Category Archives: American History

The power of free thinking

To understand the power of free thinking, I recommend reading , “My Bondage and My Freedom” by Frederick Douglass.  Here is a free gutenberg.org version, but I have it downloaded on my kindle, so here is the free kindle version too.

Frederick Douglass was born an American slave in 1818 in Maryland and he died a champion of human rights, an abolitionist, a writer, renowned orator, but most of all a FREE man in 1895. (short bio here).

Douglass relates how as a slave, learning to read was forbidden, but a white mistress undertook teaching him to read for a short time, before being reprimanded by her husband.  From that point on, Douglass embarked on a secret, dangerous mission to educate himself:

“Seized with a determination to learn to read, at any cost, I hit upon many expedients to accomplish the desired end. The plea which I mainly adopted, and the one by which I was most successful, was that of using my young white playmates, with whom I met in the streets as teachers. I used to carry, almost constantly, a copy of Webster’s spelling book in my pocket; and, when sent of errands, or when play time was allowed me, I would step, with my young friends, aside, and take a lesson in spelling. I generally paid my tuition fee to the boys, with bread, which I also carried in my pocket. For a single biscuit, any of my hungry little comrades would give me a lesson more valuable to me than bread. Not every one, however, demanded this consideration, for there were those who took pleasure in teaching me, whenever I had a chance to be taught by them.”

Douglass, Frederick (2009-10-04). My Bondage and My Freedom (p. 85). Public Domain Books Kindle Edition.

Douglass heard some white boys mention a schoolbook, The Columbian Orator, and determined to acquire a copy.  He bought a copy for fifty cents.  The Columbian Orator was a popular 19th century schoolbook filled with speeches and essays, geared to promote republican virtues (in other words, good citizenship,  if you are living in a republic like the United States of America) and patriotism.  To quote Douglass:

“I had now penetrated the secret of all slavery and oppression, and had ascertained their true foundation to be in the pride, the power and the avarice of man. The dialogue and the speeches were all redolent of the principles of liberty, and poured floods of light on the nature and character of slavery. With a book of this kind in my hand, my own human nature, and the facts of my experience, to help me, I was equal to a contest with the religious advocates of slavery, whether among the whites or among the colored people, for blindness, in this matter, is not confined to the former. I have met many religious colored people, at the south, who are under the delusion that God requires them to submit to slavery, and to wear their chains with meekness and humility. I could entertain no such nonsense as this; and I almost lost my patience when I found any colored man weak enough to believe such stuff.”

Douglass, Frederick (2009-10-04). My Bondage and My Freedom (p. 87). Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition.

He continued:

“Once awakened by the silver trump of knowledge, my spirit was roused to eternal wakefulness. Liberty! the inestimable birthright of every man, had, for me, converted every object into an asserter of this great right. It was heard in every sound, and beheld in every object. It was ever present, to torment me with a sense of my wretched condition. The more beautiful and charming were the smiles of nature, the more horrible and desolate was my condition.”

Douglass, Frederick (2009-10-04). My Bondage and My Freedom (pp. 87-88). Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition.

2 Comments

Filed under American Character, American History, Education, Food for Thought, General Interest

Lecture – Hillsdale College Online Courses

Lecture – Hillsdale College Online Courses.

Here’s a free online introduction to The Federalist Papers, which every American should read and understand.

2 Comments

Filed under American History, Food for Thought, General Interest, Politics, The Constitution

General George Washington enters the vaccine debate

America suffers from a plague!  No, it’s not an epidemiological type, but a deadly strain of political cowardice and vacuous pandering.  Here we are in 2015, with supposedly educated “leaders” from both sides of the American political spectrum parsing and prevaricating on the wisdom of having children vaccinated against illnesses, which can prove fatal.

Up first, Rand Paul tweets a photo of himself receiving a booster vaccination Tuesday, after stating on Monday (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/rand-paul-vaccines-can-lead-mental-disorders-n298821) :

“In an interview with the network Monday, Paul said that vaccines are “a good thing” but that parents “should have some input” into whether or not their children must get them.

