What have we learned since the pandemic?

I’m still working my way through President Reagan’s favorite dystopian novel, The Journal of David Q. Little, with a little over a hundred pages left to go. The protagonist, David Q. Little, in this story doesn’t have much in the way of character that I admire or respect and frankly, I find him to be a weak, self-absorbed truly “little” person. He too easily sacrifices his conscience by consistently choosing the path of least resistance, even as he realizes true tyranny is advancing and that America is falling apart before his eyes. He consistently talks himself around to conforming to the madness and the new Communist-enforced rules.

There’s still a hundred or so pages left for David Q. Little to redeem himself, but I’m less than optimistic, considering the choices he’s made thus far. One of the things that rings true in this novel to what I’ve read about various tyrannical regimes is the people who stand up loudly in the beginning become the primary targets and are usually eliminated quickly. Perhaps, standing on the rooftop screaming and bragging about how you will never surrender isn’t the best strategy for a long-term resistance effort and more discretion and caution would be needed to survive and work against tyrants in a situation than direct confrontation against overwhelming numbers, who have all the power.

It’s easy to talk big when life is going along normally or to believe you would be brave and heroic in a crisis. Once things are falling apart and you’ve got loved ones to try to keep safe and you’re trying to keep some semblance of normality and keep things together, I’d imagine it would become harder and harder to do anything that attracts more attention and that could endanger your loved ones. So, I do have a tiny bit of sympathy for David Q. Little.

The above video offers an explanation for why most people are so obedient. For myself, I’m an odd mix, because by nature I’m a contrarian and often hold views that go against the popular opinion of the day. I’m used to being the one person, who doesn’t agree in a crowd and mostly, I am used to being the odd person out and I don’t care really. At the same time, if there’s some “rule” – government or even a private business posts a sign with their rules of conduct, I generally strive to be polite and a good citizen. The pandemic forced me to reevaluate where I stand on being such a “following the rules” kind of person “to be polite.” And I’m still mulling that over.

We were manipulated by the use of emotional blackmail, with experts warning us that we would be jeopardizing the lives of our “at risk” loved ones (grandma and grandpa) if we didn’t comply. Who on earth wants to be labeled a selfish “killer” of the elderly? That deliberate use of emotional blackmail by our public health officials and political class has left a bitter taste in my mouth, especially considering these same people made rules blocking loved ones from seeing their elderly loved ones in nursing homes and being at the side of loved ones who died in hospitals and nursing homes. Then to top that off all sorts of crazy funeral rules were enacted around the country to interfere in families being allowed to grieve as they wanted. My late husband passed away in March 2021 – and the funeral home had a 50 person limit still in place and the veterans cemetery did not allow a graveside service at all. We could visit his grave late in the afternoon after the burial. I still think about how pointless so many of these pandemic rules were.

The new CDC director, Mandy Cohen, who was the giggling mean girl health director, in a video above, where she explained how they made decisions during lockdowns, now wants to turn the page:

The CDC wants your trust back: It’ll ‘take time to rebuild.’

I will never trust her or the CDC again.

With all their rules, it’s going to be all kinds of smaller people down the ladder, who will keep making rules, based off of bad information they believe that came from on high or that trickles down through their workplace. We’re going to be dealing with the damage from the pandemic social mitigation craziness for a long time. It’s easy for people to get fired up and rant that they’re not ever wearing masks again and I understand that feeling, but I ran into a situation back in July, when visiting an elderly friend, who had been placed in a nursing home. The nursing home required visitors to wear masks. I wore a mask, because I wanted to visit my elderly friend. She died shortly after that and I’m glad I went to visit her. If doctors I need to see start requiring a mask again, I’m going to wear a mask, because I don’t want to just stop my medical care. And that’s the dilemma a lot of people face when it comes to conforming and not conforming – sometimes we’re stuck in these daily life dilemmas. It’s very much a “pick your battles carefully” situation for most people, I think.

Back in the spring I mentioned trying to grow my own moringa tree. Moringa has all sorts of health benefits and I wanted to see if I could grow one. I had ordered moringa seeds and it should be able to survive in my zone 8b area. Well, it took planting seeds two times to get one moringa tree started. My little moringa tree isn’t much, but so far it’s growing. I’ve grown several herbs, and I’m working to learn more about herbal remedies, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to just stop my prescription medications. I also discuss herbal remedies I take with my primary care physician. Getting some elderberry bushes is on my list too.

