Beyond the partisan rancor, today’s Women’s March, touted as a global movement, was highly coordinated agitation propaganda on a massive scale. While the media, Democratic Party activists and Trump administration were lost in a rabid partisan haze, they missed the big picture and national security implications completely. They were willing accomplices at participating in agitation propaganda designed to make American democracy look unstable and America to be in chaos. Finding out who all was involved in organizing and funding this global movement is a national security imperative, just as much as investigating the Russian influence in the election. In fact, many of the same hands may be involved in both.
Yesterday, the media began another massive spin effort comparing the crowd size of President Trump’s inauguration with President Obama’s 2008 inauguration. Most of the coverage centered on posting side-by-side photos of The National Mall in WashingtonDC.
In recent months I’ve started using Twitter and I follow several hundred journalists, news sites and some politicians. By watching how the journalists and news organization tweet, their sloppy journalism and outright collusion to spread Democrat and Leftist talking points is obvious.
Today, while on Twitter, I noticed this massive spin effort underway to post photos of massive crowds at the Women’s March from all over the country and abroad. This was an orchestrated propaganda effort, but even more than that, I believe there’s way more to this Women’s March than just the Dem and American Left trying to delegitimize Trump. All day long, march speakers talked about this as a “movement”, just like Trump talked about his election as a “movement”. The Left is worried about Russian influence in the election and Russian mob ties within Trump’s inner-circle. That’s a legitimate concern and needs to be fully investigated.
The WomensMarch was touted as a spontaneous event that is just a grassroots event, but it’s highly orchestrated, organized and funded.
Asra Q. Nomani wrote a piece at the New York Times yesterday, Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington. Nomani writes:
“Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”
Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”?
I found out: plenty.
By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.”
So, if this “movement” was just an American Left event, it wouldn’t alarm me so much, but this was a “global” event, with obvious coordination with the American march. The intent was to show American democracy in chaos. The big picture questions worry me a great deal, because of the scope of this event and the obvious coordination, and our fearless news media was willingly participating with some idiotic, partisan, petty “crowd size” SPIN effort to advance the organizers of this march’s messaging. For all intents and purposes, most of the American media is little more than political operatives for the Democratic Party and Left.
Trump reacted to the “crowd size” spin with a bizarre speech at the CIA, where he lied through his teeth to try and sell that he loves the intelligence community and the entire controversy about his comments about US intelligence agencies was something the media created. He is the one who tweeted that the US intelligence agencies are like Nazis. Here is his tweetstorm from the morning of January 11, 2017:
Russia just said the unverified report paid for by political opponents is “A COMPLETE AND TOTAL FABRICATION, UTTER NONSENSE.” Very unfair!
Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA – NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!
I win an election easily, a great “movement” is verified, and crooked opponents try to belittle our victory with FAKE NEWS. A sorry state!
Intelligence agencies should never have allowed this fake news to “leak” into the public. One last shot at me.Are we living in Nazi Germany?
Later today, Trump’s White House spokesman, Sean Spicer, had his first press conference, which was a continuation of Trump’s bizarre CIA bombast meant to ingratiate himself with the CIA and play the victim of the “dishonest media” (and yes, many of them are very dishonest political hacks). Spicer’s press conference was an attack on the media where he pointed out some dishonest media reporting, that obviously was intended to make Trump look bad.
For instance, a reporter tweeted that Trump had removed the bust of MLK from the Oval Office. That wasn’t true. The media crowd size comparison started yesterday, it was very likely deliberately planned to bait Trump into lashing out (and he did). Many in the media reacted to Spicer lashing out at them, like snowflakes, whining on Twitter about how terribly they were treated. Some rushed to investigate all the details Spicer presented about “crowd size” and as Trump’s spokesman, you know Spicer put forth that Trump’s was bigger… Did anyone expect anything else?
The media quickly started tweeting fact-checking, pointing out all of Spicer’s lies about Trump’s “crowd size”… Spicer, like Trump at the CIA earlier, took a few grains of truth, upon which he built a whole sandcastle of lies. They both lied and distorted facts to make the media out to be the villain and to cast Trump as the victim. The sole purpose was to assuage Trump’s bruised ego over bad press about his “crowd size”.
I tweeted comments to journalists and retweets many times today, pointing that “size doesn’t matter” and suggesting they investigate who all was involved in organizing and funding these marches. Who are the foreign political groups involved in organizing and funding the marches in foreign countries? Did any money move between the US and foreign groups? What connection do they have to the groups in America, who organized and funded the marches here? Don’t know if any of them will move beyond their anger at Trump and Spicer lashing out at them and start following the political and money trails in this global “movement”.
Hopefully, some people in our national security community aren’t asleep at the switch and are investigating this global “movement”.