 And he gave credence to the idea – disputed by the majority of the scientific community – that vaccination can lead to mental disabilities.

“I have heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines,” he said.”

Chris Christie also straddled the fence on the vaccine issue, before coming down on the vaccinate children side, but including that parents should have a choice.

Then, yesterday,  Hillary Clinton, one never to pass up an opportunity to take gutless political positions, boldly proclaims she’s all for vaccinations, but in 2008 she was playing along with the totally unproven pop culture linkage of autism being caused by vaccines (full story here):

“But in the 2008 campaign, Clinton herself raised questions about vaccines. “I am committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines,” Clinton said in the 2008 campaign, suggesting a possible connection between autism and vaccines.”

Now, “Grandmother Hillary knows best” tweeted :

“The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and . Let’s protect all our kids.

Oh how I long for a strong, morally upright, forward thinking leader for America – in the image of my hero, General George Washington, who ordered the  inoculation of the Continental Army for smallpox in 1777.   He didn’t focus group test the matter, no,  he made an informed decision to best protect his troops.  George Washington survived small pox as a young man, despite small pox’s mortality rate of 30%.

In 1776 a small pox epidemic broke out in Boston, which was under siege by the British army.  General Washington forbade refugees from Boston to come near his troops.  From Mary V. Thompson, research historian at Mount Vernon Estate and Gardens:

“While Washington believed wholeheartedly in the efficacy of inoculation, in May of 1776 he ordered that no one in his army be inoculated; violations of this order would result in severe punishment. The summer campaigns were about to begin and Washington could not afford to have a large number of his men incapacitated for a month, vulnerable to attack by the British. Washington eventually instituted a system where new recruits would be inoculated with smallpox immediately upon enlistment. As a result soldiers would contract the milder form of the disease at the same time that they were being outfitted with uniforms and weapons. Soldiers would consequently be completely healed, inoculated, and supplied by the time they left to join the army.”

Really, this is 2015 and we’ve got politicians so afflicted by the disease, widely believed to cause atrophy of all functioning brain cells – full-blown political correctness.  Really, it’s true, just judge for yourself, as you watch them slither along, unable to articulate coherent thoughts.  Sorry,  there is no hope of survival for those afflicted by this dreaded disease and like General Washington’s policy in 1776, avoiding contact with them offers the best hope that you can emerge unscathed, a free critical thinker, with your brain cells intact and functioning.

3 Comments

Filed under American History, Culture Wars, General Interest, Military, Politics

Doomed?

From National Review Online, “Progressives Gnaw at the Curriculum”, Mona Charen writes:

“Only about 18 percent of American colleges require a survey course on U.S. history or government. Then again, when they do teach U.S. history, they tend to do so in a highly tendentious fashion. As my colleague Jay Nordlinger has observed, “It’s all slavery, racism, and the internment of Japanese-Americans in World War II.”

This is deadly serious business. Civilizations are not self-sustaining enterprises. People must believe that their society and culture are worth preserving. If we don’t teach our children the fundamentals of American history and government, they will not have the knowledge or perspective necessary to maintain it.”

Her article offers dismal statistics on how young Americans fare at understanding US history, with the educational system mired in grievance politics.  This brought to mind an old LB post, “A few thoughts about the Lewis and Clark expedition”, where I offered my views on teaching history:

“In recent decades so much hot air has been expended over how to teach history and just about every other subject.  Truly discouraging battles continue to be waged over textbooks, where politically charged combatants wrestle over every single entry.  The Texas textbook fights have garnered national media attention.   With so much information available, it seems to me that instead of fighting over whether to include this or that historical figure and how many lines get devoted to each, the time might be better spent teaching kids how to explore history – it should be a journey, or an expedition into uncharted territory not a political mud-wrestling match.   Just look at a few of the entries in the Lewis and Clark journals, where they charted maps and terrain features, they drew pictures of the flora and fauna, talked to the natives, they wrote as many detailed entries as their harsh conditions allowed.  They did this so that they could come back and share it with others.  This is what education should be – sharing knowledge.”