While it’s important to move on past the pandemic craziness, I also think it’s important not to forget what happened in America and how easily we just surrendered our rights under the guise of a “national emergency.” We were deliberately lied to and manipulated by our public health experts and political leaders. Here’s a video on where we’re at – no apologies and no real contrition or admission that their rules trampled on people’s fundamental rights:

3 Comments

Filed under COVID-19, General Interest, Information War, Politics

Nothing to see here… again

Just when you think your trust in our national security experts can’t sink any lower, here’s a CBS Sunday Morning interview with GEN Mark Milley, Chairman of the JCS, insisting that the Chinese spy balloon that hovered over sensitive US military sites, during a week long, transnational flight back in February of this year, did not collect or transmit any intelligence data. I am skeptical about his assertion to say the least. That Chinese spy balloon just happened to hover some of our most sensitive military sites and we’re supposed to believe it wasn’t spying…

Nothing to see here… again.

Leave a comment

Filed under General Interest, Military

Interesting interview on foreign policy

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy, General Interest, Military

The forgotten Dem two-tier justice system fail

I quote-tweeted Mollie Hemingway and I want to be clear that while I disagree with her about Ukraine and some Trump-related issues, I’ve read her articles and watched her political commentary on TV for years and respect her work. She’s always so composed and well-spoken on TV and I admire good public speakers (probably because I would rather undergo surgery without anesthesia over attempting public speaking). I also agree with her on many other issues.

I’ve written about what happened to me in 1998 on my blog many times before – short story is I posted messages on the Excite politics message boards and things happened that I can’t prove, but I do believe were efforts to scare me and silence me. That’s why I continue to fight to challenge the spin information war.

As the years have gone by, I’ve devoted a lot of time to trying to understand the Dem/liberal media spin information war and then, during the 2016 presidential campaign, the Trump campaign embraced the corrupt Dem spin information war model too. Millions of people on the right love that Trump “owns the libs” and punches back with as vicious and corrupt attacks as the Dems/liberal media wage. Funny thing about how so many people on the right, who proudly talk about their Christian faith, is they have embraced a vicious “eye for an eye” morality, but there you have it. They even dismiss Trump’s lying and vicious commentary as just trivial “mean tweets.”

Back during the 2018 Kavanaugh confirmation hearings I was very active on Twitter – “trolling” I guess is what people call it, but I’m going to explain why I “troll” on Twitter. I often feel like a lone voice in the wilderness, trying to speak out against this corrupt spin information war that is being waged to tear America apart. It’s worth being labelled a “troll” to speak out on Twitter/X, which was a main spin war battlefield, if I can get even one person, who does have real influence, to see my message or if I disrupt any of the spin info war attacks. Granted on Twitter and now X, anyone can mute or block someone they find annoying, so of course, I realize the odds aren’t in my favor of ever having anyone pay attention to what I’m saying. Plus, when you post too many messages, it can drown your own message, I’ve found out – so I try to rein in my gung-ho attitude and limit my posts on X. I also am the queen of redundancy and am terrible at trying to come up with clever, short quips, which makes for popular tweets or posts. I end up with threads, unfortunately, and realized long ago that my effort doesn’t stand much chance of succeeding, but I felt it was worth trying.

The Dem effort to derail the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings centered on the balance of liberal vs. conservative justices on the United States Supreme Court. There were mobs of protestors on Capitol Hill and headlines like, More than 300 protesters arrested as Kavanaugh demonstrations pack Capitol Hill and Protesters pound the doors of the Supreme Court following Kavanaugh confirmation. Amongst all that drama of insane Dem/liberal media orchestrated smear attacks against Kavanaugh to derail his confirmation, there was also the hysterical #MeToo movement working to incite women & urging them to publicly air all their accusations about personal incidents of sexual harassment and sexual assault. It was easy to miss that what Democrats and the activists behind the #MeToo movement were trying to do, besides stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation, was an effort to mainstream the belief that in sexual assault cases the accused should be held to a different legal standard, by insisting victims must be believed and the accused should be presumed guilty. I bet hardly anyone even noticed this Dem effort. This would have flipped one of our foundational principles of innocent until proven guilty on its head. Here’s a short explanation of the presumption of innocence from LawInfo:

“Technically speaking, it’s not. The Constitution does not mention this right by name. Instead, the general principle comes from English common law. It has since been backed up firmly in numerous court rulings, such as Coffin v. United States in 1895.”

“While the phrase “presumption of innocence” is not in the Constitution, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments both touch on “due process.” Due process generally means that the government cannot deprive you of your freedom or property unless they go through the right processes. It is understood that your right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental element of due process. In that sense, it is a constitutional right, even if it is not directly addressed.”

It wasn’t just crazy liberal activists pushing this idea, it was people like Democrat Senators Schumer, Hirono and even Klobuchar (I quote tweeted them challenging that idea – they would say “trolled,” I’m sure).

