Today marks the opening of the brand new National Library for the Study of George Washington at Mount Vernon. The short video clip from the Washington Times explains that while the library is privately funded and appointments are necessary to access it, it’s mission will be a very public one. The library includes, not only Washington’s writing’s, but also his copy of The Constitution from the Constitutional Convention.
Category Archives: The Constitution
Power to the people…. pssssst, that’s in the 10th Amendment, Mr. President
Everyone seems to want to add his/her two cents to the Zimmerman verdict, so here are mine for free, long-winded and a bit rambling – just like President Obama’s. On the most basic level this tragedy occurred because both men distrusted each other’s intentions. George Zimmerman felt Trayvon Martin was a thug up to no good and called the police to report him and based on Trayvon’s girlfriend’s testimony, Trayvon felt George was a “creepy ass cracker”, who was following him. The physical altercation occurred because of these misconceptions each man held about the other one. The fact that this case is being highlighted and played up as a symbol of racism has led to extreme characterizations about both men, where oddly enough the only way to describe it is folks who believe Trayvon was murdered have whitewashed his character and tried to turn him into a choirboy, instead of a young man who liked to fight. On the other hand George Zimmerman has had his character darkened to be a racist, wanna-be cop, who wantonly murdered Trayvon Martin, instead of a young man trying to keep his neighborhood safe.
A jury decided the facts they heard in court didn’t add up to second-degree murder or manslaughter and since I didn’t watch the entire trial (because I hate sensationalized trials), I accept our jury system and the verdict, regardless whether I think the jury is right. We are “a government of laws, not of men”, as our 2nd President, John Adams, put it. For instance, in the OJ Simpson case, I believe, based on various juror statements that some jurors based their decision on jury nullification, where they felt their racial views should be the basis of their decision. That pained me to hear that, because all cases should be decided on the evidence presented in the courtroom, but I accept our jury system and give wide berth to assuming a jury acted in good faith.. Nothing I have heard about George Zimmerman’s history has led me to believe that he was a raging racist, intent on murdering a black “child”, which seems to be the characterization the shameless race-hustlers in America have decided to run with. This case is a sad testament to the true state of race relations in America – anger and distrust still simmer below the surface and despite President Obama’s happy talk about uniting America, he’s been a continual source of fostering racial tensions and inserting himself into local legal matters, where he perceives racism. Distrust, which ignited the confrontation that led to this tragedy, sadly seems likely to be used to fuel a lot more mob mentality reaction, before it’s all said and done.
Facts matter and I’ll toss out a few – racism still exists in America, but often charges of racism come way too easily, which leads to actual racial tensions when false charges of racism get tossed about. There is no evidence that George Zimmerman was a flaming racist, which is the characterization that has been made here. President Obama gave a speech today validating this characterization and really just fanning more racial tensions and I marvel at how he takes great pride in his racial identity as a “black man in America”, but he never recognizes his white heritage at all. He does make incorrect statements pertaining to local incidents where he perceives race played a part and he sure wanted to label rural Pennsylvanians as racist rednecks. In regards to his own heritage, he threw his white grandmother under the bus and proclaimed her a typical racist white person too. Among black Americans, black people who hold conservative political views get ostracized by the prominent, loud black liberal establishment and get racially tagged as “Uncle Toms” or ““house negroes” or other vile racist names. Racism cuts both ways in America and that’s the sad truth. We have a highly honed sense of equal opportunity and a high level of teaching every American to report and seek legal redress based on racial, ethnic or gender sensitivity – we are the most sue-happy people on earth. Americans can’t just sit down and talk out little instances of friction caused by misconceptions about each other or work to build trust. In America we politicize just about everything.
