Category Archives: Information War

Back to my tin-foil hat post from the other day, well, I was the kid who was always looking for more information and often found the bibliography the most exciting part of books. With my posts on “cognitive security” I’m still trying to grasp the timelines involved in the development of this new field and definitely don’t understand all the made-up language and terminology the experts creating this new quasi state-corporate surveillance apparatus have developed. 

This isn’t some wild, right-wing conspiracy theory. The US government has funded all sorts of military contractors and experts to develop this new cognitive security field, that will be employed to “respond” to misinformation and disinformation “threats.” Once again, in April 2022 the Biden administration established the short-lived Disinformation Governance Board. 

A May 2022 CBS report, What is DHS’ Disinformation Governance Board and why is everyone so mad about it?,  described that board:

“A mix of career and political appointees will staff the board, according to a senior DHS official who briefed CBS News and was granted anonymity to speak freely on the department’s internal deliberations. While one official from each of the relevant components – CISA, FEMA, CBP, S & T, and I & A – will sit on the advisory committee, members of DHS’ Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Privacy Office will also work with the group.”

I can answer that CBS headline question easily. People were so mad, because this Homeland Security board was the establishment of speech police in America, no matter how they try to spin it. Then add in that the “disinformation/misinformation expert,” Nina Jankowicz, tasked to lead this board had a social media history that bolstered Democrat spin efforts, like pushing the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation spin effort and also pushing the Clinton campaign dirty trick, bogus Steele dossier, spin effort. Presenting her as unbiased, would be like me trying to present myself as a centrist, because obviously my views are conservative and definitely to the right. The difference is I pay for my blog and admit upfront that I am definitely to the right in my views. It’s a safe bet that all of the “experts” involved in this effort to “respond to” disinformation and misinformation via some new “cognitive security” framework quasi-government-corporate partnership are liberals in good-standing on all the hot button liberal causes and rabidly anti-Trump.

Here’s a 2019 Medium article posted on Credibility Coalition, by John Gray and Sara-Jayne Terp: The MisinfoSec Framework Takes Shape: Misinformation, Stages, Techniques and Responses: Developing the AMITT (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques) framework. Here’s the first paragraph, which reads almost like a mission statement:

“On May 24, 2019, the CredCo MisinfoSec Working Group met for the day at the Carter Center in as part of CredConX Atlanta. The purpose of the day was to draft a working MisinfoSec framework that incorporates the stages and techniques of misinformation, and the responses to it. We came up with a name for our framework: AMITT (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques) provides a framework for understanding and responding to organized misinformation attacks based on existing information security principles.”

I don’t know who makes up the Credibility Coalition, but it’s website lists Hacks/Hackers and Meedan as the founders. The Credibility Coalition site describes their group:

“We are journalists, researchers, academics, students, policy-makers, technologists and engaged non-specialists.”

“We aim to develop common standards for information credibility by incubating activities and initiatives that bring together people and institutions from a variety of backgrounds.”

“Credibility Coalition’s core values are diversity, collaboration and thoughtfulness.”

In regards to the article linked about the Misinfosec framework, the post-it note photos speak volumes on what this effort is all about – it’s about labeling people and the “experts” developing the entire framework, language and labels are a self-selected group. Here’s a 2020 piece, The MisinfosecWG Counters Workshop: moving from admiration to action, by Sara-Jaybne Terp, explaining Misinfosec’s goal:

“”Countering disinformation is a multi-disciplinary activity, so we enlisted experts on disinformation, cognitive security, information security, narrative and rumor tracking, diplomacy, trust and safety, counterterrorism and CVE from our target user communities: industry, academia, media, community, government and military. We stated the workshop goals up front:

• Draft a disinformation “Blue Team” playbook. Its intended users are defenders, information security people and organizations; its contents should be a set of responses to misinformation attacks, with information on networks, response types, frameworks, examples.
• Ideate supporting an operational global Cognitive Security response network. The audience for this is potential response centre participants and leaders, and its contents should be a set of processes, methods, understanding needed to connect actors, partners, collaborators and funders.”

I didn’t know a thing about “cognitive security” until that House Judiciary Committee hearing in November 2023, so I was like other Republicans – late to the game. However, I’ve been following the Democrat spin information war since the 1990s and noticed some of the dramatic changes taking place in recent years. I had no idea that allegedly President Obama initiated this effort to combat disinformation and prevent another 2016, in his last days in office and now he’s produced an apocalyptic movie where the US is under attack and America’s communication systems have been disabled….

I had no clue about Sara-Jayne Terp meeting with Pablo Breuer, the military director of the Special Operations Command Donovan Group, NSA advisor and Cyber Command and Marc Rogers, a British cybersecurity expert in 2018 to brainstorm this cognitive security framework. From the Terp 2020 article, quoted in the previous paragraph, this is obviously intended to be a global cognitive security network they’re building to police the internet for misinformation and disinformation threats and respond to them. Obviously, countries with laws that allow silencing free speech will allow for more robust policing efforts and it will be easier to counter (silence) speech that earns you a post-it note label. Getting around America’s 1st Amendment will present some obstacles to the global “cognitive security” speech police.