On a tangential topic, teaching kids to be survivors, let me once again recommend Gladius’ essay, “Gimme a Knife” and a wonderful exploration of the Lewis and Clark journals from an American Thinker article by David L. Lenard, “Looking Back at Lewis and Clark”.  Lenard takes you on a rich trip through the journals, offering up fascinating tidbits that contrast survival techniques like caching supplies (burying them) for later use, which will make modern-day, hide and seek,  geocaching using GPS for entertainment seem rather silly.  Lenard contrasts the abilities of the Lewis and Clark explorers to our modern-day culture:

“What a difference from today, where the handwringing of nervous housewives (“God forbid little Jimmy should encounter peanut traces in his food”) dominates our daily existence, and the liberal imperative of nanny-state overregulation promises the illusion of lives lived in perfect safety and perfect comfort, without risk or suffering or even unpleasantness.  Self-sufficiency is anathema to this mentality, but the Lewis and Clark expedition was self-sufficient to an almost unbelievable degree: they not only hunted their own food, but, when necessary, built their own boats; sewed their own clothes; and when it was too cold to travel, built their own forts — not once, but twice.

In our modern republic, where large segments of our population compete to be declared helpless victims so they can receive government handouts, one cannot help but think that little Jimmy might benefit from being sent out with Drouilliard: “Here’s a musket, son — now go kill that deer, and don’t miss, because if you do, there’s a strong possibility you might starve.””

I’ll leave it there for you to think about the educational riches we have available, free and easily accessible, in America, yet so many Americans lack the will to improve themselves:

“Survival is more a mind-set than a setting. Attitude is everything.” – Gladius, “Gimme a Knife”

Leave a comment

Filed under American History, Culture Wars, Education, Food for Thought, General Interest, Politics

OKBOMB Revisited

If you like whodunit mysteries, John Schindler at the XX Committee wrote a fascinating piece about all the loose threads from the Oklahoma City bombing, which is coming upon it’s 20 year anniversary next year: “Lingering OKBOMB Questions”.

Leave a comment

Filed under American History, General Interest, Politics, Terrorism

America at another crossroads

Gladius forwarded an important Thomas Sowell column, “Local or National Elections?”, which explains the stakes of this year’s battle over control of the Senate. Dr. Sowell, in his inimitable style, reminds us that while Tip O’Neill popularized the “all politics is local” phrase, on some elections in Washington the very course of America’s future rests.   In clear, simple terms he explains:

“In 1860, some abolitionists split the anti-slavery vote by running their own candidate — who had no chance of winning — instead of supporting Abraham Lincoln, who was not pure enough for some abolitionists. Lincoln got just 40 percent of the vote, though that turned out to be enough to win in a crowded field.

But what a gamble with the fate of millions of human beings held as slaves! And for what? Symbolic political purity?

This year as well, there are third-party candidates complicating elections that can decide the fate of this nation for years to come. No candidate that irresponsible deserves any vote. With all the cross-currents of political controversies raging today, what is the overriding national issue that makes this year’s Congressional elections so crucial?

That issue is whether, despite all the lawless edicts of President Obama, threatening one-man rule, we can still salvage enough of the Constitution to remain a free, democratic nation.”

Recently, Gwyneth Paltrow, obviously not well-versed on the arguments in “The Federalist Papers”,  made headlines extolling President Obama’s brand of lawlessness, stating:

“It would be wonderful if we are able to give this man all the power he needs to accomplish the things he needs to,” Ms. Paltrow said.

The same mindless drivel permeates America, with citizens completely uneducated about The Constitution, American history and more importantly our foundational principles.  In country music small remnants of American ideals still linger and Paltrow’s comments  brought to mind the lyrics from an old Aaron Tippin song, “You’ve Got To Stand For Something”: “You’ve got to stand for something or  you’ll fall for anything!”   What Paltrow is preening about is giving one man unchecked power.  In her isolated, elitist celebrity bubble, she rubs elbows with movers and shakers of the American political left, but one can only wonder if she has ever read “The Constitution of the United States”.