The statistics on black crime in America show a disproportionate percentage of violence against black people is committed by black males. Now, those in the business of racial grievance politics try to spin this into racist efforts to arrest and prosecute black men more than white men. However to highlight the glorification of violence, disrespect for the law, women and yes, even human life, you need look no further than the thriving rap music industry and listen to the vile, hate-filled, violent lyrics. Here’s one of those home truths again, who you become depends on how you are shaped, trained and molded as a child. The breakdown of American families, where black families have been hit hardest, leads to the rampant violence and most certainly is harming more black children than the tragic death of Trayvon Martin. The race-hustlers, like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the NAACP and others latched onto this case to make money and to fuel more racial discord, not promote uniting Americans. And in typical left-wing political fashion, the cause has morphed from being about “justice for Trayvon” to a full-throated effort to repeal “stand your ground laws” and more gun control efforts. Sheer political opportunism – that’s what this is. It’s a tragedy that this young man is dead, but demanding we overthrow the Constitution won’t be “justice for Trayvon” either and I would be willing to bet money that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton already plotted which governmental agencies and which people they want to shakedown in order for them to call off their protests and agitating – these two men are extortionists, who peddle in inciting anger and divisiveness. That’s a fact.
Now, rather than marching, protesting, demanding we overthrow the Constitution and toss out the 5th Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.“, maybe what’s needed most is to use this case to educate young people on The Constitution and the long, intellectual legal history that underpins our legal system. I’ll even go a step further and say, that Trayvon’s girlfriend, Rachel Jeantel, is exhibit A of our desperate need to educate children. She stated that she is “new school people” and if “new school” means you can’t read cursive handwriting and need to have your friend write letters for you, we’re in sad shape. If “new school” means we accept racist claptrap on the intricacies of acceptable racial language and when a racial slur is acceptable, then we have taken great strides backwards in our civil rights march. For talking heads to let this young woman spew this racist nonsense, unchallenged, shows how far we have sunk. Of course, she’s being used and while her handlers did a nice style makeover, listening to this young woman’s racist nonsense saddened me a great deal.
We all form our perceptions based on our own lives, so once again, this is what I learned growing up in a blue-collar, rural village. My lineage is mostly PA Dutch and growing up, many of my relatives still spoke PA Dutch at home, but everyone learned to speak English in school. English is the language of success in America – this cuts across all racial, ethnic, social strata. Speaking proper English matters and placing a high value on quality education matters too. The travesty of justice Rachel highlights is the travesty of a multicultural education, where this young woman explains the nuances of applying racial epithets on various groups of people. A common ground demand that all people deserve to be treated respectfully should be the starting point in educating all American children. I learned that it’s hard for outsiders to understand speech heavily laced in a PA Dutch accent, but that was one struggle I avoided. I couldn’t speak without stuttering, so when I finally learned to spit out a few sentences without stuttering, my speech patterns mimicked my speech teacher (who was not PA Dutch). We never expected other Americans to learn our lingo, but learned we were part of America and needed to fit in. It’s fine to embrace your own culture or language, but to succeed in America, you must speak English! Rachel apparently has a part Creole background from what I’ve read, which was highlighted to explain her halting speech. Okay, fine, I understand coming from a home where another language was present and I sure understand halting speech from years of stuttering, but we live in America and a common language keeps us unified – it’s a strong, building block of one America, not some nefarious intent to steal your culture from you.
Way too many children in America, of all races and ethnicities, live below the poverty line. As someone who grew up in decidedly less than luxurious circumstances, I do understand the difficulties of fitting in with people who have had more advantages, but rather than embracing animosity toward those who have more, our common goal has to be to help all American children become successful and to reach for the stars. Rather than spend so much effort on dressing up Rachel, someone needs to sit her down and teach her about respecting other people and teach her about America – the land of opportunity.
My mother was the hardest working person I have ever met in my life. She set such high cleanliness standards that when I joined the Army, I was perplexed by so many fellow soldiers opting to sleep on the floor rather than in their bunks. Once they had their beds made to Army standards, they feared messing it up. I had no problem making my bed to Army standards in a few minutes, because I had been doing that my entire life (my Mom was a stickler for perfect hospital corners). I found many of the Army cleanliness standards less rigorous than my mother’s, who actually did use a white glove sometimes to show us where we missed dusting (oh my, don’t’ skip dusting the door frames). My mother also learned how to do so many things and she emphasized the point that for most things in life – there’s a right way to do it. Too many Americans wallow in envying what other people have and our culture is obsessed with acquiring stuff. This emphasis on material wealth decimates many poor Americans, because so much effort is expended on acquiring things or on looking for self-worth in material objects.
