Category Archives: Military

On the march with some old Romans

Here is the quote I was looking for on restoring a republic, from “Discourses on Livy” by Niccolo Machiavelli, Book III, Chapter 1:

“A republic may, likewise, be brought back to its original form, without recourse to ordinances for enforcing justice, by the mere virtues of a single citizen, by reason that these virtues are of such influence and authority that good men love to imitate them, and bad men are ashamed to depart from them.”

Machiavelli goes on to list some illustrious Romans of great virtue, who changed the course of the republic by virtue of their upstanding characters, so it’s not like he’s spouting idealistic theories.

For more inspiring Romans, I always turn to “The Meditations”  by Marcus Aurelis, which begins:

“From my grandfather Verus I learned good morals and the government of my temper.

From the reputation and remembrance of my father, modesty and a manly character.

From my mother, piety and beneficence, and abstinence, not only from evil deeds, but even from evil thoughts; and further, simplicity in my way of living, far removed from the habits of the rich.”

Now if that doesn’t demonstrate the timelessness of family values coming from the second century (161 AD or I guess CE is the preferred method now), I don’t know what does.

Now just when you think you’ve heard as much about the Romans as you might wish to know, here’s the Roman connection of my hero, George Washington to Cincinnatus, the Roman general called from his retirement as a simple farmer to once more lead the Romans to defeat the Aequians.  Right from the Mount Vernon website (here), “For Romans and Americans alike, Cincinnatus represented the ideal republican simplicity, an enlightened poverty that spurned luxury and cultivated a simple nobility of spirit.”  This comparison of George Washington to Cincinnatus led to the formation of the Society of the Cincinnati, composed of former Revolutionary War officers, with naturally, Washington being the first elected president of the society.  The Mount Vernon website states the society adopted the Latin motto, Omnia reliquit servare rem publicam (“He gave up everything to serve the republic”) alluding to the story of Cincinnatus.

If all these Roman names are a mystery to you, spend a few minutes googling, but as most of my readers seem to read more history than me, that probably won’t be necessary.  I have mentioned this book before, but since here’s another opportunity to wax on about a book that makes learning about the Romans fun.  Yes, really  this book is written tongue-in-cheek and it will bring a smile to your face and you’ll be anxiously wanting to sign up to be a legionary too.  The book is called, “Legionary; the Roman Soldier’s (Unofficial) Manual”.

3 Comments

Filed under American History, Food for Thought, History, Military

But hey, they sound good…

That old tired proverb, “necessity is the mother of invention” should be drilled into our military planners’ heads, as evidenced by this report in the “At War: Notes From the Front Lines” column in the New York Times a few days ago, “Insights Into How Insurgents Fought In Iraq”, by John Ismay, which chronicles a detailed look at not only the types of weaponry used by insurgents in Iraq, but even more importantly the creative and inventive ways in how they used them.   The article brings to the fore that there is no magic force equation, like our doctrinaire belief in “overwhelming force” being the only consideration in strategic planning.  We possessed all the force advantages and insurgents came along and improvised continuously, as this article explains, using even a weapon, the obsolete RKG-3 Soviet-era grenade in creative ways to capitalize on a convoy formation weakness, whereby they engaged close-up with our convoy straggler vehicles.  Ismay goes on to explain that Iraq was awash in all sorts of weaponry and insurgents made not only tactical decisions based on the terrain (often urban areas), but also were able to form strategic plans, where they adapted quickly and improvised, while we were slow at securing weapons caches.

The lessons learned from an enemy that improvises with a wide array of weapons, like in Iraq, will challenge our military planners in other hot spots, so rather than get caught up in COIN, 4th Generation War or any of the other theories, perhaps, we should take a page out of our adversaries’ playbook and put emphasis on being adaptable on the battlefield, giving commanders some leeway to improvise and get rid of some of the lawyers, bogging down our forces.  The first thing we need is what they have and we are sorely missing – strategic clarity.  They have a clearly understood mission, that even their most lowly suicidal nut embraces.  We have media-ready sound bytes.   And let’s face it, we might not be so successful in other battlefields against committed religious zealots, by showing up with suitcases of cash, trying to bribe cooperation and loyalty (not that we’ve been very successful thus far actually).  We need to quit with the PC-induced military theories and deal with the real facts on the ground, which most likely will look quite different from the propagandized claptrap the political generals are spouting on TV, with dewy-eyed reporters prefacing all this crapola with: “Today I am interviewing, General Bullshitter, a renowned military expert of his generation, blah, blah, blah.”  Then we get deluged in more crackpot theories, half-baked strategies that lead us nowhere………… but hey, they sound good and the clueless press and low information voters eat this up and repeat the lies.

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, The Media

U.S. Middle East Policy: The Wrong Response to 9/11

Good article by Barry Rubin at The Counter Jihad Report.