And finally, the world’s elites meeting at Davos this year comes with the WEF experts making “disinformation and misinformation” their #1 risk for 2024… Looks like this global Cognitive Security response network has fully launched and most Americans are completely unaware. The Republicans, who might resist this effort are probably the few who paid any attention to that November House hearing on the weaponization of the federal government or followed the Twitter Files reporters (I didn’t). The Republican House effort about the “weaponization of the federal government” has been so much about Trump’s drama that it’s easily dismissed as just more of the partisan clown show in Washington. 

This is how most things go. The entire climate agenda and UN 2030 Agenda have been decades in the making, but most of us on the right didn’t pay close enough attention and it’s easy to be distracted by and get fixated on the left’s loudest messengers, like Greta Thunberg or we give so much oxygen to the viral TikTok leftist crazies that a lot of right-wing pundits use to stir up anger among the right. However, the actual serious policy legwork and building government and corporate frameworks, that are winning the left’s culture war, were years in the making by teams of experts, who established networks around the globe. 

On the right, unfortunately most of the people in politics are grifters or pundits looking to make money off of stirring up right-wing populist rage, not people who would spend years developing a global speech police force under the guise of a made-up term “cognitive security.” Seriously, years ago it was Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck with their big rally format to stir up populist anger about taking back America, then along came Trump in 2016 to borrow that same big rally format to foment populist anger.

Unfortunately, too many on the right believe that Trump is the solution to everything and somehow this man, who’s still stuck in 2016 spin war tactics, will singlehandedly save America… The development of this cognitive security field started in 2018 and included government funding and involvement. Trump was president when all of this was happening and in 2020, when it came to the crazy social mitigation efforts, well, Trump went along with that too. All I can say is it’s going to take a lot more than Trump to push back against this radical global transformation being initiated by the elite Davos crowd.

It will be very challenging to win the battle for free speech in America, when liberal elites control the information superhighway infrastructure and the right is filled with people addicted to “owning the libs” and wasting time blabbing about weirdos and kooks on TikTok, that right-wing media sensationalizes. 

That said a starting point is to be vigilant about rejecting the new terminology and labeling efforts this new speech policing effort tries to normalize. I am not giving any credence to “cognitive security” as anything other than policing speech and trying to silence unpopular viewpoints. 

“If freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” 

— George Washington

This is a politics blog post. Back in December, I wrote about the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, an “all-volunteer” group which formed in 2020 to help combat misinformation. ( here, here, here). A new field called “cognitive security,” emerged, that appears to have been initiated by the Obama administration in January 2017, just before President Trump was inaugurated. Instead of just trying to combat cyberattacks and improve cyber-security, the goal now is ostensibly to protect people from misinformation, by identifying and thwarting all the bad people spreading “misinformation.” This term “cognitive security” was made-up by the experts, who are working on ways to label, target and silence Americans, whose views they feel are spreading “misinformation.” 

It’s setting up thought police, no matter what term they choose to use.

Throughout the Trump presidency there was an endless stream of Democrat and liberal media hype about “Russian disinformation/misinformation” and all of it was tied up in trying to link Trump to Russia or other Republicans and right-wing people to Russia. Days before the 2020 election, dozens of former US intelligence officials declared that the Hunter Biden laptop was “Russian disinformation” and none of them had any intelligence whatsoever to make that determination. The liberal media ran with their assessment though. Later it was revealed the FBI had that laptop in their custody and could have evaluated that laptop.

During the 2020 pandemic, “misinformation” once again targeted right-wing people as the bad people spreading “misinformation,” but it wasn’t so cut and dried and some of the “experts” pushing all the federal health policies ended up being very wrong. However, while fear and alarm were ramped up, many Americans had their rights infringed upon, including some prominent experts in vaccines and epidemiology being banned from social media for disagreeing with Dr. Fauci and his “experts.” Many Americans couldn’t attend church services, many businesses were forced to close or dramatically alter how they operated.

If you were paying attention, you might have noticed that the politicized labeling craze moved into high-gear in 2020 and there was a concerted effort to smear people who disagreed with the COVID social mitigation policies as evil and dangerous people. By the time the vaccine rolled out, there was a mass-media effort, ranting about the dreaded “Unvaccinated,” which also came with booting out over 8,000 military members, who refused to get the COVID vaccine. Last year those COVID vaccine policies were ditched and due to serious recruiting shortfalls, the military has been trying to coax those military members to rejoin. 

Without rehashing the pandemic or all the fall-out, with the information that came out about the CTI League, one of the key components of this new field of “cognitive security” is to pigeonhole people into groups and label them… to identify the people who hold “dangerous” beliefs and might spread “misinformation.” 

A couple days ago, there was a FOX News report on the House Judiciary findings:

“House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan said the documents obtained by the committee indicate that after Jan. 6, 2021, the Treasury Department’s Office of Stakeholder Integration and Engagement in the Strategic Operations of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, distributed materials to financial institutions that outlined “typologies” of “various persons of interest” and provided the banks with “suggested search terms and Merchant Category Codes for identifying transactions on behalf of federal law enforcement.” https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/alarming-surveillance-feds-asked-banks-search-private-transactions-terms-maga

That link is an interesting read Jordan continued:

“Jordan said the committee obtained documents showing that FinCEN distributed slides, prepared by Key Bank, to other banks to explain how they could use merchant category codes (MCC) to detect customers whose transactions may reflect “potential active shooters, and who may include dangerous International Terrorists/ Domestic Terrorists/ Homegrown Violence Extremists (‘Lone Wolves’).”