We should be teaching our children that character and how you treat others is the gold standard. My mother took care of everything she had and she never allowed us to whine about what we didn’t have. She taught us to be thankful for the many blessings that living in America provides and I am still amazed at how my parents always worked hard to make the things they did have last as long as possible, yet they still managed to help others who had less. There’s always someone worse off than you and so when my father passed away, my mother told me she took my Pop’s new winter coat and gave it to a young man who worked at the gas station, because she noticed he didn’t have a warm coat. Very few young people pay any attention to the people around them, because most people, young and old alike, spend their lives distracted by electronic gadgets and on material stuff. If there’s one thing we should glean from this case is that with a little open communication between these two young men, this tragedy could have been averted and we sure need more parents in America like mine – yes, I think my parents set an excellent example and they talked about stuff like responsibility and duty and they sure didn’t want to hear a bunch of boohooing about other people having more. They would put you to work doing chores and tell you that this is America – you need to work hard and you can do anything.
I’ve noticed in many black homes there’s a copy of the MLK, “I Have A Dream” speech hanging in the living room. In first grade, one of my white “cracker” sons got selected by his black teacher to play Martin Luther King Jr. in their black history month play (true story). I heard many grumblings sitting in the audience from black parents and afterwards I mentioned this to the teacher and she told me matter-of-factly, that my son was the best at reading out loud in that class. This teacher was living by the words within that speech and maybe we all need to move in that direction. A fancy makeover isn’t going to help Rachel, once these race-baiters who are handling her get done with her. Someone needs to teach her that all people matter and her silly racial semantics are hate-filled racism baring its ugly head. I doubt anyone will tell her that though. I sure wish we could clone my son’s dedicated first grade teacher, who was a DoDDS teacher working in Germany. She exemplified excellence in teaching. She spent so much time not only trying to make classroom time count, but she spent many hours putting together a monthly program where she invited the parents and all she asked of us was that we bring some food to eat to fit the occasion. Growing up in an almost exclusively white community, no one in my school talked about Martin Luther King, Jr. during the civil rights era. Until my son had to practice that speech, I had never read the entire speech. Instead of looking for causes to divide America, leaders should read this speech and start living it. And we all need to move in the direction of talking to each other rather than escalating the distrust and racial animosity. As black activists, from the President on down, march us backwards, dividing America, it’s obvious we’ve got a ways to go before we will get people to “sit down together at a table of brotherhood”. Watching this sad national spectacle, we sure don’t seem to be any closer to his dream and our long national nightmare of dealing with the racial discord seems a vast, widening chasm of dashed hopes and way too little real change.
