Psst, I found this blog post, “Victoria Nuland and Ukraine” , by Steve Sailer, written in an even more contemptuous tone than even I could manage, on all these crazy family connections. I have to bookmark his blog and read some more.
Category Archives: General Interest
Connecting a few dots
“The political divide in Ukraine has deep historical roots and can’t be wholly blamed on Putin’s interference. Many Ukrainians, mostly in the eastern part of the country, feel an affinity for Russia, while others long for integration with Western Europe. Ultimately, Ukrainians will have to resolve their political identity crisis themselves, but other nations, including the U.S., can play a constructive role in defusing the current conflict and holding the Ukrainian government to international standards of civil conduct. That requires diplomacy that is deft as well as determined.”
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/02/21/218952/ukraine-must-not-become-a-front.html#storylink=cpy
The above quote is from an opinion piece at www.mcclatchydc.com, which came from the LA Times on Friday. Lest we forget, President Obama places his trust in people like Victoria Nuland, of “F – the EU” fame, to manage delicate diplomatic issues, like this Ukraine crisis. Considering Nuland’s leaked phone conversation displays her complete contempt for our European allies, it seems very unlikely that the US has a leg to stand on in this unfolding crisis. Angela Merkel and many other of our EU allies would be more likely to listen to Vladimir Putin than they would listen to President Obama. So, we’ve got the diplomat, who brushed off criticism over her leaked phone call (about Ukraine’s situation btw) by asserting she is the most “undiplomatic diplomat”, trying to handle a crisis in need of diplomacy “that is deft as well as determined” – not likely from this administration. Even more alarming is how this recording shows Nuland trying to dictate which opposition forces in the Ukraine should play a role in the government and which shouldn’t (good rundown of events here). So, the Obama administration’s girls at work strike out – again.
Here’s a little family round-up. Ms Nuland’s sister-in-law, Kimberly Kagan, started the Institute for the Study of War – oh remember them – they put forth Elizabeth O’Bagy, the faux expert on Syria. I reported on her in several posts. Just a short note that the photos of Ms O’Bagy in her other job as the political director for the Syrian Emergency Task Force were removed on their web page, but a real journalist, Bryan Preston, took pictures of that webpage on September 5, 2013(good thinking Bryan, and I learned something useful:-), Here’s my piece:
“Stumbling upon some facts in 5 minutes…….” – September 3, 2013
Here’s a piece I wrote on Ms. Nuland’s brother-in-law, Frederick Kagan, another geopolitical expert in the family :
“Better than none”…….the leading from behind refresher course – September 7,2013
Remember the Institute for the Study of War fired Ms O’Bagy and for those of you with short memory spans, here’s a reminder of who then hired Ms O’Bagy to work on his staff:
“John McCain staff requirement – just be a liar” – September 27, 2013
Certainly, Ms Nuland has nothing to do with Ms. O’Bagy (at least I hope not), but lest I remind you the map Ms O’Bagy presented on the Syria resistance was accepted, without question, by the movers and shakers in Washington and it sure looked like even John Kerry was using that map. Here’s another odd connection, between the State Department and Ms O’Bagy, another report, “State Department funds O’Bagy’s Pro-Rebel Lobbying”. Yikes, Ms O’Bagy sure hobnobs with the movers and shakers in Washington, for a young university grad…. Heck, she flew to prominence almost as quickly as Sandra Fluke and on about as many intellectual feathers. Oh my, at this point what difference does it make (oh no, I’m channeling that other foreign policy guru now, stop libertybelle, just stop). Back to being serious, Ms O’Bagy was presented to the world by the mainstream media as the expert on Syria (again, without question).