Jordan said the slide instructs financial institutions to query for transactions using certain MCC codes like “3484: Small Arms,” “5091: Sporting and Recreational Goods and Supplies,” and the keywords “Cabela’s” and “Dick’s Sporting Goods,” “Bass Pro Shops,” among others.

Key Bank declined to comment.”

Whatever you think about the warnings about the government tracking your purchases and labeling people into groups – well, it’s already happening and it’s all one-sided. 

Last year, I wrote a blog post, Who are the totalitarians?, mentioning the spread of hate speech laws happening in Europe and Canada. Well, this effort is ongoing in America too and the architects here are having to find ways to mask federal government involvement due to our 1st Amendment free speech rights, so expect more melding government via “nudging” of private corporations pressuring people to comply to the far-left speech policing dictates or corporations working with federal government entities to identify people who run afoul of the new speech codes being pushed.

It’s easy to dismiss all of this as more tin-foil hat musings, but it was just last year that the Biden administration launched a short-lived “Disinformation Governance Board” within the Department of Homeland Security with this woman as the head of it:

This is the new Biden administration head of Ministry of Truth, Nina Jankowicz. She is in charge of what’s truth and fiction in America. Every time you think the Biden administration can’t get more ridiculous, they do: pic.twitter.com/SKCaLafDzv

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 29, 2022

There are all sorts of clips this week of the WEF annual meeting in Davos, where the world’s elite fly in and share all their ideas on how to radically transform the world and right-wing media always go berserk highlighting this. However, those right-wing concerns, I believe, aren’t all wild tin-foil hat craziness. Just follow the bits of information that keep cropping up in Europe, Canada, Australia and here at home in America that center on “fighting misinformation” and the left’s battle against “hate speech.”

Back in May 2023, Biden climate envoy, John Kerry, was claiming victory for the climate agenda:

“The economy has so drastically and fundamentally changed in the past several years, Kerry argued – spurred in large part by the Democrats’ climate and energy law passed last year – that the markets would reject a challenge to the nation’s clean energy trajectory.

“I don’t think anybody elected president – Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative – could change what is happening today,” President Joe Biden’s top climate diplomat told CNN in a candid and wide-ranging interview in his State Department office.” https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/12/politics/john-kerry-republicans-china-biden-climate/index.html

Despite Kerry’s claiming victory for the green transformation, this transformation also includes a radical social policy agenda. Populist uprisings in Europe have been increasing in the last few years, with farmers in revolt and even here in America, there have been several boycott efforts. For all of Kerry’s bravado, he’s repositioning himself and stepping down as Biden’s climate envoy in a few weeks.

Being very distrusting of the Democrat stealth way of ramming through policies or finding corrupt ways to work around the US Constitution, to implement their policies, I think it’s probably safe to keep my tin foil hat, pictured above, handy. One of my sons made that for me several years ago when I was telling him about the corrupt Dem spin information war. I was a tiny bit hurt that he completely dismissed what I was saying, but watching that spin info war progress and all the word games that accompany it, unfortunately most people just “trust the experts” and start spouting the new words and phrases the media and elites in academia hype, without question. You can look at a term like “gender-affirming” care for kids, which involves pumping kids full of hormones and encouraging irreversible sex-change operation. That term was mainstreamed via a mass-media spin effort, replete with all sorts of experts selling it. Millions of people began “trusting the experts” and bought into the gender ideology without question. Along with the mainstreaming the new gender terminology, there was also a mass-media spin effort to demonize anyone who dared question the new ideas and terms. 

With the hype about “misinformation,” well there’s already been several years of “Russian misinformation” media-generated hysteria, we’ve had all the COVID hysteria and we’re into the fourth year of dangerous “MAGA extremists” Dem-spin theater. As the experts developing this new made-up field of “cognitive security,” replete with ever-increasing categories, anyone could end up placed on some secret government list, due to their purchases, the social media content they watch or even the streaming content they watch on TV, and not even know it. And with the merging of carrying out government policy via corporate elites, we have no real way to prove it, let alone challenge it. 

As for me, I’m holding on to this tin-foil hat and that son still trusts some of the COVID experts, but he’s always been a gun enthusiast, so when he ends up on some watch list or this Dem-initiated thought police effort advances and hits him, I’m prepared to give that tin-foil hat back to him. 

History clearly shows that these sorts of totalitarian efforts to police speech and thoughts always spiral out of control easily and the people making the lists never run out of new labels to divide and silence people.

Patterns:

NEW: A binder containing highly classified information related to Russian election interference went missing at the end of Trump’s presidency, raising alarms among intel officials, sources tell @jeremyherb, @NatashaBertrand, @evanperez & me.

More: https://t.co/iF5I6Gx9p5

— Zachary Cohen (@ZcohenCNN) December 15, 2023

Trump-Russian Collusion 3.0 narrative…😴 https://t.co/iBUZ08wiey

— libertybelle (@susan_heward) December 15, 2023

David Corn was instrumental in spreading the Trump-Russia Collusion story. Here’s a March 20, 2017 Howard Blum piece, How Ex-Spy Christopher Steele Compiled His Explosive Trump-Russia Dossier, in Vanity Fair:

“In early October, on a trip to New York, Steele sat down with David Corn, the 58-year-old Washington-bureau chief of Mother Jones. It was a prudent choice. Corn, who had measured out a career breaking big stories and who had won a George Polk Award in the process, could be imperious, a ruthless man in a ruthless profession, but he was also a man of his word. If he agreed to protect a source, his commitment was unshakable. Steele’s identity would be safe with him.”