I can excuse Rachel for her racist statements, she’s a kid who doesn’t know better, but really the smallness of President Obama’s racial pandering and disingenuous statements about “wringing as much bias out of me”, while moments earlier in this speech he regaled us with the rampant racial profiling he experienced in his very ethnically diverse home state of Hawaii disgust me. Here’s a quote from him on growing up in Hawaii that he wrote long before this FL situation: “The opportunity that Hawaii offered—to experience a variety of cultures in a climate of mutual respect—became an integral part of my world view, and a basis for the values that I hold most dear.” He never lived in the Jim Crow South, but he sure has borrowed that narrative as his own, and it’s about as realistic as his ridiculous statement that, “Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.”…….. except for the pesky fact that unlike Trayvon, who was into ground and pound fighting, Barry liked to hang out and get high as a teenager, then he went to college in CA, followed by NY and then he became a community organizer in Chicago and then on to Harvard. Between the racial pandering at the beginning of this speech and the MLK rhetoric at the end lies the truth in this speech – he wants to expand the federal encroachment into local matters. Yes, he may be the Constitutional scholar who went to Harvard, but he sure seems intentionally, willfully determined to ignore any of the parts that are inconvenient to his far left political visions – like the 10th Amendment:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”
Filed under Culture Wars, Politics, The Constitution
The emperor and his metadata robe (Diana West’s perfect metaphor)
Being naive about technology definitely can shield one from the realities of just how disingenuous our government’s explanations about NSA surveillance rank. A couple days ago, I posted a piece about this topic where I equated this metadata collection to gigantic “junk mail folders”. A casual conversation yesterday with my son who is a software engineer left me reeling with just how clueless I, along with many other Americans, am. We heard soothing assurances lulling us into believing that everything’s safe, yes, “hey trust us”, because only metadata is being collected and the actual content of private electronic communications remains safely shielded behind this secure wall. Turns out that wall, like most that our government is entrusted to secure, offers about as much protection as our southern border defense. The new surveillance state, justified by the so-called, post 9/11 reality, exists because it’s so easy to dupe technological dummies like me (and millions of other Americans). My son explained that it’s easy to mine information from data, but he added the caveat, “it just depends what you’re looking for”. In an effort to reassure myself that the government wasn’t deliberately lulling us into submission by this “metadata” only explanation, I said, “but it’s complicated and takes a lot of effort to find out the contents that they say are protected, right?” My son smiled at my gullibility and said that he’s very good at mining data, but his skills are small fries compared to the people who do that for a living. So, I asked why this administration seems so uninformed, like in Benghazi, where they came up with the narrative of the lame youtube video caused a spontaneous protest, if they have all this amazing technology to decipher information quickly. My son hinted that might be a human lapse, not a glitch in the technology – sort of telling the boss what he wants to hear or feeding him information that fits his agenda.
This morning I stumbled upon this tidbit of information in a Rick Moran column (here). In 2008 the Obama administration slipped in some amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, called the FISA Amendments Act, which empower the attorney general to access all of your private communications without any prior approval from the FISA court. The Obama administration wrote enough loopholes into this act to stray far beyond any legislative constraints, leading me to the sad realization that this wall of protection for our private communications exists only as a rhetorical flourish to deflect us from asking more questions.
At this point, the more I read trying to understand the terminology, the more I realize that even the terminology exists in a relativist’s utopia. Metadata, means data about data, but even that definition according to Wikipedia, is ambiguous (here). The simplistic analogy that it’s like your phone records, which aren’t considered protected and needing a subpoena to access, seems rather hollow in light of just how much information about your private life can be gleaned from sifting through your metadata. Since most of us remain clueless about the terms, the government feels secure, knowing that telling us “it’s just metadata” will keep us quiet because, we don’t really want to know how exposed we are.
Diana West, a brilliant political commentator, refers to this symptom in her new book, “American Betrayal; The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (here), as the situation in the children’s story, “The Emperor’s New Clothes” (here), where everyone pretends to see the invisible new clothes, except for a guileless child, who shouts out that the emperor is naked. Maybe, metadata is just another set of fine invisible clothes the government has donned to keep us in our place, but hopefully a few brave adults will cry out that they don’t see it . Her Townhall.com columns can be found (here) and her blog (here). West lays out the stakes for our country much more eloquently than I could ever hope to in her latest column No Constitution, No Borders, No USA.
Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, Politics, The Constitution
George Will on constitutional limits – time for some choke collars
The incomparable, George Will, perfectly explains the Constitutional fork in the road in America’s last century, in a column titled, “Slipping the constitutional leash” . This “must-read” column lays out the history of our abandonment of the 10th Amendment (Washington Post column here) and the road not taken.
Filed under American History, Politics, The Constitution
NSA Junk Mail Folders
This latest massive security leak over the NSA spying on American citizens routine internet usage and on our allies (as well as our enemies) triggered the press to jump into a frenzied mob, albeit a very mindless mob at that. “How dare the government spy on us” seems to be what’s got them in a tizzy. Skip the American press to get any solid reporting! The UK paper, The Guardian, landed the major haul – an in-depth interview with the self-identified leaker, Edward Snowden, a former technical assistant for the CIA. (interview here & here).