Of all places to find someone challenging this idea, besides my Twitter spin disruption effort, here’s an article from October 5, 2018 on the World Socialist Web Site, The #MeToo campaign versus the presumption of innocence. Here’s the opening to that article:

“In the US, the Democratic Party and its celebrity and media allies, through the vehicle of its #MeToo campaign, are waging a battle against the presumption of innocence. By seeking to whip up hysterical moods surrounding allegations of sexual misconduct, they are trying to popularize the idea that those accused of sexual assault should be presumed guilty. This campaign is, in its essence, reactionary and should be opposed.”

We live in a crazy world these days, where it’s a world socialist website that’s supporting one of our foundational principles and prominent Democrats trying to abandon it, but there you have it. The important point I wanted to make is that amidst all the drama and loud distractions it’s easy to focus on the loud noises and miss the signals that do matter. Eroding that foundational principle of presumption of innocence would have eroded our justice system in America and created a true two-tiered system.

I’m now going to rehash a bit about how I approach the information overload we all face these days and also explain how I think the Dem/liberal media spin information war works.

I’ve gotten caught up in a lot of the partisan spin noise at times too and I’m working hard to try to focus on things that I think really matter, like American national security, freedom, law and order, and civics rather than getting drawn into the identity politics of the left (all the grievance groups & environmental extremists) or on the right (Trump drama).

There’s a homesteading guy I watch on YouTube, a very nice guy, and he talks about how he gets so much information from another YouTube channel where the guy fills his videos with “data points” and connects them all, which invariably leads to this guy often buying into the craziest right-wing conspiracy theories that fly by. The thing about using that methodology of just putting down every bit of data and then trying to construct some grand theory connecting all the dots, is that probably most of those “data points” aren’t relevant, aren’t verified information, and really aren’t connected in any meaningful way.

It’s time-consuming to verify information and it’s time-consuming to sift through a lot of information, but working to narrow your searches and trying to filter out all that noise (data points everywhere) and then trying to focus on finding real signals helps me analyze information. I’ve never been trained to analyze information, so I could be wrong, but I realized years ago with that Glenn Beck chalkboard schtick, he was just working to incite right-wing rage against the Obama administration and often all those “data points” he put up were just people on the Left he knew would get his audience foaming at the mouth. Beck pushed all my conservative buttons about far-left Obama’s policies and I wanted to believe some of his connect-the-dots schtick, even though rationally I knew what he was doing was a schtick. Just like all his “reverence for the founding fathers” stuff and finding your inner George Washington. I’ve had my “inner George Washington,” since probably the American Bicentennial in 1976 and have read a lot of books about George Washington.

The liberal media does this with their Trump coverage too – years now of creating non-stop “data points” and concocting one conspiracy theory after another. Obama, Biden and Trump likely have been engaged in corrupt activities, just like the Clintons, but this methodology of tracking every Trump “data point” (real and imagined wrong-doing, because sometimes the liberal media attacks on Trump have been bonkers) just seems to be a gimmick to me and not a constructive methodology to analyze information.

During the Kavanaugh hearings, many top Democrats were spinning aggressively trying to con the American people to embrace a change to one of our foundational principles, through a media spin war effort and fomenting mass hysteria about #MeToo. In the blink of an eye America could have surrendered a foundational principle via a media-driven mob effort.

If they had succeeded, I feel certain, their next effort would have been running aggressive “polling spin,” hyping polls that show most Americans agree with that position, because sexual assault is so terrible and women aren’t taken seriously when they report it. For some examples of this polling spin effort, look at how much gay marriage was spun up and then as polling indicated a shift to where they had some polls where over half supported it, the media hyped those polls, and also used these “the majority in polls” to corral anyone who publicly stated they were against it.

Media talking heads often conflate polls as being some important expression of the “will of the people,” when truly they’re really the opinions of a very small number of Americans. It’s a media and political spin tool to con the American people. Polls are used to hype “majority” viewpoints (manufactured through aggressive, media-driven information cascade efforts), but they’re also used by media and politicians to marginalize people, by framing opposing views as “your view is out of the mainstream.” (based on some stupid poll presented as a reliable gauge).

The trans movement spin effort has worked the same way and along with the polling is endless messaging campaigns to condition us to use new words and phrases – like “gender-affirming care.” On the right there’s an “aggressive polling spin” effort being waged currently by the the Trump campaign to convince Republicans that the primary is over and Trump won – despite not a single vote in the GOP primary having been cast yet.

I actually laid out this Dem/liberal media spin information war operational model back in 1998 on the Excite message boards, but don’t have those posts. Here’s what I wrote in 2016 on my blog: The Pieces of the Media Messaging Puzzle:

“It is a form of mass media brainwashing and antithetical to American free speech principles!  To succeed this strategy requires MEDIA COLLUSION.