Dems need some fresh narratives… Trump the Authoritarian and Trump-Russia Collusion 3.0 are boring. https://t.co/KsXnw533da

— libertybelle (@susan_heward) December 15, 2023

🚀Trump-Russia Collusion 3.0 has launched.🚀

Turning America's intelligence agencies & FBI into branches of the Democrat spin circus has severely damaged half the country's trust in these vital agencies, but Dems are addicted to their spin info war. https://t.co/kIWw6r7g3L

— libertybelle (@susan_heward) December 15, 2023

Today Dems kicked off another Trump-Russia narrative citing a CNN story, The mystery of the missing binder: How a collection of raw Russian intelligence disappeared under Trump. They had started some big Trump the Authoritarian spin attack in the past few days and even Paul Ryan, former Republican Speaker of the House, pitched in on this Dem spin attack:

Paul Ryan to Teneo: "Look, Trump's not a conservative. He's an authoritarian narcissist … He's a populist, authoritarian narcissist."

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) December 15, 2023

Dem, liberals and liberal media on X are trying to amplify this missing binder story, which is based on “sources familiar with the matter told CNN.”

Here’s Jen Psaki pondering the damage Trump might do:

MSNBC's @MilesTaylorUSA: If elected, Trump may "turn off the Internet." https://t.co/OstdHL4n9T pic.twitter.com/IcE9rtRfM5

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 14, 2023

Yesterday it was more “Trump the Authoritarian spin” – the same Trump, who as president, had his personal account shut down on Twitter, … is supposedly going to shut down the internet, when that would take agencies in the US government, who, it sure looks like to me, are actively leaking to destroy Trump. I think they’d assuredly be more likely to pull the plug on a Trump-run White House and silence him than shut down the internet in America. Geesh, this Dem-incited hysteria is ridiculous.

This CNN big story is another unauthorized leak to the liberal media to trash Trump by intelligence officials, lending assistance to another Dem spin attack.

Here’s what I put in my Twitter profile when I started on Twitter years ago :

Speech is power, speech is to persuade, to convert, to compel. – Emerson

#DefendTheConstitutionAlways

#StopTheSpinInformationWar

#SayNoToPublicCorruption

I still believe in all these. 

At this point, if Trump has some binder of Trump-Russia related intel, I think we’d all be better off having it released to the American people, so we can move on from all this Dem Trump-Russia spin garbage.

I won’t vote for Trump or Biden and I dislike Trump a great deal, but this Dem spin war has corrupted America’s intelligence agencies and the FBI – agencies vital to America’s security and it needs to be exposed and end. All this intelligence leaking to the media – always one-sided leaking to aid Democrats and attack Trump is a serious threat to America’s national security and likely way more serious than some “binder on Russia.”

This post is about the CTI League, again.  In my Dec. 9th blog post, I referenced a September 15, 2020 Wired article, One Data Scientist’s Quest to Quash Misinformation, which explained Sarah-Jayne Terp’s odyssey in her quest to quash misinformation.  I understand that quests require a certain determination that what you’re doing is right and that it matters.  For me, defending free speech in America matters and so does protecting The Constitution.

One of the bits of human interest in that Wired piece was that Terp likes buying half-completed cross-stitch pieces at second-hand shops and finishing them.  I used to be addicted to counted cross-stitch, watching the stitched design appear on the blank cloth, by following a gridded chart on paper.  As I stitched more years, I began to make changes to patterns sometimes, changed recommended colors, even occasionally combined different patterns together or designed my own pattern on graph paper. 

However, I would never want to finish other stitchers half-completed needlework, because so many don’t keep the back of their needlework neat and tidy.  I want the back of my needlework to look as neat as the front, so I’d end up having to pull out all the mess and redo that too.  Much more enjoyable, for me, to start with a clean slate, so to speak, rather than cleaning up someone else’s mess.

I also love doing jigsaw puzzles for the same reason, watching the picture appear as I connect more and more pieces together. When my kids were young and doing puzzles that fit into frames, to make it more challenging, I encouraged them to dump the pieces from several puzzles together on a pile in the middle, as they sat on the floor with the frames.  The older ones often had two or three frames, while the younger two had one frame.  They had to work together to put all those puzzles together and that’s the thing as problems become more complicated – it takes a lot of teamwork to solve them.  America is facing some very complicated problems and there’s no teamwork among our political leaders, that’s for sure.

I came across another Wired article, this one from September 29, 2020, The Cyber-Avengers Protecting Hospitals From Ransomware: As medical facilities strain amid the pandemic, they’re especially vulnerable to cyberattacks. A global coalition of volunteer experts has stepped into the breach.  This article explains the formation of the “all-volunteer” Cyber Threat Intelligence League, or at least this is the public narrative.  Ohad Zaidenberg, an Israeli intelligence researcher, Marc Roger, a British information security expert and Nate Warfield, an American Microsoft security manager contacted each other and decided to band together during the pandemic and on March 14, 2020, the Cyber Threat Intelligence League was founded to fight ransomware attacks against hospitals.