The dilemma for many of us, follow all the rules types, is that our instant reaction to this story is to demand they prosecute this leaker to the full extent of the law. Whenever I catch wind of these stories of people with security clearances blatantly violating the trust placed in them by their government, well, I automatically judge that behavior reprehensible. Since 9/11 our government leaped into overdrive on revamping, expanding and completely overhauling our intelligence capabilities, to atone for the colossal intelligence failures that led to that horrific attack. The problem seems to be that with so many different agencies and contractors involved in this devilish monstrosity, that only big government can spawn, no one seems to be able to know for certain the full scope of our “intelligence-gathering” on ordinary, law-abiding American citizens. The even larger looming security risk is with the government relying so heavily on private contractors for much of this work, our intelligence agencies set up a very insecure “team” to run this show. Our premier intelligence agencies, which we’re paying through the teeth to fund, farm out much of this surveillance work to private contractors and seem to be placing our national security in their hands, rather than in the hands of fully vetted and accountable government employees. (another piece from theguardian).
Amazingly, with so much spent to gather this vast amount of intelligence, the best this administration could come up with on Benghazi was blaming some lame video and offering varying “narratives”, minus any concrete evidence or hard facts. No one in the administration has ever fully explained how Fast and Furious came about or who authorized it. We’ve got an attorney general who blazed to national prominence in the Waco/Ruby Ridge/Elian Gonzalez (corrupt to the core) Reno Justice Department and he seems incapable of speaking the truth, so help him God! The former Secretary of State, told us, “what difference does it make?” and she, who rode her husband’s splendid political coat tails to power and who wielded many Presidential powers as the media cheered, “two for one”, to this day is hailed as one of America’s most respected women. What a marvel there, where she ran a team of scurrilous sewer rats in relentless forays looking for any dirt she could dig on any and all she perceived as political enemies. The media turned a blind-eye to her crazed witch hunts (the extent which hopefully someday sees the light of day). She trolled the internet looking for a vast, right-wing conspiracy way back then – an internet trailblazer for sure. And truly, no one in this administration has come anywhere close to understanding the Arab Spring or much of anything else going on in the world.
Billions upon billions spent for intelligence and this is the “quality” of what our government comes up with??? We’re spending a fortune for useless junk mail folders filled to overflowing. The clowns in this administration couldn’t put the pieces of some complicated intelligence puzzle together even with a numbered diagram in front of them and all the pieces already numbered to show them where they fit. Basically we’re paying a fortune to fill up bottomless junk mail folders of useless minutiae. What’s missing from all this reliance on computer wizardry and the ability to acquire so much information is a commensurate level of human intelligence to provide the nuanced analytical requirement to produce a quality intelligence product.
A corrupt government deserves no loyalty and certainly this administration nudged out the Clinton thugs for the title of most corrupt administration in my lifetime. So, I’m left in a moral quandary over this latest leaker, not ready to hail him as a hero for the people and not quite ready to demand we leave no avenue untraveled to hunt him down. Our government is a national disgrace and quite frankly, we should all demand better, because let’s hope we, the American people, still hold true to some pride in being an honest, generous, worthy nation. Let’s hope there are enough of us left who still believe in the Constitution and the rule of law.
Filed under Foreign Policy, Politics, The Constitution, The Media
Lessons From The Village
In the past week the Obama scandals seem to be multiplying faster than rabbits. Benghazi blazed back to life, the IRS scandal hadn’t even crested, when the AP and FOX news reporters phones and emails being monitored by the Obama Justice Department hit (here, here, here). Then, the Oklahoma tornado pretty much sidelined all other news since yesterday and the White House got a slight reprieve from the media barrage. Obviously, these scandals will pick up steam and more will assuredly come to light as the abuses of unchecked power of bureaucrats in the executive branch swell beyond the administration’s ability to spin (LIE) them away as right-wing conspiracy witch hunts. Some of those witch hunters should invest in sturdier brooms to sweep this bunch of dirtballs out the door, but sadly way too many Republicans in Washington get too caught up in the partisan politics rather than scrupulously following the law and keeping this about upholding the Constitution rather than setting the stage for the 2014 election cycle. Upholding the rule of law should be the paramount concern. The truth should matter.