U.S. Middle East Policy: The Wrong Response to 9/11.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics

Following the map to American irrelevancy

More big picture strategic moves in the works hit the press lately and none of them are being made by the United States.  China brought up and escalated talk about a replacement currency for the US dollar and now, in light of our fiscal irresponsibility, they’re pushing hard  for it again and you know what, more countries might buy into that (story here).  And Putin continues to play chess, while Obama gloats about his “winning” this latest petty fiscal showdown with the Republicans in Congress.  Putin orchestrated the US ouster from using the base at Manas in Kyrgyzstan, putting our travel distance,  this is an “if” Hagel works out a deal with Romania to use a base there for supply routing, from 638 miles using Manas to Kabul to 2300 miles from Romania to Afghanistan (story here).  Yes, Mr. President,  you’re quite the strategic genius on the world stage and at home.  Can anyone spell the word “retreat”, because most assuredly others see America’s rear march commander in action and they eagerly want to close with an adversary in full retreat, waving a white flag.  This President can’t even define America’s national interests in real terms, but prefers to roost in dangerously delusional far-left cloud-cuckoo-land, while America’s adversaries keep their eyes and strategic objectives in sharp focus – no head in the clouds from their vantage point.  It’s very sad to be able to understand and appreciate your adversaries’ strategic moves, while being totally baffled and embarrassed by your own country’s ineptitude and cluelessness in every international endeavor.  We are not only losing in small strategic instances internationally, we’re losing American power in both reputation and in deed – all because of this President’s failure to understand America’s strategic national interests in the real world, not his college campus leftie causes.

America, in past generations, has had presidents who rise to the occasion and lead our country competently through perilous times without the benefit of actual military experience.  However, in times past it was a given that these men had a working knowledge of military history and geography.   A few missteps could be naive mistakes, but watching President Obama’s stream of anti-American moves we should be aware that  before us now, or maybe slinking around, leading us from behind, is one who is more inclined to side with our adversaries than our own military.  It’s frightening that more Americans can’t see that this man is dangerously working against us.  I wonder if he even understands the importance of supply lines to military operations, but then again for him soldiers are likely terrorists and terrorists are misunderstood freedom fighters.  Don’t let the bumbling explanations fool you – he’s deliberately and determinedly following his own map to American irrelevancy….. and moving at warp speed to get there.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics

G. Murphy Donovan: “The Decline and Fall of National Security”

With the advent of the internet, many common sense understandings about copyright protections and acceptable usage of other writers’ works seem to have flown out the window.  Many times I’ve been tempted to just post entire articles or pictures from other websites, but my “following the rules” nature caused me to hesitate.  Stratfor authorizes reprinting their articles, so I took the liberty of posting that, but I’ll continue writing my  rather boring little pieces about great articles and offering a link.  Here’s another very insightful piece by none other than the amazing G. Murphy Donovan (GMD), in which he cuts through the trendy strategic claptrap and hones in on strategic ground truth and our national security  demise (from The American Thinker, “The Decline and Fall of National Security”).  GMD chronicles the American intelligence demise coupled with the rampant politicization of our top military brass.  I would add one other factor to his list – the complete collapse of a shared national security viewpoint among our two main political parties and amongst our populace.  Many days reading or watching the news, it sure looks like each side views the opposing domestic political party as the main national security threat rather than any foreign entity.  From biblical times to today, that old adage that a house divided cannot long stand presages our demise, unless we can find a way to fix our foundational damage and rebuild a more sound structure – tall order with the fractured polity and populace in America presently.

12 Comments

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, Military, Politics

Gladius Maximus predicts end game: Russia 10; US 1.

Gladius emailed his Syria predictions.  Comments anyone?

BHOzo will claim victory for peace in the Middle East.
>
> Putin will do the work because the Russians don’t give a hoot about the environment anyway. They will destroy the chemicals some way or other. Or at least some of them.
>
> Within a year there will be a soviet mech infantry corps in Syria to “protect the workers.”
>
> Russia will finally have a military post in the Mideast, a warm water port, control of pipelines and a market outlet for its oil and weapons.
>
> Russia will kill all the rebels it can and there will be no imbedded journalists to witness how it is done.
>
> BHOzo will claim credit because there will be no US boots on the ground.
>
> Israel will then be faced with a large Russian force on its border.
>
> End game: Russia 10; US 1.

6 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Gladius Maximus, Military, Politics

Oh, those pesky “facts”

The UK Telegraph ran a report today from IHS Jane’s, stating that nearly half of the rebel fighters in Syria are hardline Islamists/jihadis (report here).  According to Charles Lister, the author of the report, the idea that the insurgency is mostly secular in nature, just isn’t borne out by the facts.  Just a reminder that a week and a half ago  John Kerry was still quoting Ms. Elizabeth O’Bagy, former senior analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, with her lowball estimates of radical Syrian rebels (Reuters report here).   My how “facts” change so quickly ……..