According to this Wired article, after the trio formed, Rogers was seeing “any number of tall tales circulating on the internet” and of course, in a time of global crisis, who ya gonna call?  “So Rogers pinged a data scientist he’d been working with over the past couple years. “Hey,” he wrote. “How busy are you?”

He called Sarah-Jayne Terp.

The Wired article continues, explaining that Terp was very busy, running two groups working to adapt tools of cybersecurity to dealing with misinformation (cognitive security is this new field).  And she’d been on the road sorting butterflies from moths “spending the previous nine months criss-crossing the US on a one-woman quest to better understand how misinformation affects middle America.”

The British data collector spent nine months trudging across America studying those MAGA moths.  What a task to try to understand ordinary Americans’ viewpoints, as opposed to the elite butterflies among the left.

Again, this Wired article was September 29, 2020 and the mission had expanded from protecting hospitals from ransomware attacks in March 2020 to by September 2020:

“”Rogers tells me the league’s misinformation team had recently started tracking campaigns targeting the George Floyd protestors. They’d seen posts saying that antifa was causing riots and that were trying to bait Black Lives Matter supporters to attend protests intentionally scheduled to conflict with second amendment rallies. It was a bit far afield from the league’s original mission, but the volume of misinformation was so great and the potential for harm—both viral and violent—so high. “You have sophisticated groups who are doing this, who have great attention to detail,” he says. “Protests can create life-threatening situations.”

Clearly, their mission had shifted from protecting hospitals into partisan politics.

Imagine if those MAGA moths thought George Floyd was a fentanyl addict, resisting arrest and didn’t buy the entire liberal media narrative – how unacceptable is that…  Or what if they noticed the glaring double standard that the people who protested lockdowns were spun up by liberal media as evildoers threatening public safety, who should be stopped, while the George Floyd protestors taking to the streets were cheered as heroic champions for justice by that same liberal media.  Now, that would be totally unacceptable…  

Again the Twitter File journalists claim: “The whistleblower alleges that a leader of CTI League, a “former” British intelligence analyst, was “in the room” at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter-disinformation project to stop a “repeat of 2016.”

The idea that you’re protecting people by controlling what information they’re allowed to see or what they can say is vastly different than protecting people, businesses, organizations, government computer systems from malicious cyberattacks.  In America people have the right to believe whatever the heck they want, even disinformation and misinformation.  They also have the constitutionally-protected right to free speech – especially political speech. The alleged Obama tasking – to create a counter-disinformation project to stop a “repeat of 2016,” seems bolstered by these two Wired articles.  It’s one thing to have eyes outward to hostile foreign information operations and try to counter that disinformation/misinformation than targeting Americans’ free speech.  It would take finding a lot of go-arounds to get around our 1st Amendment free speech protections.

So, if the quest began being tasked in 2017 by Team Obama to stop a “repeat of 2016” to 2018 brainstorming in Tampa with Pablo Breuer, the military director of the Special Operations Command Donovan Group (2018 link : “Pablo Breuer is currently the director of US Special Operations Command Donovan Group and senior military advisor and innovation officer to SOFWERX”), while Trump was president and the objective is to stop a “repeat of 2016,” I wonder if anyone in Trump’s national security team was aware of their work and I wonder how much government money was funding it.  Did anyone in Congress know about their work or have any oversight?

Then by March 2020, it’s COVID “Cyber-Avengers” to the rescue and by September 2020, they were tracking misinformation targeting those “mostly peaceful” George Floyd protestors, who were victims of being baited… as they burned the police precinct down in Minneapolis, ripped down statues, looted stores, etc.   What the hell…

Nothing to see here, at all.  Sure, I completely believe these Wired narratives of the genesis of “cognitive security” and the  CTI League as just noble volunteers… on a quest to protect our beliefs from being hacked… (my eyes have already rolled back into my head).

Here’s a Washington Examiner article worth a read: Top Republicans throw support behind major Biden ‘censorship’ lawsuit by conservative media.  It appears the Republicans weren’t in the loop on any of these new censorship regimes that the Obama crowd in the Biden White House set-up and I think it’s a safe-bet, no one in the Trump administration had been involved in that information loop.  

The Twitter Files piece, CTIL Files #1: US And UK Military Contractors Created Sweeping Plan For Global Censorship In 2018, New Documents Show, mentioned CTI League “volunteers” who were actively serving in the FBI and other agencies being involved in this effort:

“According to the whistleblower, roughly 12-20 active people involved in CTIL worked at the FBI or CISA. “For a while, they had their agency seals — FBI, CISA, whatever — next to your name,” on the Slack messaging service, said the whistleblower. Terp “had a CISA badge that went away at some point,” the whistleblower said.”

I hate that ranting about a “deep state” that Trump did, but geesh, he might have been completely right.

All I know for sure is Democrats and the liberal media will become an impenetrable wall of “nothing to see here” and it will be the same Dem spin playbook as usual – their time-tested admit nothing, deny everything, make counter accusations… rinse, repeat.