It can NOT work without that media collusion.

Here are the components:

  • Talking points and buzz word messaging, which are relentlessly repeated by both political operatives and the media.
  • Mass media domination of the messaging, to control the 24/7 NEWS cycle, which requires mass media collusion.
  • Relentless repetition of polling data by both the political operatives and media, to facilitate the manufacture of opinion cascades (winning in all the polls)”

The repetitive polling spin manufactures opinion cascades. It’s not really reflective of anything other than that people are very susceptible to conformity bias – most people will adjust their beliefs to fit in with the crowd. When Democrats, the liberal media, Hollywood are all spouting the same thing (trying to dominate and control political messaging in America), it’s very easy to drive their culture war to transform America.

Since 2018, we’ve gone through efforts to silence conservatives and others via social media banning various types of speech labelled “disinformation” or “misinformation” and also all sorts of limiting the reach of online posts on social media. On YouTube, I’ve seen numerous content-creators talk about how some of their videos were demonetized or even pulled for using the wrong words. And some have been banned for speaking out on forbidden topics – like COVID.

In April of this year, the Biden administration set up a Disinformation Governance Board working with the Department of Homeland Security to try to control free speech in America. That board was paused after three weeks. Here’s Wikipedia’s entry:

“The Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) was an advisory board of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), announced on April 27, 2022. The board’s stated function is to protect national security by disseminating guidance to DHS agencies on combating misinformation, malinformation, and disinformation that threatens the security of the homeland. Specific problem areas mentioned by the DHS include false information propagated by human smugglers encouraging migrants to surge to the Mexico–United States border, as well as Russian-state disinformation on election interference and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.[1][2][3]”

“On May 18, the board and its working groups were “paused” pending review, and board head Nina Jankowicz resigned, as a result of public backlash.[3][4][5][6] On August 24, 2022, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas disbanded the board.[7]”

I believe this spin information war is a serious threat to America, which is why I bother with X/Twitter, despite finding most of the blue check mark crowd smug and wrapped up in their own self-importance. I have walked away at times, because I kept wondering if it’s even worth the effort to try to defeat the spin information war. Sadly, I often wonder if most people in America have core principles or any concern about protecting our constitutional republic and our fundamental freedoms.

The social media generation talk about “influencing” in terms of how many followers they have, making money and the political ones seem invested in currying favor with the media and political elites. I don’t want to be friends with any of the media elites or political class. I have no interest in monetizing my blog or trying to attract followers on X and monetizing. I cared when I saw no one challenging this corrupt spin information war in 1998 and I still care today.

Each side likes to blame the other side for the chaos in our politics and for the widening divides, but truly almost all of us who pay attention to politics in some way have played a part, because even if we aren’t actively a part of the media or the political class, if we buy into all the divisiveness or fall into rabid partisanship, we’re part of the problem, not the solution.

This aggressive media-driven spin information war has been a driving force in turning America into rabid, ungovernable factions, since the 1990s And that is a path to America’s collapse, as dangerous as the looming financial catastrophe or some of the other big threats.

Taking time to really think about where you stand on issues, being skeptical about partisan talking heads and narratives is a good first step toward centering your own mind. Another thing that helped me form my views was reading the Constitution and trying to understand the foundational principles and I am rusty on some things, but reading The Federalists Papers and referring back to that, has helped me understand foundational principles better. I’m not an expert though. Often as I read more, I realize that some of my views or understanding of issues was wrong or that I had a shallow understanding. Being open to admitting you were wrong is hard for most people, I think, but it’s important. It’s hard for me, because I have very strong opinions.

If you made it through this long post, I want to say, thank-you. I should have broken this down into several posts and probably edited out at least half of it, I know. And here’s a heads up, there will be post-publishing editing, because the WordPress autosaving went on and I’ll have to copy and paste this into a new window and try to get it published.

1 Comment

Filed under General Interest, Information War, Politics

Apologies

WordPress keeps going to autosaving and I can’t edit my last post right now – each updated effort has created more jumbled paragraphs, even though I didn’t change any settings. This happens frequently when I write politics posts – not to sound paranoid, it just does happen with my politics posts.

I’ll try later to fix my latest blog post.

Sorry.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

A video about the life of Elizebeth Smith Friedman

This PBS documentary about Elizebeth Smith Friedman (yes, her first name is spelled like that, not Elizabeth) showed up in my YouTube feed, so I decided to watch it. Considering my YouTube feed is mostly cooking, homesteading, prepper and craft/needlework stuff, I have no idea why this video showed up, but I found it fascinating.