My friend, Minta, expressed the erosion of American ideals based on our founding principles, in our latest email exchange:

“I think we need to think about two different countries, one called the United States and the other called America. Most people in our country no longer live in America, just the States. It’s a useful way to view it. They can absolutely be un-American, because America is an idea set onto a real country. If that country loses the idea—the ideas and ideals—America will cease to be. This is the fight we are waging: to keep the United States being America too.”

In lieu of fabricated narratives, lame hash-tag campaigns and repeating hollow slogans, it’s time for Americans to do some independent research away from political ideologues on either side of the political aisle.  Dr. Sowell feels this election is imperative to check the tide of lawlessness (yes, even some liberal law professors have spoken out against President Obama’s brand of “I’ve got a pen and a phone” governance by executive decree) and I hope a Republican majority can check executive hubris, but our problems, while magnified by high-profile attention to Washington, stem from a lazy, uneducated citizenry, bereft of even a morsel of dedication to civic duty.  More than half the country receives some form of hand-outs from Washington, content to believe in what is owed to them rather than what they owe America.  We have become a nation of mindless followers and one election, albeit a crucially important one, won’t change America, until, “we the people” can sit down at the dinner table as one nation, united by our American ideals.

President Lincoln, attempting to unite a divided America at the close of the  US Civil War, left us with these immortal words:

“It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion – that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain – that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

His words remain important, but even more important is how a man from humble origins became one of the most pivotal presidents in American history.  “The Eloquent President”, by Ronald C. White, Jr.,  takes you on a journey of understanding Lincoln through his words and as one of our most gifted writers and orators to ever hold the office of President, plenty of material exists.  Lincoln didn’t have access to public libraries or the internet; what he had was the intestinal fortitude to pick himself up and work hard to improve himself.  He refused to believe in “insurmountable obstacles” (yes, that ever-recurring LB theme – “faith to move mountains” and a willingness to work hard).  A little story from Lincoln’s youth explains how this backwoods lawyer found the words to pen the Gettysburg Address.  White writes:

“When Lincoln moved to New Salem he made the decision to master the English language by an intense study of grammar.  While living in New Salem, Lincoln heard that a farmer, John Vance, owned a copy of Samuel Kirkham’s English Grammar.  Lincoln walked six miles to get it.  He was twenty-three years old.” (pages 102-103)

No one handed President Lincoln a free ride to an Ivy league school and likewise Dr. Sowell’s personal biography demonstrates that with hard work anyone can succeed.  Lincoln walked six miles to track down a book he thought held the key to improving his grammar; Dr. Sowell, a poor black man from Harlem,  worked hard to acquire an education in the 1950s, long before the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964.

A few years ago I wrote a piece, “The Quest For American Leadership In The 21st Century: A Few Home Truths” and I still think my three-step plan is worth considering:

“The quest for our 21st century American leaders starts with you. Step One: Think for yourself; move away from being swayed by political partisans hurling talking points at you. Take the time to study issues, candidates and find your own moral compass. President George Washington, my favorite founding father, wrote a list titled, Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior In Company and Conversation”, 110 rules covering everything from admonitions not to clean your teeth with the tablecloth to don’t run in the streets. He ended with #110: “Labour to keep alive in your breast that Little Spark of Celestial Fire Called Conscience.” That should be your guide.

Step Two: Be the leader of your own destiny. Don’t be a follower of populist movements. left or right, unless you have completed Step One. Before becoming a political lemming, allowing professional media figures to press your political hot buttons, calmly discuss issues with family and friends. In our 24 hour news cycle, internet-connected world, misinformation, disinformation and outright lies can circle the globe in minutes. Don’t let these control your political reasoning, refer back to Step Two.

Step Three: Follow the rules. President Lincoln’s call for reverence for the laws provides the keystone to rebuilding a stronger America. When political aspirants lack personal integrity, obfuscate on public issues, or find excuses for not following the rules; move on and continue your quest for worthy leaders. To honor those who sacrificed all, to secure our blessings of liberty, at the very least we all have a duty to become informed citizens, who demand men and women of character to lead us in this century.”