So, now we have Ms O’Bagy working on John McCain’s staff and she sure gets around – she had even signed an affidavit asserting that Eric Harroun, an American of Arab descent, who traveled to Syria to fight with Al-Qaeda connected terrorists, was not a terrorist. Debbie Schlussel wrote a good piece on this little amazing incident,“OUTRAGE: Jihadist Who Went Overseas to Help Terrorists Wage Jihad Gets $100 Fine, Probation”
Hummm, this Harroun case was in, wait, don’t hold your breath, Arizona, home of John McCain. That’s odd and Ms O’Bagy , whose stated topic for her Georgetown thesis by the way was “female militancy” (I could not invent this crazy crap, really I couldn’t) provided a sworn affidavit for Harroun. Ok, nothing odd there libertybelle, just walk away… Then recently, February 13,2014, “John McCain tweets horrific Syria pictures” , where he’s still pushing for the US to help the rebels in Syria (wonder who provided him these photos btw). Fast forward and here he goes again as the Republican voice on the crisis in Ukraine: “John McCain slams Obama on Ukraine: “Most naive President in history”. Now, isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black, we have total dupes and nitwits running our foreign policy into the ground, heck, make that running our country into the ground. Oh, my googling Ms O’Bagy started out , because, Bailey O’Bagy (another of her aliases when she was on the Egyptian women’s soccer team.) reminded me of another young woman who managed to make some pretty high connections….. Monica Lewinsky, lol.
Such is the level of American foreign policy and our geopolitical experts….
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics
An outsider look at Ukraine
Over the past several days the airwaves have been filled with loud demands that we do more to support the Ukrainian protestors (frequently dubbed a struggle for freedom against the evil Russians). This reaction comes quite natural to America, with our long Cold War history, but I have some questions about the situation that I haven’t found clear answers to yet.
First, let me say I am weary of the American media latching onto these international crises and presenting everything as a “fight for freedom”, without providing much in the way of historical background information. It’s very easy to jump onto foreign causes when they are presented as “struggles against Russian oppression” or “fighting against tyranny”, but truthfully the internal politics in these areas usually are fraught with corruption with a capital C, excesses of violence, abuses of power, and long-held ethnic animosity. The situation in the Ukraine is no different. You can go read about the Holodomor, where the Soviets starved millions of Ukrainians to death, to get a taste of the animosity that still ripples below the surface among many ethnic Ukrainians.
In this latest violence, it sure looks like the protestors are the ones who have been on a torching buildings spree in Kiev, not the government. Not sure how I would feel if protestors in America started setting buildings ablaze, because those 1-percenters with their destruction of other people’s property sure angered me – urinating and defecating anywhere like animals… Why does no one in the West tell the protestors to quit torching Kiev, yet all you hear about are how the police need to calm down? I am not condoning police or military forces shooting unarmed civilians, I’m merely asking why our reporting always champions protestors, even when the protestors are setting a city aflame?
The CIA Factbook offers these statistics as to the demographic make-up of present-day Ukraine: “Ukrainian 77.8%, Russian 17.3%, Belarusian 0.6%, Moldovan 0.5%, Crimean Tatar 0.5%, Bulgarian 0.4%, Hungarian 0.3%, Romanian 0.3%, Polish 0.3%, Jewish 0.2%, other 1.8% (2001 census)” As to the 2010 Ukrainian presidential election, irregularities ran rife, as usual. International monitors gave varying accounts. A report by a group of monitors which included Russia, Poland, France, Armenia, Kyrgyzistan and Belarus (Centre for Monitoring Democratic Processes) offered their verdict here. A Christian Science Monitor explanation of the election can be found here. Yanukovich won with a less than 50% of the vote, but it seems like he had a good bit of ethnic Ukrainian support or the ethnic Ukrainians didn’t turn out in sizable enough numbers given this huge ethnic Ukrainian numerical advantage. Here’s a NY Times report on the 2010 election, replete with plenty of criticisms – (NY Times story here). Any theories, facts or information on this numerical question, anyone?