Friedman and her husband developed many of the principles of cryptology during WWI. During the prohibition years she was recruited to help with encrypted messages used by organized crime and international smuggling operations. In WWII she was called back into action to help fight the Germans. She and her team were the primary codebreakers for the South American threat, where the Germans were very active – targeting American ships and working to topple the governments in South American countries.

It’s always fascinating where people sometimes end up when they venture off the beaten path. She did a year of teaching school after college and hated it, so was looking for a job. How she got involved in cryptography sounds surreal. An eccentric rich guy, George Fabyan, had set up a facility, Riverbank Laboratories at his estate to study cryptography. One of Fabyan’s pet projects was he believed that the works of Shakespeare were really written by Sir Francis Bacon and contained encrypted messages. Friedman had majored in English literature in college and studied Latin, Greek and German. Fabyan hired her to work with two other researchers and search for encrypted codes in Shakespeare, which they did not find. She met her husband, William F. Friedman, who was working on cryptography at Riverbank too. Wikipedia states:

“Riverbank gathered historical information on secret writing. Military cryptography had been deemphasized after the Civil War to the point that there were only three or four people in the United States who knew anything about the subject. Two of those people were Elizebeth and William Friedman.[1]: 67  When the United States entered World War I, Fabyan established a new Riverbank Department of Ciphers, with the Friedmans in charge, and offered their services to the government,”

That quote contains an important lesson about America – we have too often let down our guard and national defense readiness after wars and crises. After the Civil War, no one cared about intelligence work. We also didn’t really work to have a professional standing army until after WWI. Somewhere there’s got to be a balance between maintaining readiness and being dangerously unprepared. America was woefully unprepared for WWI. We didn’t even have an army capable of deploying to fight on the Western Front. Here’s a bit from an article, World War I: Building the American military, from the US Army website:

“On April 6, the U.S. Army was a constabulary force of 127,151 soldiers. The National Guard had 181,620 members. Both the country and the Army were absolutely unprepared for what was going to happen.”

“The United States had no process in place to build a mass army, supply it, transport it and fight it. Continental European powers had a universal military service program in place, and when war broke out, reservists — already trained — went to their mobilization points and joined their units.”

Elizebeth Smith Friedman was never recognized for her work during both world wars and she had signed an oath to never speak about her wartime work. Years after her death she was inducted to the NSA Hall of Honor, according to Wikipedia. It’s become rather trendy to distrust and rail about the CIA and NSA and while I do support limits on government surveillance activities, I think it’s important to also remember there have been thousands upon thousands of Americans, who have devoted their lives to working quietly doing intelligence and military work that keeps us safe. This was one lady with unique skills who stepped up to the plate whenever her country asked her to help and she never received any awards or accolades; she just did her duty as an American.

Leave a comment

Filed under American History, General Interest

Is America being hit by the “salami” technique?

Finally, getting to my sort of book report post on The Journal of David Q. Little, by R. Daniel McMichael, which was published in 1967. I’m sure I’ll reference this novel in future posts and to be honest, I’m only halfway through (it’s 557 pages), because I keep jotting notes on post-it flags and sticking them in the book and also writing down notes on paper. I can see how this novel influenced President Ronald Reagan, because it’s a story set in the late 20th century, after a US president signs onto a World Order of Nations (W.O.N.) agreement with the Soviet Union and other nations of the world to avert nuclear war (nuclear blackmail by the Soviet Union).

This W.O.N. agreement sets up a new international organization with vastly more power than the United Nations and it supersedes the US Constitution, even though the people of the United States are led to believe that this is all about world peace and trying to get along with other countries. There’s also a Treaty of Friendship the US signed onto. In reality with the stroke of a pen, an American president signed away American sovereignty to the Soviet Union and the remaking of America and dismantling of American beliefs in freedom and individualism blaze across the nation, as this novel begins.

The nuclear blackmail incident centered on the Soviet Union secretly building a massive nuclear arsenal – “she had a nuclear superiority of about 20,000 megatons capable of rapid delivery, compared with the U.S.A.’s rapid delivery nuclear capability then of only 2000 megatons – down from a previous high some years earlier of about 53,000 megatons.” This suggested to me some previous unilateral downsizing of the US nuclear arsenal, which over the years I’ve heard many liberals advocate.

The story is written as a journal of some average guy, David Q. Little, that is found in the year 2223. Historians keep gathering bits of old Americana from the time the world devolved into tyranny under this W.O.N. one-world system, akin to how historians in our day search for clues to unravel the fall of Rome.