12/14/2023: Adding a note here, because with using my snarky tone, I minimized what the Wired article said about Rogers concern about two groups with opposing views being manipulated online into showing up at the same location to protest could lead to violence. I  let my disgust with FBI director, Wray, testifying under oath to Congress about Antifa not being an organization and being dismissive of Antifa being any sort of threat, despite Antifa’s history of violence in Portland and Seattle. There were numerous reports of Antifa being present at some of the BLM rioting in 2020, but I wanted to clarify that what Rogers appeared to be mentioning could be a cause for concern 

There was a report of an event like this happening in TX several years ago. In that event no groups had actually scheduled protests and someone or some group was just posting messages trying to incite supporters of two competing causes to show up at the same location. The 2017 article cites federal lawmakers blaming Russian facebook pages, but considering how dubious claims of Russian disinformation have turned out to be, who knows… the Clinton campaign paid and had the bogus Steele dossier created, alleging Trump-Russian collusion, Dem operatives and Silicon bigwigs created fake Russian bots in a 2017 Senate race to smear a Republican Senate candidate as being supported by Russia, the dubious track record of the Hamilton 68 dashboard set up to identify Russian disinformation online, and the US Senate report on Russian social media operations being written by a company where the CEO was one of the participants in that Dem false flag operation creating fake Russian bots in 2017.

In general someone or some group online trying to create confrontations between competing groups in the real world could be dangerous. However, that doesn’t mean I want a “cognitive security” force policing speech in America.

I interpreted The Wired article as being sympathetic to BLM. BLM was a radical group started by self-avowed Marxists and they were pushing “defund the police” in 2020, which created mayhem in many urban police departments. There was a great deal of violence associated with the BLM organized George Floyd protests in 2020 and I believe the mainstream media tried to spin that away – “mostly peaceful protestors” one CNN reporter reported, as buildings were burning in the background.

“A report from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project estimated that between May 26 and August 22, 93% of individual protests were “peaceful and nondestructive”^[40][41] and research from the Nonviolent Action Lab and Crowd Counting Consortium estimated that by the end of June, 96.3% of 7,305 demonstrations involved no injuries and no property damage.^[42] However, arson, vandalism, and looting that occurred between May 26 and June 8 caused approximately $1–2 billion in insured damages nationally, the highest recorded damage from civil disorder in U.S. history, and surpassing the record set during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.^[6][43]“

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests#:~:text=However%2C%20arson%2C%20vandalism%2C%20and,the%201992%20Los%20Angeles%20riots.

After some time trying to learn a bit more about the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, it’s mission, when it was formed, who was involved, how it is funded, etc., I still have more questions than answers.   Most of all I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around the term “cognitive security,”  which comes with a whole new language, loads of military-type acronyms and borrowing military terms and applying them to information operations within the United States and abroad. This new field of cognitive security is reportedly being developed to identify threats and combat misinformation. 

The Taibbi, Schellenbeger, Gutentag, Substack article asserts: “The whistleblower alleges that a leader of CTI League, a “former” British intelligence analyst, was “in the room” at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter-disinformation project to stop a “repeat of 2016.”

I haven’t come across any information to corroborate this British intelligence analyst in the Obama WH in 2017, but the British CTI League person is Sarah-Jayne Terp.

Here’s a September 2020, Wired article, One Data Scientist’s Quest to Quash Misinformation, which explains the work of British data scientist, Sarah-Jayne Terp, who has a long career, including as a defense researcher for the British government and her work in developing the field of “cognitive security.”  This article goes through how in 2018 Terp was invited by Pablo Breuer, who was the military director of the Special Operations Command Donovan Group, NSA advisor and Cyber Command, to participate in an exercise the US military was hosting in Tampa.  At this event, a third person, Marc Rogers, a cyber-security expert discussed the growing problem of misinformation. This paragraph in the Wired article explains how it began:

“Terp spent the day in Florida brainstorming how to fool a modern foe, though she has never seen the results. “I think they instantly classified the report,” she says. But she wound up at dinner with Pablo Breuer—the Navy commander who had invited her—and Marc Rogers, a cyber­security expert. They started talking about modern ­deception and, in particular, a new danger: campaigns that use ordinary ­people to spread false information through social media. The 2016 election had shown that foreign countries had playbooks for this kind of operation. But in the US, there wasn’t much of a response—or defense.”

Breuer, Terp, and Rogers met again and this began their work at creating this whole new cognitive-security field.  I have no idea how much government money has flowed into setting up these private efforts (military contractors?), what the US military and intelligence role is in their efforts, or what type of government oversight exists. 

So, the Taibbi, Schellenberger, Gutentag article with a whistleblower alleging a 2017 meeting in the WH to come up with a counter-disinformation program to stop a repeat of 2016, I wonder what a “repeat of 2016” even means.  Then in 2018 besides this war-gaming exercise where Terp, Breuer and Rogers in Tampa reimagined D-Day in the present day, they were dreaming up “cognitive security” ideas.

From the Wired article, Terp apparently believes people’s beliefs can be hacked: ““Beliefs can be hacked,” Terp says. If you want to guard against an attack, she thought, you have to identify the weaknesses in the network. In this case, that network was the people of the United States.”

The rest of this post is a rant – fair warning:

C’mon, the military experts spent decades telling us that the key to “winning” in Afghanistan was “winning the hearts and minds,” but now we’re supposed to buy into policing speech is necessary in America to protect Americans from having their “beliefs hacked,” by malignant ideas and misinformation.  What about trying to win their hearts and minds with better ideas?  The way to combat misinformation is to build trust within communities and with people and talk more, not less. 

The free flow of information and ideas is the best antidote to misinformation, not some data experts and brain-hacking gurus deciding who to put on more government watch lists.  There, I saved us billions of dollars on how to combat misinformation – encourage more free speech and sharing ideas.