Now, as in all these other hotspots, American politicians like to get on their soapbox and berate the evil Putin for his undo influence in other countries political affairs and in the Ukraine this charge accompanies almost every report in this latest flare-up. What you don’t hear much about is how American political groups get actively involved in actually managing campaigns (paid political consultants) in many foreign elections – from Israel to the Palestinian Authority to Iraq to Afghanistan to the Ukraine, and so it goes. Here’s a link to which American political consultants were hired to work for the respective Ukrainian candidates in the 2010 presidential election in the Ukraine. Now, what this means is American politicians and their cronies pick sides in many foreign elections, their consultants make big bucks organizing campaigns in foreign countries and our “American” foreign policy ends up being as divided as our internal politics due to this partisan-charged environment. None of the folks in Washington will step back from their partisan talking points and spoon-fed politicized dogma to actually think about America, in the big picture sense – as one country, needing one voice abroad, to promote our national interests. We can’t even agree on what our own national interests are, yet here we go again trying to jump into other countries internal affairs – half-cocked. Naturally, John McCain is at the forefront. Our politicians are just as much trying to influence internal affairs in the Ukraine as the Russians are – let’s at least be honest about that.
And let’s look at the Obama administration flip-flops dealing with foreign hotspots – completely incoherent. Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel – totally embarrassing and colossal failures. In Syria, Madame Secretary Clinton proclaimed Assad a “reformer”, President Obama declared red lines, and in the end John Kerry and President Obama handed over control of the situation to Putin. CNN reported: “U.S. talks tough, but options limited in Ukraine”, indicating that even at CNN the real world seems to be crashing through their idolization of President Obama as more hype than actual “change you can believe in”.
Before Americans get too fired up by the likes of John McCain with his denunciations of Putin (here’s a pretty typical rant of his), be fully aware that a financial crisis precipitated this latest Ukrainian unrest, when Yanukovich went with a Russian bail-out offer rather than a lesser European offer. Here’s a quick background on the real source of Ukraine’s continual corruption problem within it’s natural gas and energy industries: “Ukraine’s $19-billion question of debt and corruption”. So, while McCain is bellowing about sanctions against the Yanukovich government, be aware that what’s really going to be asked of us, to secure a European-leaning Ukraine, is a huge bail-out for the Ukraine, which is ranked 144th by Transparency International on corruption – tying with countries like the Central African Republic and Iran and scoring worse than Uganda. The Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe. If you still feel dismayed at Obama’s bailouts and haven’t had any satisfactory answers as to where all that money went, imagine tossing money into this Ukrainian gambit?
Finally, the Russians have a legitimate interest in the Ukraine based on centuries of ties. The Russians have based their Black Sea fleet at Sevastopol since the time of Catherine the Great, so it’s not like they just decided to meddle in the Ukraine on a whim. NATO has pushed toward integrating the Ukraine and Georgia into it’s sphere and there are many Ukrainians who would welcome aligning with Europe. There are also many ethnic Russians in the Ukraine who want a closer Russian alliance. The Russians brokered a deal with Yanukovich in 2010, extending the lease for the Black Sea Fleet for 25 years (story here), putting a kibosh on the NATO dream. As I stated in a post the other day, in real terms, the Russian national security framework shattered with the collapse of the Soviet Union and if you’re Putin standing in Moscow today, his European adversaries are a thousand miles closer – with no natural geographic roadblocks. Unlike President Obama, I am confident that Vladimir Putin understands military strategy, geopolitics and has a keen grasp of map-reading (remember O and his 57 states…), so in clear strategic terms, Putin’s moves make perfect sense, while our meandering posturing creates more chaos and international instability. I’m not for or against either side in the Ukraine. As an outsider, I’m just trying to make sense out of the chaos and understand what the respective sides are demanding and demolishing.
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, History, Military, Politics
The Obama Network……coming soon
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Byron York continues unraveling the FCC pilot program to monitor (my word choice there) newsrooms across America – “New Obama Initiative tramples First Amendment protections”. After whining for decades about Rush Limbaugh and the evils of right-wing talk radio followed by Gore and other liberals failed attempts to compete in the free market, we have this latest reincarnation of the Fairness Doctrine. Yes, here they come again with another brazen attempt to silence their political opposition and indoctrinate the American people. We’re now supposed to let partisan hacks and left-wing academics police newsrooms around the country to ensure compliance with providing “critical information” (whatever partisan gruel they’re serving). The FCC pilot program is slated to run in SC, home of long-time Democratic Congressman, James Clyburn (famous for rants accusing Tea Party protestors of spitting and using racial slurs – despite no audio ever surfacing to back that – even though reporters were swarming all about and everyone these days has a cell phone at the ready). And why SC, well, because Clyburn’s daughter, Mignon Clyburn, a Obama appointee to the FCC, threw her (and her Daddy’s) political muscle into pushing this latest attempt to muzzle the free press in America (her comments here). Not to worry though – the program is “voluntary”, which means, I am sure , that all those who don’t comply will be publicly named and nudged into line.