6 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics, The Media

Institute for the Study of War fires Elizabeth O’Bagy

Politico and PJ Media report that the Institute for the Study of War fired Elizabeth O’Bagy, their senior analyst and resident expert on Syria.  According to ISW, Dr. O’Bagy lied on her application and does not possess a doctorate degree, nor did she disclose her connections to the Syrian Emergency Task Force (stories here and here).  Let’s hope ISW reviews their hiring procedures and institutes a more thorough vetting process, since it took me less than five minutes to figure out her connection to this Syrian rebel advocacy group. One can hope John McCain and John Kerry pause to reflect that this young woman might be aligned with a foreign entity and that the way this played out makes them willing dupes.  Nah, never happen with those egotistical windbags. The other big takeaway from this from my purely contrarian nature concerns our national intelligence gathering and analysis.  One can only pause to wonder what official intelligence on the disposition of the Syrian rebel forces crossed the desks of Kerry and McCain, if they felt this dubious young lady’s reporting carried more weight.  We pay a fortune on intelligence gathering, but do we focus enough on the human intelligence and analytical components to sift through our vast stores of information and actually piece together an accurate and timely intelligence product?

9 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military, Politics

Benghazi: the Obama hens prepare to cluck, cluck, cluck

Roger L. Simon penned a withdrawal of his support for Obama’s (not quite war) Syrian adventure at PJ Media- “Going to War with the Blind General of Benghazi (An Apology)”, filled with apologies for ever supporting going to war with a leader who lacks a moral compass.  Our fearless leader demonstrated he’s willing to use dead Americans as props for a photo-op, when he and Madame Secretary greeted the return of our slain from Benghazi.  He went on for months (ok weeks) with a fabricated story about the YouTube video.  For those who say American credibility is at stake in Syria, well, unless the rest of the world is deaf, dumb and blind, they already figured out we have a weak, mendacious, arrogant, indecisive, leading-from-behind “commander” rallying the troops.  Yay, he makes me want to salute and sign on………ok……….. not so much.  He’s sent out, who better than,  Mr. I-Was-For-It-Before-I-Was-Against-It Kerry, to sell this military action to other foreign leaders, with presses gleefully running photos of the Kerrys and Assads cozily dining together, oh memories, lalala, misty watercolor memories of the way we were.  Never fear though, the dragon lady of Benghazi, aka the smartest woman in the world, returns to assist her replacement, according to morning news updates on Fox News.  Who better to put forth an administration tough stance (just give her a sword to wave above her head), so she can shriek, “What difference at this point does it make!”  If the farce couldn’t take a more decided veer into sheer bedlam, he’s sending Susan Rice to testify before Congress, on 9/11 no less.

14 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, Military

B.H. Liddell Hart echoes through time

Since I’m always yammering on about military history and military strategy (of which I am a novice-thinker truthfully), here’s my short take on some great places to start reading on war.  I am enamored at the crystal-clear wisdom on strategy and tactics found in Sun Tzu, “The Art of War”  the ancient Chinese classic on war.  It’s widely available online and in print and while it’s a little book, the ideas in it are enormously important and resonate through the ages, providing the best foundation in studying war that I have ever come across.  Western armies love their Clausewitz, but Sun Tzu won my heart on military strategy long, long ago.  (available free here and here).  I have several versions of “The Art of War”, but my favorite is a version translated by Samuel B. Griffith, an American WWII general, who studied Chinese and translated  Sun Tzu and Mao’s, “On Guerrilla Warfare”.  B.H. Liddell Hart, the renowned British historian and expert on military history and military strategy,  wrote the foreword for General Griffith’s Sun Tzu book and he stated that he found more wisdom on the fundamentals of military strategy and tactics in Sun Tzu than he had covered in more than 20 other books.  Hart stated that Sun Tzu was “the best short introduction to the study of warfare, and no less valuable for constant reference in extending study of the subject.”

I downloaded B.H. Liddell Hart’s short book, “Why We Don’t Learn From History” to my kindle ($1.99 for the kindle version here) recently and am about 2/3s of the way through it.  Here’s a quote that encapsulates the type of wisdom you’ll find within this slim volume:

“Civilization is built on the practice of keeping promises.  It may not sound a high attainment, but if trust in its observance be shaken the whole structure cracks and sinks.  Any constructive effort and all human relations – personal, political, and commercial – depend on being able to depend on promises.”

Coming from my Pop’s, “if you give your word, you keep it”, upbringing, it’s obvious why I greatly admire B.H. Liddell Hart’s writings:-)

7 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, History, Military