3 Comments

Filed under American Character, American History, Food for Thought, General Interest, Gladius Maximus, Politics, The Constitution

Story of the Week: Defence of Fort M‘Henry

Story of the Week: Defence of Fort M‘Henry.

Leave a comment

Filed under American History, General Interest, Military

One American Team

Yesterday marked the centennial of the most debated “pivotal moment” surrounding the outbreak of WWI, the June 28, 1914 assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Duchess Sophia, by a Serbian nationalist.  Historians and lay people pinpoint this moment as setting in motion a series of actions by the various heads of state in Europe, who at this time could all trace their genealogy to the royal family in England, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha monarchy (conveniently renamed the oh so British House of Windsor in 1917) or as one of my sons lays the blame squarely on “Queen Victoria’s greedy grandchildren”.

Glenn Beck frequently denotes current events as the Archduke Ferdinand moment too and while he often is correct in how he reads the raging Islamist Ascendency sweeping the Muslim world, often the dots he connects in concrete conspiracy theories leave me bewildered and confused.  Perhaps the way to read history is to try to step back and take a civilizational view of world events, then look closer at the little picture events such as the Archduke  Ferdinand moment and from there see what threads really do weave a clearer picture.

Some historians try to eradicate the people problems from history and deflate events to all sorts of other forces at play from resources to demographic surges, to intractable sectarian/tribal animosities, etc. Personally, while all these play into events, at the end of the day, I think, our fate, just like every other civilization’s  hinges on leadership – yep, who will guide our ship of state determines whether we can traverse around those giant icebergs, lying silent and menacingly beneath the surface of a calm sea.  Who we choose to captain our ship determines whether we will sink ignobly into the sea like the Titanic or bravely attack icebergs like our modern iceberg tracking, “FROM SEA, TO AIR, TO SPACE”.

Now, with the current implosion of the fledgling Iraqi state, the collapse of the Bush ME democracy project, the duplicitous and  dangerous support to radical Islamist extremists by Obama, the wolf in sheep’s clothing if there ever was one, we (the American people) are left with a totally failed foreign policy in a region set to go up in flames.  So, rather than cry over partisan spilled milk, let’s put on our “thinking caps” (if such still exist in this dismal failed educational system in America) and look at the map, define our national interests, really assess the “big picture” (the Sunni-Shia battle for control of the House of Islam), then figure out where we want to dig our firebreaks in this raging inferno.  No, let’s not become the air force for either side in this battle for Iraq.  How about we look to the potential for nuclear weapons ending up on the loose or in the hands of total loons, like the Mahdi zealots in Iran or some Taliban zealots in Pakistan or even worse some rogue Islamist crazies?  These situations should give us a great deal of anxiety and to mitigate disaster will take close cooperation between Russia, China, the US, our European allies and Israel (of course, help from some sane Muslim leaders would be helpful, but is unlikely and most likely untrustworthy).

Juxtaposed to the ME conflagration, President Obama has set in motion the Van Jones/Cloward-Piven plan, yes, it’s true, even if you’d like to pretend it’s not happening – “top down, bottom up, inside out” – written by the likes of Van Jones and Cloward-Piven radicals.  The immigrant children flooding the border presently are part of their manifesto, the partisan rancor, yep that too.  The demise of the American economy – deliberate there too.  Arming all these various executive branch agencies with SWAT team type forces, under the command of executive branch flunkies and the President, with no Congressional oversight or control, who are they going to “police”?  Another of their lynchpins is to foment race riots and incite civil uprising, pitting ethnic minorities against whites, workers against non-workers, the little guy against the corporations, etc. (a classic divide and conquer strategy).  Lawlessness at the highest level of our government leaves us in a decidedly dicey situation. Scary scenario, when even far-left icon, Noam Chomsky, fears the Obama surveillance state, “Chomsky: ‘Obama Determined  To Demolish The Foundations Of Our Civil Liberties'”.