The author wrote this fictional novel with footnotes to fill in background of Little’s journal, which is a very interesting way of plotting a fictional novel. I love reading footnotes and appendices in non-fiction books, so this is my cup of tea. The explanation of the nuclear blackmail comes with Little’s mention of DD-Day in his journal, with this footnote, “Newspapers used this expression in referring to the December 20 “destruction deadline” set by the USSR; the day on which she, presumably, would have exploded nuclear devices over 24 United States cities.”

Obviously, you can see how Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative was likely influenced some by this novel.

A couple days ago I mentioned Stella Morabito’s piece from 2016 about this novel and then I followed with an X-thread of mine, so I want to be clear what I meant. Stephen Miller had commented on the above X-post about President Biden making that bizarre speech on September 1, 2022. Here’s a FOX News headline, Biden shocks viewers with ‘hellish red background’ for polarizing speech. He has continually fumed about Americans, who hold right-wing political beliefs, as being “MAGA Extremists,” and that term “MAGA extremist” could be applied to anyone who doesn’t agree with the left’s progressive views and agenda.

In this dystopian novel, David Q. Little comes to realize that anyone who dares question anything about the new rules being implemented can quickly be labelled an “extremist” and end up being tried in televised, staged public hearings, where the crowd has been coached on rallying a mob atmosphere to denounce the extremists, who are smeared as “Mr. X.” The hearings begin with a prayer about “the fulfillment of mankind’s oldest aspiration – peace” and then a new Pledge of Allegiance. The witnesses testifying in these public hearings are co-workers, friends and even family members. Then, if warranted the guilty are turned over to a world court system for trial.

Many of the communist indoctrination methods described in this novel remind me of how the progressive Left in America plays these same type of forcing new words and phrases on the American public and then tries to engage in public-shaming exercises to force people to comply. The intimidation of threatening people’s jobs for failing to comply seems eerily similar too. If Dems could get hate speech laws severely limiting speech passed in America, I feel certain they would avidly criminalize speech they want silenced. In Little’s journal anyone holding to the old ways, like American patriotism, rambling about the Constitution, questioning the new rules, possessing a firearm (guns were confiscated), and the list goes on and on, becomes a target of being labelled an “extremist.” Everything is rationed, travel is restricted, passes are needed for everything and worst of all the people are being forced to spy on each other and report their neighbors, friends, and even family for being extremists or breaking any of these new rules. So much of this sounds like the Great Reset green dreams and COVID social mitigation excesses.

Amazingly, most people in this novel adopt a go along to get along attitude and keep deluding themselves that they aren’t living under communism and rationalizing that making some adjustments to work for world peace is worth it, considering the alternative of nuclear annihilation. The main character, David Q. Little, a rather conformist type guy, begins to wake up to what’s really going on and begins his private journal as the only place he can express his thoughts and feelings openly. His wife is all-in on the “peace” plans. He is a man consumed by guilt, as he got sucked into testifying against other people and pressured to lead a march.

The footnote on the legislation prohibiting possession of firearms explains that law was enacted some years before the Treaty of Friendship “in order to assure greater public safety.” It also states the treaty sought to re-enforce this law.

President Biden and Dems repeating this “MAGA Extremists” public tarring has struck me as so egregious for any American president to try to engage in creating a mob mentality against a segment of society, especially “extremists,” who are so vaguely defined, that the smear can be adjusted at will – just disagree with the left’s agenda and you might be a MAGA extremist, just like anything imaginable now gets labelled as “racist.” I felt disturbed by this MAGA extremist smearing before I even heard of this novel.

I have several books on Ronald Reagan and in another book, I had read he often mentioned a book he read when he was 11, The Printer of Udell’s, as helping shape his moral sense, but I had never heard of this dystopian novel about the US surrendering to USSR nuclear blackmail, under the guise of signing onto a new international order dedicated to peaceful coexistence.

It’s become very trendy among the American right to rant about Marxists and communism these days, but I suspect most of the people doing that labelling have no understanding of the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution and the decades long Cold War era.

I’ve written about the left-wing Marxist-tinged movements, like BLM, the trans movement and the collectivist one-world governance effort being pushed by an assortment of unelected elites at the WEF, UN, international banking, and ultra-wealthy business leaders, in cooperation with many world leaders under the auspices of the UN’s 2030 Agenda and various green energy transformation initiatives and DEI programs.

America’s most determined adversaries assuredly target both political sides in America with efforts to sow divisions, fuel distrust and latch onto any means possible to manipulate Americans via the media. Minority factions have always been key targets by Marxists to exploit divides and ignite anti-American sentiments. Since Dems and the liberal media invested so much effort with the Clinton Trump-Russian collusion dirty trick effort and labelling just about anything “Russian disinformation,” at this point that term is pretty much meaningless, but that doesn’t mean the Russians, Chinese and other foreign actors aren’t busily fueling divides in America via information war and other penetration efforts. For instance see the Confucius Institutes. The Wahhabi movement has been a global movement too and put effort into spreading Wahhabism to American black universities and prisons. There are other international groups dedicated to spreading Marxist ideology too. And there are also melded ideologies of Islamic extremism and Marxism, like The Nation of Islam. The founders of BLM stated they were inspired by Marxist ideology.

