Becoming a “radical skeptic”

Matthew Continetti explains the problem with how news is reported in a very good National Review piece:

They’re Wrong About Everything

Continetti explains:

“Events are turning me into a radical skeptic. I no longer believe what I read, unless what I am reading is an empirically verifiable account of the past. I no longer have confidence in polls, because it has become impossible to separate the signal from the noise. What I have heard from the media and political class over the last several years has been so spectacularly proven wrong by events, again and again, that I sometimes wonder why I continue to read two newspapers a day before spending time following journalists on Twitter. Habit, I guess. A sense of professional obligation, I suppose. Maybe boredom.”

Read more at:

Between the mainstream media running Dem spin, Fox News running Trump spin and Twitter being the news sausage factory, we’re stuck in a news vacuum, despite being inundated with breathless reporting.  This news dilemma seems much like the situation with TV, where we have hundreds of channels, yet nothing worth watching.

Leave a comment

Filed under Corrupt Media Collusion, General Interest, Politics, The Media

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s