Wikipedia on the Fairness Doctrine
Breitbart reported on this new FCC program back in November 2013
Filed under Culture Wars, Education, General Interest, Politics
Just links
The lack of character and ethical void in the US military: good piece, “A Military that Looks like America”, at the In From the Cold blog.
An older link to a piece in the Strategic Studies, circa 2012, on the lack of clear ethical standards in the US Army: Finding “The Right Way”: Toward An Army Institutional Ethic, written by LTC Clark C. Barrett. This paper offers a history of the Army’s character-building efforts, pitfalls with a written code, along with remedies to those pitfalls. The missing fact in his paper is that when you start with substandard ingredients (lack of character in civilian society= a character deficit in the recruit pool too), it takes a whole lot of extra-effort to create spectacular dishes.
And you thought the Fairness Doctrine was dead, with the coffin nailed down tight, oops, it’s risen from the dead: from the WSJ, “The FCC Wades Into the Newsroom”.
A NASCAR war on women charge (alternately referred to as Danica Patrick’s driving record sucks). Richard Petty dared to state the obvious truth: “Tony Stewart picks the wrong person to get petty with over Danica Patrick”. Small town stock car racing is better (trust me it is) than NASCAR and Danica’s already not excelled at Indy racing and now moved to NASCAR, so after this she can go join Sandra Fluke and claim the evil male patriarchy conspired against her. She has gotten more attention, both press and endorsements, all because of her photogenic looks, while better male drivers struggle to make it in NASCAR.
Filed under Culture Wars, General Interest, Military, The Media
Ukraine Unrest
Our media likes to run with stories offering one-sided, very poorly researched reporting on many foreign events and the Ukraine is another in a long line. First, let’s realize the Cold War era is over and a new, shifting geopolitical map exists. George Friedman describes this best:
When the Soviet Union collapsed, its western frontier moved east nearly a thousand miles, from the West German border to the Russian border with Belarus. From the Hindu Kush its border moved northward a thousand miles to the Russian border with Kazakhstan. Russia was pushed from the border of Turkey northward to the northern Caucasus, where it is still struggling to keep its foothold in the region. Russian power has now retreated farther east than it has been in centuries. During the Cold War it had moved farther west than ever before. In the coming decades, Russian power will settle somewhere between those two lines.
– Friedman, George (2010-01-18). The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century (p. 70). Allison & Busby. Kindle Edition.
To understand this in geopolitical terms, Moscow now sits with the west poised almost a thousand miles closer to Moscow. That, combined with the dramatic loss of control over large swaths of the former USSR, makes it imperative for Russia to try and exert influence in its neighboring countries. Of course, Putin wants to regain Russian standing in the world, so we see him in the Middle East, working on Sino-Soviet cooperation, trying to turn Sochi into a Russian PR win, and even moving in Central America. At least this is my take on matters.
Stratfor, George Friedman’s excellent global intelligence site, offered a very good analysis of the history and background to the latest uprising in the Ukraine: “Protestors in Lviv Raise the Stakes in Ukraine’s Crisis”, which will help make sense out of the fever-pitched reporting on TV.
Kforce Government Solutions, Inc. (KGS) offers a free analysis of open source information that provides excellent background to events around the world (thanks JK for that link a while back). Their report is called Nightwatch and the report for 2/19 offers some excellent information to help make sense of the Ukrainian protests.