The partisan divide, where both political factions spend more time trying to take down the other side than they do trying to actually govern in a positive way, leaves us stuck with a country fractured and bleeding and having fewer and fewer shared values to patch our wounds. The distrust of President Obama propelled gun and ammunition sales off the charts. The reports of Homeland Security and other federal agencies stockpiling ammo, makes one wonder if this distrust cuts both ways. Comments by Obama officials about radical right-wingers, potentially dangerous soldiers and Christians demonstrates that the distrust runs both ways and makes one wonder where this will all lead. Then the recent reports about the military targeting Christians as potential extremists hinted at a planned purging of the US military officer corps, had me wondering if we’re in for a drastic attempt at politicizing and radicalizing our armed forces, where far-left kooks set the policies.
To survive, our country needs to find it’s way back to some shared values and if we can’t do that our Republic will not survive as the great beacon of hope it has been. For me, the Constitution always served as the keystone of my American value system. Being from PA, well, we are big on the “keystone” rhetorical device, lol. As a child growing up in a rural village (yes, I know more about village life than the official “it takes a village” expert of America), the turmoil of the 60s and 70s pretty much passed us by. We did have some hippies move into some old farmsteads and try the back to nature living. I remember one communal group bringing their kids to our vacation Bible school and I had a few of their children in my preschool class ( I got the youngest group – because no one wanted to deal with all that crying and constant having to use the bathroom). We weren’t sure what to make of folks living in a commune and they sure seemed uneasy about us. What happens when people distrust each other is the misunderstandings, exaggerations and fabrications about the other group multiply and spread. I remember hearing fantastic stories about the orgies, drugs and nefarious doings of this particular group. After talking to several of these mothers over many months, I realized that they were a Christian group trying to live a simple life in the country. They named their children Biblical names. And after getting to know them, I realized these fantastic stories weren’t remotely true. Even more dramatic was when we had the first black families move into our area – once again more distrust, wild stories, etc., because they came from inner-city Philadelphia (those dreaded “city” people) and it was several families living together and oh my, they were “black” (which to some locals made them as threatening as the whole Soviet Army). These children rode on our bus and I wanted to learn about our new neighbors, so I talked to them and found out that they weren’t threatening in the least. The one certain thing I knew was they were scared to death at first getting on a bus with all white kids. Life in a village taught me (as I’ve repeatedly said) that getting to know people matters more than all the “I heard” or “I have it on good authority” or “everyone says” in the world.
Our leaders need to start agreeing on some simple common values to build trust in our institutions again and also in each other. If we continue to let partisan politicos send us rampaging about one hot button issue after another, we’re doomed. We can’t continue to play dangerous, divisive political games where we pit various groups of Americans against each other for political advantage. The village expert of America, Hillary Clinton, perfected this evil vast, right-wing conspiracy hysteria and we now have a Homeland Security department profiling former servicemen and tea party types as “dangerous”. We’ve got some right-wing talk radio types who fuel the conspiracy theories about the federal government. It’s way past time for average Americans to stop letting themselves be played like this. It’s hurting our country! We’ve got to agree on some common values – like respect for the rule of law, the belief that everyone counts in America, the belief that the strong must protect the weak, advocate for being a good neighbor in both word and deed. These are simple values that should not be controversial, regardless of your race, ethnicity or religious views. If we spent half as much time teaching our children to treat other people with respect and basic manners, as we do with all this politicized diversity claptrap, green agenda and endless causes, we might make some progress at restoring order to our classrooms. Really, treating other people with respect and taking the time to get to know people – how controversial is that?