I don’t believe Trump is a Russian agent but, I do believe he reveres strong men and authoritarian leaders, in addition to having no respect for following the rules. In fact, one of Trump’s big selling points in 2016 was about how Trump doesn’t follow the rules. He did encourage rally attendees to punch protestors that showed up in 2015-2016. A 78 year-old man got caught up in that “fight back” atmosphere that Trump escalated, when protestors disrupted the rally and the elderly man sucker-punched a protestor. That elderly man ended up getting arrested and charged – while Trump pretended none of that incitement effort was his fault (the same as what he did on J-6). Trump leaves other people facing their legal bills, and until just recently had offered no financial assistance to J-6 attendees facing charges for their legal costs.

Trump followers go to great pains to cherry-pick Trump’s public cover-his-butt line about urging protestors to go to the Capitol and remain peaceful, but I watched that rally and all of the speakers were using incendiary language to rile up that crowd and urging them to “Stop the Steal.” And while I do believe there was serious law enforcement failure that day and the FBI might have had informants in the crowd, Trump set up that rally to pressure Mike Pence to do something he had no constitutional authority to do.

So, we have this mob formation going on not just on the left with all their hate speech dramas and othering people, but on both sides of the partisan aisle in America now.

Back in the Cold War days there was a term, “useful idiot,” used to describe a person who unwittingly aided Soviet propaganda efforts. I don’t believe Trump is a Russian agent, but he’s one of the most useful idiots for Putin. Trump basked in Putin’s praise, Trump also trashed NATO constantly and talked about wanting to pull the US out of NATO. The US pulling out of NATO would be a huge victory for Putin and President Xi of China. That move would be surrendering America’s position as a world leader, without our adversaries having to exert any military or economic effort. Trump also refers to President Xi, another dictator, as a friend and he loved yucking it up with Kim Jong Un, the leader of one of the most repressive regimes in the world and for very little in return – North Korea didn’t stop any of their weapons procurement or alter their long-range objectives.

What America’s adversaries got was the sight of America’s military leaders having fits over the stupidity of frittering away the prestige of a presidential meeting with no real strategic gains. Trump’s followers believe he’s the greatest dealmaker in the world, but if you don’t even understand the foreign policy stakes for America- in detail – and believe a photo-op with you is winning, then how on earth can you negotiate a deal that’s to America’s advantage? Communist regimes are the most devious and deceptive regimes to work on deals with, because they play endless word games and have turned strategic ambiguity into an art form.

On the left we have a Democratic Party consumed by radical one-world collectivist dreams that reek of stale Marxist ideology. That ideology has literally captured academia in America and many American K-12 public schools and they’re working on turning our American military into a far-left institution too.

Our American political and public institutions really are being hit by both sides and I had hoped the communist threat was over in 1989.

In the author’s notes to this dystopian novel, McMichael, explains how the Soviets were trying to find a way to take down Czechoslovakia, the last remaining democracy, which fell in 1948. The Soviets were trying to sell their international image as working toward world peace and were trying to persuade the Americans to give up their nuclear weapons, so tanks rolling into Prague would have demolished that image. McMichael writes, “A way was found quite in keeping with the enigmas of the Marxist-Leninist world of dialectics. For the Czech problem: just turn everything upside down. Keep the military on the sidelines, stationed in other Bloc satellites but close enough to pose a frightening threat. Then, activate a concerted effort to break the will of the non-communist Czechs against a peaceful solution, this through the arts of propaganda, subversion and intimidation – components of which included: use of popular fronts, protest committees, disinformation, discrediting and decapitating non-communist leadership – all designed to generate loss of national confidence to resist the “inevitability of history and the will of the people.”

McMichael, went on, “The means employed was the continuing use of the strategy of “pressure from above, pressure from below” projects and the application of the “salami” technique to isolate leadership and institutions (such as bankers and banks) from lay public support. Targets involved leadership penetration of parliament, civil service, police, judiciary, as well as the electorate.”

This blitz started in 1946 McMichael states and Czechoslovakia fell in 1948.