The best way to dispel darkness is more light and conversation.  All these policing speech efforts end up isolating people and making people hesitant to speak freely – it quells what makes America free and vibrant.  Watching that video of an older woman who talks about gardening trying to be careful about what words she used a couple days ago was painful to watch, but this has been happening for years on college campuses, with progressive agendas being crammed down our throats, where you’re attacked if you don’t use the politically-correct words, and hate speech is defined and dictated by progressive gatekeepers.  It’s also been happening online for years, where the gatekeepers are almost always liberals.

Democrats and these experts would likely never admit that Democrats have operated a spin information war since the 1990s, sending out talking points and buzz words to media talking heads to repeat ad nauseum, orchestrating smear campaigns, and trying to marginalize right-wing Americans as backward, religious zealots and then they wonder why right-wingers won’t listen to them anymore.

I do know the Clinton political machine initiated their brand of “spin information warfare” in the 1990s to advance their political agenda.  They bragged about their spin war constantly.  Their spin war relied on mass media (liberal-dominated) to run their spin war – aggressive repetitive messaging operations, replete with loads of buzzwords, marginalizing dissenting views, demonizing anyone who got in the way of their orchestrated smear campaigns. 

I know they tried to silence people who posted online, because of what happened to me in 1998 during the Clinton impeachment, when I countered their spin messaging crapola during impeachment on the Excite politics message boards.  Not going to rehash all of my own experience again, but I realized then that if someone, with not even a speeding ticket, could become a target of an illegal intimidation effort, it could happen to anyone.  Can’t prove anything – don’t know any powerful people and anyone in the Clinton crowd is above the law – that’s the reality. 

As the Dem spin war in the liberal media intensified over the years, the right-wing media sphere grew in response, largely fueled by right-wing talk radio and FOX News.  The burgeoning crowd of right-wing celebs (many grifters) often jump on the bandwagon of every crazy conspiracy theory imaginable, from the 90s to today.  Of course, there’s now a large right-wing online sphere too.  So, yes there is a misinformation problem on the right too, and for decades I’ve wondered how much hostile foreign information operations effort goes into fueling the American right vs. left battles and also inflaming various other racial and ethnic controversies. 

With the Dems and liberal media, well, it went off the rails completely with the #Resist effort born when Trump won the election in November 2016 and then 4 years of non-stop efforts to destroy Trump.  A 2017 Obama WH meeting, with a Brit intelligence analyst in the room, would have had to have been in those 20 days in January.  Trump was inaugurated January 20, 2017.  I remember well the media and Dem hysteria about “military parades” and Trump wanting to be a military dictator. 

When a “respected” historian is blabbering about Melania’s Rose Garden renovation and the liberal media elites are tweeting about it being “an authoritarian design,” despite her Rose Garden plans being widely reported in liberal media before the renovation occurred and those plans were going back to the Jackie O design, it seems to me the Twitter Democrat/liberal media spin crowd lost their minds.  Melania put together a team of professionals and historical experts who handle those sorts of projects in Washington.  The crazy went so far as to some nuts ranting on Twitter about so many white roses in the new design being racist.  Those were JFK tea roses. 

There were so many attacks against Trump that were completely nuts- but the Steele dossier was a Clinton dirty trick, which was fed into the US State Department and FBI – public corruption of a level that’s hard to fathom and Dems and the liberal media have been crickets about all that.  And then the liberal experts wonder why right-wingers buy into anti-government conspiracy theories… 

I can immediately say that if this “cognitive security” stuff was hatched within the Obama administration, I will never trust any part of it. Then again, I think the Patriot Act should be buried too.  “Security” programs that take wings in a crisis atmosphere lead to mass overreactions and fear and panics about security can lead to people buying into terrible ideas – like lockdowns and worse.

In 2020 with COVID, I believe it was former Clinton Secretary of Labor, Robert  Reich who tweeted, advocating sending COVID anti-vaxxers to camps.  Perfectly normal… But, hey, around the same time, Democrats and liberal media were selling “Defund the Police” and making excuses for rioting thugs and criminals.  Rioters burned down a police precinct in Minneapolis and prominent Democrats were fund-raising to post the criminals bail…  You can’t make this stuff up.

Yes, things went just a tad too far during COVID and this cognitive security field blossomed, all in the name of public health and protecting us from having “our beliefs hacked.”  There were epidemiologists and vaccine experts in the field, who were banned on social media, for daring to hold opinions that differed from the Fauci edicts.  People were fired for refusing the COVID vaccine, soldiers were booted out of the military. Now we’ve had Biden railing about dangerous “MAGA Extremists” and the US military hunting down “white nationalists” in the ranks and a Chairman of the JCS blabbering about “white privilege” for a couple years.   So much for focusing on warfighting…

I don’t want to see another list or labeling exercise from elitists, in the government or funded by the government, where it’s all liberals who are grouping Americans and labeling them as threats.   I came across a piece on Terp’s training, with all the different types of “threats” (people’s online messaging and behaviors) and labeling them into groups.  When the whole Dem/liberal media “Russian disinformation everywhere” hysteria ensued, there was some effort to protect us – the now defunct Hamilton 68 database, which was putting together lists of online accounts who were supposedly “Russian bots.” 