To hear President Obama’s mundane commentary on the Ukraine, check out Politico’s, “President Obama: Russia disputes not ‘some Cold War chessboard'” (*yawn*). Don’t expect any clear geopolitical explanations from this story – same old, same old and who knows next week he may have a different foreign policy take on the Ukraine. Afterall, his foreign policy guru is on record as saying, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion, before I voted against it.” Yep, they’ve got to remain flexible…
Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, The Media
Through a smudged looking glass
If you want a glimpse of the surreal, read what foreigners think about America in Watching America, a website that presents unique foreign perspectives. Prepare yourself to be perplexed by the views presented. If you click on their heading “Foreign News Sources”, they do offer a nifty listing on many foreign news sources and whether the site is in English, so that’s one small positive thing I can say about this site, which claims:
“It is not our purpose to find favorable or unfavorable content, but to reflect as accurately as possible how others perceive the richest and most powerful country in the world. We have no political agenda.”
You can laugh at that huge detour from the truth, I did 🙂
Filed under General Interest, Politics, The Media
The most amazing Superbowl ad
Or at least I found it amazing, as in beyond description – the heavy metal music, the visuals, the storyline – all over the top… even Time wrote about this ad.
Filed under General Interest
Trey
In early December I began this post, then hesitated, thinking what could I possibly add of value to address a topic, which multitudes of experts from academia, to philanthropic agencies, to churches on to public officials consider a problem too big to solve. So, today being brave of heart, here’s an attempt to talk about homelessness in America, another one of those “insurmountable obstacles” in our land of plenty…… yes, especially plenty of excuses.
We all know how these heart-wrenching stories go about homelessness, written to pull at our heartstrings by focusing on children, of course. In December 2013 the New York Times ran a lengthy piece, replete with lots of photos and even a few videos of a young black girl in New York City’s shelter system titled, “Invisible Child, Girl in the Shadows: Dasani’s Homeless Life”. This 12-year-old girl, Dasani, lives in a squalid room with her stepfather, mother and six siblings in one of the worst shelters in the city.
The reporter, Andrea Elliot, began interviewing this girl and her family in 2012 and while she presents this family’s plight with an overabundance of empathy, she veers off into blaming political and economic forces as the cause for this little girl’s plight, when clearly having two drug addicts for parents would be the place to start heaping the blame. Ms. Elliot treats the drug addicted parents to heaping doses of understanding, instead of stating the obvious – they’re unfit parents. These poor children will have little hope if they remain in the care of two addicts, who can’t even take care of themselves, let alone 7 children. Okay, call me a cold-hearted, judgmental, racist white lady, but thems the facts folks. Certainly, read the piece, because it’s truly worth reading and if you can bear with me for a few more paragraphs, I’ll revisit Dasani’s life in more detail.
Also, in December 2013, Kevin D. Williamson, National Review’s roving reporter, wrote a piece about intractable poverty in “white” America titled, “The White Ghetto”. Williamson wrote his piece from a keen tourist perspective – no children as political props to be found in his piece, where he travels to Kentucky, the heart of Appalachia and describes what he finds, “If the people here weren’t 98.5 percent white, we’d call it a reservation.” Williamson wades through the history, demographic realities, economic travails and along the way debunks many of our preconceived notions about our social ills. Williamson is a superb writer, so please read the piece, despite my less than spectacular description of his work.
Now, I’ll tell you a story about a homeless young black man I met at the end of last summer. One bright, late summer morning when I arrived at work, some fellow workers from the lawn and garden department told me they had found a boy sleeping on one of the porch swing displays on the patio when they got to work. Now being a store that is open 24/7, customers come and go at all times of the day and night.
Most irritating to me have been the customers who come in during the wee hours of the morning, dragging along small children, who should be at home, sleeping in their own beds. Thankfully, I only work overnight rarely for major resets of shelves, so I bite my tongue during these encounters, because without fail, these poor tykes are crying or screaming, while the clueless parents meander along, oblivious to their offspring’s misery. Some ignore the cacophony, others add to it by screaming at the poor kids. Finding a homeless boy, well, this was something new, like a scene out of that Billie Letts novel, “Where The Heart Is”, about a pregnant young woman living in a Wal-mart in a small Oklahoma town.
I walked out to the patio, where this boy was still sound asleep on the green porch swing, with his small backpack beside him. He opened his eyes when I approached, furtive and tense. So, I asked him what his name is and he mumbled, “Trey.” Being a curious sort, I started talking to him and asking him questions. He told me he was 18, but I think he told a fellow employee he was 19, not that it matters much – he was past the age where getting help is easy, as you’ll see.
