Do you ever hear some political or media person say something relating to history and then wonder if they really have any knowledge about the historical event or person they’re talking about? Well, recently I heard former President Trump make some garbled reference to a communist Chinese leader had to use a lot of force against his own people for the good of his country. He didn’t name the Chinese leader or give specifics though.
While I know any mention of Trump will have his supporters rushing to defend him and his detractors getting on their anti-MAGA soapbox, what I started thinking about was how little I really know about China’s history, especially post-WWII, which was what, I assume, Trump was referring to, based on previous comments Trump has made over the years, even, praising the Tiananmen Square massacre. Here’s a Trump response to a question in a 1990 Playboy interview:
“You mean firm hand as in China?
When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak … as being spit on by the rest of the world—”
Trump has made comments similar to this, praising strongman leaders using excessive force, many times, long before he entered national politics. I mention Trump’s recent comment, because it prodded me to assess what I really know about China’s history.
Over the years I’ve read literally dozens of books on Russian history, Soviet history and Cold War history, but somehow beyond being fascinated by the ancient Chinese military strategy treatise, The Art of War, by Sun Tzu, my knowledge of Chinese history was sadly lacking.
So, I started on a three-book series on China’s post-WWII history by Frank Dikötter. I already had his book, Mao’s Great Famine 1958-1962 (hadn’t read it though), so I purchased, The Tragedy of Liberation (1945-1957), and The Cultural Revolution (1962-1976). I’m only about a third of the way into The Tragedy of Liberation, and I’m very surprised at how many new things I’ve learned. It’s a time investment to actually sit and read books, but rather than rushing to write blog posts or throw my two cents into the instantaneous social media fever swamp of hot takes, I’m slowing down about jumping to conclusions, which seems to be opposite from the way most popular social media influencers operate.
I’d rather offer something that’s accurate, researched and where I put in some time to verify information and think about situations. I did plenty of hot take reactionary blog posts over the years and too often I relied on right-wing media or cherry-picked legacy media articles that bolstered my conclusions. Unfortunately, I think my slowing down on leaping to conclusions doesn’t fit well with the way social media and our political news operate. By the time I’m done researching and thinking about a situation, that situation will be relegated to old news and likely be long forgotten, but at least I will have learned many new things rather than investing emotional energy into social media drama.
And that brings me to the latest hot news, which wasn’t about China, but instead was back to Russia. I was following Twitter with the Wagner Group sort of coup attempt (not sure exactly what happened there) and the first thing was I saw all sorts of people, blue check accounts and anonymous ones, on Twitter posting videos ostensibly from Russia. I had no idea when or where those videos were taken, what I was actually seeing as far as military action and I had no way to verify any of it. This is exactly what happened in the Ukraine War very quickly, where both sides have been engaged in a very aggressive propaganda war.
I don’t know what’s really happening in Ukraine and I stopped reacting to the hot takes war reporting very quickly after Russia launched a full-scale invasion into Ukraine – that full-scale invasion by Russia is a fact, that for some reason a lot of the right-wing media ecosystem and very popular media personalities (like Tucker Carlson) have spent an enormous amount of time and energy obfuscating and muddying with all sorts of misdirection. Russia did launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine and not losing sight of that fact is important. Putin was not the victim.
With this situation in Russia, numerous media and political people floated epic conspiracy theories linking all sorts of things together – some even asserting this Wagner Group action was a CIA operation. There’s absolutely no proof of that given – just neatly tying together a news story about a Pentagon accounting error from a few days ago with the events happening in Russia in the past couple days and stating the CIA-connection conspiracy theory as fact. Many Americans instantly latch onto these types of anti-American government/Deep State conspiracy theories and while certainly some conspiracies could be true and a few sometimes turn out to be true, without some real evidence I don’t want to race down those wild rabbit holes constantly. You can get lost in them or lose any sense of reality, if you start buying into so much craziness, devoid of solid factual foundation.
Instead of embracing all sorts of dubious conspiratorial links, I’m working on hardening my personal defenses against spin information war, because every time you surrender to emotion-driven spin, you surrender a lot of your mind to buying into other people’s deliberate lies and efforts to manipulate and control you. The people on the right selling these wild conspiracy theories are not operating in good faith any more than left-wing spinmeisters selling conspiracy theories are. That’s the truth. If your only defense is “so and so said this” and you either trust this online personality, without question, or you think because “so and so” is part of “your tribe” that means what he/she said has to be right, well, that’s not thinking – that’s groupthink behavior and I want no parts of it.
With the situation in Russia, I don’t know what exactly just happened, why it happened, or have any insight into what the larger takeaways are. And neither do 99.9% of the people I’ve seen reporting and commenting on it. I certainly have no evidence about big conspiracy theories.
I can say though that I’ve learned a lot about mass indoctrination, reading about Mao’s communist takeover of China and somehow, I think learning more about this topic might be more relevant than leading the pack on social media hot takes about events, which I have no verified information other than these hot takes are trending on Twitter and “everyone is saying,” blah, blah, blah.
There’s more than enough blah, blah, blah on social media.
libertybelle diaries 