Filed under American Character, Food for Thought, Politics, The Constitution
Ted Cruz Targets Extreme Federal Power Grabs
Ted Cruz, the newest senator from Texas, published a report, “The Legal Limit: The Obama Administration’s Attempts To Expand Federal Power”, critiquing the Obama administration’s attempts to expand federal power in ways that defy constitutional boundaries. His report highlights six cases that came before the US Supreme Court since January, in which the court ruled that the Obama administration exceeded constitutional limits on federal power. The six cases Senator Cruz details cover many different constitutional areas, from religious freedoms to the attaching GPS to a private citizen’s car with no just cause needed. This report shows the nearly limitless view of federal power that President Obama holds, where he thinks the US Constitution should be about the government’s power (to control you), not a protection of the people from government excesses. This administration needs a refresher course on The Federalist Papers (free here).
Filed under Politics, The Constitution
The Tea Party Lives
On Wednesday the junior Senator, Rand Paul, from Kentucky breathed life back into the Tea Party movement with his gutsy filibuster, while rankling the old goats of the GOP. He showed the disenchanted Republicans throughout the country that one voice does matter and one citizen committed to the Constitution can force even hard-nosed political operators, like Eric Holder, to respond. Paul explains his motivations and beliefs in this Washington Post article (here). So far, Holder deflected answering the Fast and Furious questions honestly, trying to change the message and hoping time will distance the demands for answers. Considering Holder honed his political muscle in the corrupt and overreaching Reno Justice Department, Rand’s feat played out as one of those David and Goliath moments, where one man, taking a principled stand, stood against the political powers that be in Washington and actually won. Holder caved and responded to Paul’s demand for an answer on the limits on drone strikes (here) on American soil. Even the reliably left-slanted Slate website carried a piece headlined, Rand Paul: Filibuster Shows “Americans Are Looking for Someone to Really Stand Up, (here). Ted Cruz, Texas’s newest Senator, jumped into the filibuster and let’s be hopeful that he continues speaking up and taking on the fight for responsible federal spending, serious debt reduction, and championing limited federal governance as our constitutional republic demands (he turned me into an admirer already).
Typically, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, rushed to the nearest microphones to deride Rand Paul’s filibuster, because these two windbags seem to be the self-appointed airwaves traffic controllers for the GOP, believing they direct the GOP media efforts and set the GOP agenda. Paul’s shining moment angered these two , because for once Americans saw that there’s a new GOP wind blowing in Washington. No one cares what John McCain says and while Eric Holder’s tenure as Attorney General causes one to shudder in horror, the specter of Lindsey Graham running the Justice Department offers not a bit more comfort. Just like a McCain presidency most likely would offer little more coherence than Obama’s, considering McCain’s murky, shifting positions on national security issues and his need to be popular rather than right on the issues. Truth be told, their constant rush to get on every cable news outlet and hog the spotlight diminishes them to merely cartoon-like stature and considering how many times they flipped positions on national security issues, the Obama administration’s strong-arm tactics and just about every other important issue, do Republicans even care about what they say? The left-leaning media elites keep shamelessly using these two useful idiots for the Democrats and even President Obama makes use of their preening need to get in front of any camera within a mile. Does anyone think President Obama’s reach-across-the-aisle dinner came about for any reason other than to improve his sinking poll numbers over his overplayed hand on sequestration? Only dupes like McCain and Graham could be that gullible. And how dare these GOP upstarts garner some national media attention, without first seeking their blessings, seems to sum up their angry reaction to Rand Paul’s impressive filibuster. This President doesn’t compromise as he relentlessly plods along with his transformation of America into a socialist mecca, where government of, by and for the people gets buried by executive fiat, in favor of government “takes care” of the people – literally, if you don’t like it, the government will most assuredly “take care” of you, Chicago-style. PJ Media writer, Michael Walsh, penned a scathing review of John McCain’s actual biography, hinting that the automatic hero-worship aura, may finally be approaching an end (here). Hope springs eternal, in this season, where mayhap some new conservative voices will burst into bloom and the old goats get put out to pasture to chew their cud (here).
Filed under Politics, The Constitution