I’ve been pondering the chaos going on in America for the past 20 years and in recent years it’s escalated dramatically, which has left me concerned that now both sides of America are dangerously polarized and unstable. This culture war, largely fueled by a relentless 24/7 spin information war, has played an outsized role in the culture war, I’ve believed since the late 1990s. I write about my thoughts about the spin information war on my blog and I’ve tweeted about it, but I stopped mentioning my ideas to my family members who are interested in foreign policy, because they just dismiss me as if I’m saying something ridiculous. Unless someone in the news says it – they don’t believe it. I have a high school education and when I first started trying to understand this spin information war, no one was talking about these repetitive messaging attacks that the liberal media and Dems launch (now in the right they produce clever videos, like that video of 3.4% fatality that kicked off COVID hysteria)- all the talk was about right-wingers complaining about “media bias.” I don’t care if anyone agrees with me, because I pay for my blog here and as long as I can get blog posts published, which is difficult with that autosaving problem, I mentioned, I’m going to keep writing. I usually end up having to do more background reading to even understand a lot of the issues and terminology I run into, as I wade through books and information online.

I’m going to continue to be a lone voice in the wilderness and I’ll keep reading through stacks of books and online searching trying to dig for information and hopefully find some answers. I highly recommend this dystopian novel, because while it’s very easy to invoke Orwell’s 1984, which I reread last year, I think this novel offers much more relevant food for thought about the culture war in America and the political chaos.

If you’re reading my blog, I sincerely thank you for your time.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture Wars, Foreign Policy, General Interest, Information War, Military, Politics

Come Monday…

RIP Jimmy Buffett.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Stella Morabito is always ahead of the curve

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”

― Ronald Reagan

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/13915-freedom-is-never-more-than-one-generation-away-from-extinction

I posted a thread on X (formerly Twitter) this morning and I wanted to share it. I’m jumping ahead of my promised sort of book report, here, though. I am not done reading the novel I mentioned in a recent blog post. The dystopian novel that affected American history is, The Journal of David Q. Little, which was President Ronald Reagan’s favorite dystopian novel. Reagan gave Margaret Thatcher a copy of this novel. I read about this in Stella Morabito’s book, The Weaponization of Loneliness: How Tyrants Stoke Our Fear of Isolation to Silence, Divide, and Conquer. Her book is very interesting and has expanded my knowledge on totalitarianism a great deal.

Once I started googling a bit, I found this 2016 article, by Stella Morabito, President Reagan’s Favorite Dystopian Novel Has A Message For Us. Morabito is always ahead of the curve and I have learned so much reading her articles and her book. Her book is filled to the brim with footnotes, which I’m using as a guide for further reading on totalitarianism. During my Cold War era reading days, I read a lot of books on various aspects of the Cold War, but my main interests were military strategy and foreign policy, plus a lot of spy drama stuff. Here’s a bit from her 2016 article:

“For most of the story, David chooses to live as a middle-of-the-road, unexceptional mid-level manager hoping for advancement, but always trying to get by and not make waves. His wife is especially anxious to keep their semblance of the American dream alive—nice house, three kids, good employment. But they soon learn that the price of keeping their own heads above water is to obey a system that demands they betray their colleagues and surveil their neighbors. They try hard to ignore all the telltale signs that the system’s collapse is not just inevitable, but has already happened.”

“The Littles maintain a façade of normalcy for a little while, thanks to the privileges of the cronyism a nomenklatura system—that is part and parcel of socialist societies. But it all quickly wears away as the fundamental transformation of America unmasks itself as a program of crony-orchestrated desolation. As every sector of life becomes internationalized, human relationships devolve into various forms of prostitution and pimpery.”

https://thefederalist.com/2016/09/16/president-reagans-favorite-dystopian-novel-message-us/

Here’s my X thread:

Sorry for the repeated NATO post, but I can’t figure out how to copy the entire thread and post it, so I tried copying the links individually and ended up with this. Anyway, repeating the NATO founding timeline, which followed the Soviet Union takeover of Eastern Europe bears repeating.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Some blog issues

I apologize for all the typos and grammatical issues with my blog posts. I’ve been struggling for a long time with using WordPress, because frequently when I write political blog posts, an autosaving function starts and then I can’t save or publish my blog post – I’m just stuck. So, I end up opening another window and opening WordPress. I click on New Post, then work to copy and paste my post from the frozen “autosaving” window to the new window. Yesterday, while transferring my blog post to a new window, “autosaving” came on and the second window was frozen too, so I opened a third window and rushed to hit publish. Then I end up trying to edit the already published blog post. I have no idea why it’s only my political-themed blog posts that have this “autosaving” issue.

I find myself hurrying to publish and perhaps I need to start writing my blog posts somewhere else and then copy and paste them to my WordPress and publish them.

In case you notice all the post-publication editing, I wanted to explain this, because I am not tech-savvy and have no idea why that autosaving message comes on and then I’m unable to hit save or publish – I’m just stuck.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog Notes