Yet, amazingly, there was no big liberal media furor over Democrat operatives and billionaire Democrat Silicon Valley execs. creating a false flag operation, fielding fake Russian bots supporting Roy Moore, then running a media messaging attack alleging Moore was supported by Russians, in the 2017 AL Senate race: Liberal billionaire apologizes for funding ‘false flag’ effort to link Kremlin to Republican in Alabama Senate race.  To take this Russian disinformation farce to the max, well, leave it to Dems.  One of those Silicon Valley execs involved, ran an internet security firm the US Senate relied on for their report about Russia’s social media operations:

“One participant in the project reportedly was Jonathon Morgan, the chief executive of New Knowledge, a firm that wrote a report – released by the Senate Intelligence Committee earlier this week – about Russia’s social media operations in the 2016 election and its efforts to hurt Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump.” https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-operatives-created-fake-russian-bots-in-alabama-race-designed-to-link-kremlin-to-republican-roy-moore.

Now tell me how seriously we’re supposed to take that Senate report on Russia’s social media operations…

The biggest problem is Americans largely reside in ideological bubbles, in real life and online. Getting people to step outside their bubbles more and talk to each other might lead to people beginning to build some bridges of trust in America. A bunch of elites studying us like we’re insects, awaiting being pinned into categories on a board and trying to find ways to control information flows in America will only make matters worse.

---

Update: 12/10/2023, I forgot the most famous Dem. claim of Russian disinformation, which came about right before the 2020 election, when the Hunter Biden laptop story broke. Here’s a 10/19/2020 Politico story: Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say, “More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

There was a social media effort banning the New York Post story reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop and banning anyone else from circulating that story on social media.

Well, it’s now clear the Hunter Biden laptop was real; we know the FBI had the laptop in their custody too.

Here’s a quote from an April 23, 2023 FOX News story, Biden campaign, Blinken orchestrated intel letter to discredit Hunter Biden laptop story, ex-CIA official says:

“Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell testified before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and revealed that Blinken was “the impetus” of the public statement signed in October 2020 that implied the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was disinformation.”

Another story from the April 25, 2023 story in the Washington Examiner, Hunter Biden investigation: Ex-CIA head hosted Blinken on podcast before leading laptop letter:

“An ex-CIA head who testified that he was influenced by then-senior Biden campaign adviser Antony Blinken to coordinate signatories for an influential letter falsely claiming Russian involvement with the Hunter Biden laptop twice hosted the now-secretary of state on his podcast — including just before the letter was published.”

On August 5, 2016, Morrell was spinning about Trump before that election too, with an op/ed in the New York Times, I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton.:

“Two strongly held beliefs have brought me to this decision. First, Mrs. Clinton is highly qualified to be commander in chief. I trust she will deliver on the most important duty of a president — keeping our nation safe. Second, Donald J. Trump is not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security.”

Yes, the same crowd who was in the 2017 Obama WH, when allegedly a Brit intelligence analyst was present, as they brainstormed the creation of a counter-disinformation project to prevent another 2016, is the same crowd, who orchestrated that former intel officials letter right before the 2020 election. It’s the same crowd who was spinning up the Trump-Russia Collision hysteria with the Steele dossier, orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in the 2016 election, and leaked by Buzzfeed on January 10, 2017 (while the Dem/media spin frenzy was in high-gear to #Resist and interfere in Trump’s inauguration).

All these experts are all about patterns… well, there sure seems to me, a person on the receiving end of the Clinton spin information war effort decades ago, to be a glaringly obvious one with Dem/liberal media efforts to manipulate and control information in America… That 1990sClinton spin information war model expanded through the entire Democrat/liberal media sphere of media/social media influence.

I promise my next blog post won’t be about Dem spin information war, which should have ended when Gore lost the 2000 election, but God help America, we’re heading into another presidential election year and it’s hard to imagine what spin war nightmares await us.

This is going to be a short blog post on a CAIR-hyped story about Islamophobia last month.

Here’s the CAIR link: CAIR-Cleveland Seeks Hate Crime Probe After Vehicular Assault on Palestinian-American by Driver Shouting ‘Kill all Palestinians,’ ‘Long live Israel’ 

Here’s a November 15th update: North Olmsted man accused of faking hate crime attack near North Ridgeville.

I saw this news story of the update a few days ago and so far CAIR Ohio still has this story up as a hate crime, with no update.

Once people buy into the hate crime narrative the media and various organizations hype for political reasons, it’s very hard to convince many people those narratives were lies. In Ferguson, years ago, the entire “Hand up, don’t shoot” narrative was a lie. Many of the media’s Trump narratives were lies (and I don’t even like Trump, but I can admit a lot of the media narratives were lies) and this is how it goes with the news media.

Corrections get little to no coverage.

In Ukraine, and now with the Hamas/Israeli conflict the level of propaganda is so pervasive on both sides and then with other political groups and countries’ information operations trying to spin things, that I don’t have any idea what is true and what’s not. Our news media does a terrible job at reporting on these highly contentious conflicts.

It’s best to be very skeptical about all news reporting these days and this goes for all the political pundits too – even the ones you like. No one is immune from the bandwagon effect. In our media culture virtue-signaling boosts popularity and ratings and although the viewpoints that appeal to the left and right differ – the effect is the same. If you tout the views that are red meat to your partisan side, well, that will resonate with your followers. viewers, and get clicks.