His story was that he lived with his uncle in a nearby tiny town and his uncle decided to leave and go drive trucks for a living. He said he was on his own now and had nowhere to live, no family to help him. I referred him to a private charity here that offers food assistance and I also gave him cash to be able to eat for a few days, because when I asked him when was the last time he ate, he hesitatingly told me, “yesterday.” I didn’t know if that was true, because this poor kid looked awfully thin. And I gave him my name and phone number. Now, when I asked him what his plans were, naturally his were totally unrealistic, given his circumstances. He was dirty, has no home and he told me he would like to find a job. No employer is going to hire some dirty, homeless kid, with no means to get to work and no means to come to work clean and presentable.
I called that private charity and the lady told me to send him to them and they have referrals to help and she advised me not to give him cash, because cash might be used for drugs, alcohol, etc. Over the intervening months, I saw Trey occasionally in the store and I gave him money for food a few times too. Each time I talked to him, I urged him to go to various places where he might get help. I told him to go to the police. He told me he went to them. He said he went downtown and was given a motel room for a month under some program for the homeless, but his time was up there and now he is on a waiting list for housing. He said there’s a shortage of housing, so he’s back to being without a place to stay.
I urged Trey to try some churches, because for a small town, we’ve got four pages of churches listed in the yellow pages and probably dozens more that aren’t listed. You can’t go a quarter-mile here without running into several churches – we’ve got loads of “white” churches, loads of “black” churches, loads of “mixed demographics” churches and due to a large Korean population, we even have a lot of “Korean” churches too. With so much Christian zeal around, you’d think finding a helping hand would be easy and you’d think we wouldn’t have homeless kids wandering around. He told me he stopped in one church and they told him they can’t help him. Now, whether he really did seek help at all these places, I don’t know, but listening to him, it became obvious what he needed was an adult to take him by the hand and guide him. He doesn’t seem capable to find his way to being self-sufficient, in the socially acceptable sense, on his own. He mumbles, he avoids eye-contact, he seems to have some emotional or perhaps learning disabilities. During one conversation he told me he was expelled from school in the 9th grade, so he’s very limited with opportunities. He carries a notebook and seems to like to draw pictures though.
The week before Christmas, I saw Trey sitting in the shoe department sleeping one evening. The weather had gotten cold and he had on a coat, but was wearing the same shorts he had on when I first met him. I asked him how things were going and not much had changed, although he looked thinner and more desperate and he looked hopeless.
An elderly cashier asked me if he was okay and I gave her a bare bones summary of his plight. She insisted she would call her daughter, who works for the department of family and children’s services here. I told Trey I was getting off from work in a few minutes and then I would take him to the McDonald’s at the front of our store and get him something to eat. I told the elderly cashier that is where we would be. She met us at McDonald’s and her daughter gave the same referrals – the police, the private food charity, churches. She explained that her daughter said it’s really hard once kids turn 18, because there aren’t many options. She left and I sat down with Trey to eat our meal. I could see him withdraw as the elderly cashier repeated the same referrals that he had tried. He told me at one place they told him there’s a shelter in a city that’s not all that far away (but it’s too far to walk in the cold wearing shorts) and he doesn’t know anyone there, so he didn’t want to go there. He ate one of his burgers, but I knew he wanted to keep the other one for later. I gave him some more cash, but I had to get home to my husband, who is disabled and can’t be left too many hours unattended.
I had thought about bringing Trey home, but hesitated, because my husband is no position to defend himself, if I had misjudged this boy’s character. I sought advice. I asked a kind-hearted, black lady, who is an assistant manager at work, if she knows of any churches that might help. I asked a black department manager, whom I know is a lay pastor in his church. I emailed my friend, Gladius, who is always a reliable source for great advice. The kind black lady told me that black churches aren’t all that they should be and in her opinion mostly they want your money. The black lay pastor, agreed with that assessment, but he told me that he would ask around. Gladius advised me not to bring Trey to my home, because it’s too risky and he told me not to tell him where I live, because he might lead others, who are a threat to my home. I hadn’t even considered that. Gladius gave me a few more places to check into. And Gladius told me white churches aren’t all they should be. The lay pastor got back to me a week or so later and told me of a lady who runs some sort of small private place for the homeless, but he didn’t know much about it.