We possess the most technologically advanced military in the world.  We possess a wealth of the world’s most creative and innovative people on earth too.  We have bequeathed to us  The Constitution of the United States, a framework built to weather political firestorms and repair our fractured American polity.   What we lack is a cohesive American national spirit, a common purpose for all Americans.  This divide will determine our future, the challenge to be faced is whether we can bridge the huge chasm that divides America into virulent partisan, ethnic, socioeconomic factions into one American team in time to respond to the outside crises multiplying rapidly and spanning the globe.  The time for slogans is past; the time to leap quickly to unite is here, it’s time to learn to be good citizens again.  Most won’t even notice the moment of decision, but the few who are awake will be the ones who step forward to lead.  Let’s hope we succeed  and  calmly unite our country into one American team again, without having to wing it, as in a story I wrote in March 2014, “Who will defend our castle?”

 

Further reading in Archduke Ferdinand: “WWI and the Second Fall of Man”  by Paul G. Kengor and “Cousins at War” by Theo Aronson

 

2 Comments

Filed under American History, Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, History, Islam, Military, Politics, The Constitution

The Meaning of IS, at long last….

Courtesy of National Review Online:  The Devil’s Dictionary

3 Comments

Filed under American History, Culture Wars, Food for Thought, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Politics, The Constitution, The Media

Defining a Team of Rivals

We live in a society where idiotic slogans and catchphrases pass for thoughtful ideas, strategies and concepts.  Last week the smartest woman in the world, aka Hillary, the longest-mile Secretary of State rolled out her long-awaited (boy,  that’s hard to imagine) new autobiography, “Hard Choices”, Clinton compares President Obama’s choice of her for secretary of state to that of President Lincoln choosing William Henry Seward (from a New Republic piece):

“But Hillary Clinton is, and will always be, Hillary Clinton. In Hard Choices, she playfully extends the oft-cited Team of Rivals comparison, likening Abraham Lincoln’s choice of William Henry Seward as secretary of state to Obama’s choice of her. Clinton writes of how she warms to the comparison, citing a contemporary of Seward’s who described him as “ruffled or excited never, astute, keen to perceive a joke, appreciative of a good thing, and fond of ‘good victuals.'” Sound familiar? It does to Clinton. “I could relate to that,” she writes.”

Doris Kearns Goodwin, an author of several historical works, has come under criticism more than once being accused of plagiarism.  For  a gist of the controversy, here is Eric J. Weiner, from a 2006 Huffington post piece:

“Kudos to the good people at the New York Historical Society for looking beyond the past sins of plagiarism committed by Doris Kearns Goodwin and bestowing on the prolific celebrity historian a prestigious award and $50,000 prize in honor of her recent biography of Abe Lincoln, “Team of Rivals.””

We all know the Clintons’ respect for the truth, so I wanted to give you my take on  Ms Goodwin and Hillary’s understanding of military history:

Here are two well-known, oft-used, simple sayings that have stood the test of time:

Let’s start with the Biblical version:   “A house divided can not stand”

Next let’s move on to the geopolitical/military strategic realm:  “Divide and Conquer”

So, it’s obvious to anyone with a functioning brain cell (that excludes most of American academia) that dividing teams is a way to defeat a team.  Thus, in simple language, “a team of rivals” is one the most idiotic things ever uttered and a contradiction in terms.  Perhaps, we should offer these two brilliant women a Thelma and Louise road trip to US Civil War cemeteries or the military cemeteries of World War I and let them count the dead, to see how that “team of rivals” pans out.  Unluckily for us Hillary seems far from the cliff’s edge and ready to hit the highways trotting out her same tired, old parsed lies, in her floundering book tour.

No better time than the present to remind everyone outside the DC echo chamber of The Gettysburg Address, obtained from the webpage, Our Documents:

Executive Mansion,

Washington, , 186 .

“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal”

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it, as a final resting place for those who died here, that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow, this ground– The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have hallowed it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here; while it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us, the living, to stand here, we here be dedica-ted to the great task remaining before us — that, from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here, gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve these dead shall not have died in vain; that the nation, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

 

So, how about we agree to work toward a new American banner:

UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL!!!

 

3 Comments

Filed under American Character, American History, General Interest, Military, Politics