still think my three-step plan is worth considering:
“The quest for our 21st century American leaders starts with you. Step One: Think for yourself; move away from being swayed by political partisans hurling talking points at you. Take the time to study issues, candidates and find your own moral compass. President George Washington, my favorite founding father, wrote a list titled, Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior In Company and Conversation”, 110 rules covering everything from admonitions not to clean your teeth with the tablecloth to don’t run in the streets. He ended with #110: “Labour to keep alive in your breast that Little Spark of Celestial Fire Called Conscience.” That should be your guide.
Step Two: Be the leader of your own destiny. Don’t be a follower of populist movements. left or right, unless you have completed Step One. Before becoming a political lemming, allowing professional media figures to press your political hot buttons, calmly discuss issues with family and friends. In our 24 hour news cycle, internet-connected world, misinformation, disinformation and outright lies can circle the globe in minutes. Don’t let these control your political reasoning, refer back to Step Two.
Step Three: Follow the rules. President Lincoln’s call for reverence for the laws provides the keystone to rebuilding a stronger America. When political aspirants lack personal integrity, obfuscate on public issues, or find excuses for not following the rules; move on and continue your quest for worthy leaders. To honor those who sacrificed all, to secure our blessings of liberty, at the very least we all have a duty to become informed citizens, who demand men and women of character to lead us in this century.”