I didn’t see Trey for a while, but recently he returned and he avoids me. I assume he’s given up on anyone ever really helping him and one of the security guys in my store pointed him out to me as someone they are watching, because he’s shoplifting frequently now. It seems likely that Trey will become just one more statistic of a young black man making his way through the criminal justice system, but if I had been better at helping him, this could have been avoided. Sure, it’s easy to say, it’s not my problem, or that I did all that I could do, but the truth is he arrived in my town, with only the clothes on his back and I know he needs help. I keep thinking I should have done more to help him, because that’s what neighbors are supposed to do.
It’s easy to stereotype, based on our perceptions of various ethnic and racial cultural situations, but at the end of the day, Trey is a kid – he’s not a man by any stretch of the imagination. He doesn’t know how to find a way to a productive, happy fulfilling life on his own. And I wonder how well I would have fared if I found myself with no family or friends to turn to, hungry and alone with only the clothes on my back at 18 or 19 and coming from his type of home environment.
In the urban plight piece, the little girl, Dasani, has dedicated teachers and the principal of her school, mentoring her. She might make it, despite having unreliable parents (drug addicted parents are not reliable – sorry, they’re not).
In Williamson’s report from the “white ghetto”, it’s not out-of-wedlock births that’s the issue, it’s the cascading effect of scarce jobs, crushing generational poverty, drug and alcohol addiction and a litany of bad personal money-management skills that seem almost a genetic trait among America’s poor, which truly is the case among America’s poorest, regardless of race and ethnicity. A barrage of more government programs, replete with state of the art “referral capabilities” and federally subsidized hand-outs won’t change the culture that produces this sort of human misery and hopelessness.
Solutions start with people, not with more government intervention.
Local folks trying new ideas and more people offering a helping hand would surely provide many more needed ideas and potential solutions. I felt pretty useless with my first attempt at helping a homeless person, but I’m still thinking about ways to help Trey and I keep hoping that he doesn’t end up in jail.
At Christmas time I hesitantly mentioned Trey to my younger sister, fully expecting another of her oft-repeated lectures over the years, about how I need to quit adopting stray people and their problems and how I can’t save the world. This time she surprised me and told me that locally back home they’re trying to get a program going for kids like Trey, who reach adulthood and aren’t eligible for programs for children any longer. These kids still need a place to live and adult guidance to avoid becoming statistics of young people passing through the criminal justice system. Local efforts sure appeal to me more than federal behemoths that always come with endless mazes of red tape and multi-tiered bureaucratic hoops to jump through. None of this is helping Trey and I wish I had just brought him home, but I didn’t know enough about him to risk my husband’s safety.
Does one more kid falling through the cracks matter?
He should matter in America.
I wonder how much money is raised through private charities and allocated through government sources in America. I wonder how many homeless people there really are in America and then I wonder how much money per homeless person that all comes out to. While talking to the lay pastor at work, he asked an elderly black lady, whom we both know is very active in her church, if her church has a program for the homeless. She told me they do a walk every year to raise money for the homeless.
As with most things in America, I suspect the answer is that we’re good at raising money and awareness, but not so stellar at using that money and awareness to effectively reach those in need. What Trey needs is parents who care about his well-being and in lieu of that he needs some adults who care about him. Government programs don’t offer caring – they excel at referrals. And yes, I failed him too and I’m still worrying about him, especially when the temperatures dropped last week. What if he got sick – no one would even know.
Filed under Culture Wars, Food for Thought, General Interest, Politics
1740 book on Stonehenge available online
Harvard University Press released a digitized version of 1740 book on Stonehenge titled, Stonehenge, a temple restor’d to the British druids, written by William Stukeley, according to The Heritage Trust blog (a fascinating blog to check out btw).
Filed under General Interest, History